It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > Gear > Guitar, Amps & Gizmos

Jazz Guitar Gazette Premium


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2012, 01:25 PM
AlsoRan's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Default Gibson ES-335 - What years do you think have the best chance for good quality control

I am concerned about purchasing a late model Gibson ES-335. With the economy the way it is, I kind of believe that manufacturer's are using the power of their computers to "engineer" their products to make costs as cheap as possible without sacrificing their reputation. I believe this to be true in most industries including guitar manufacturing, especially when you consider the CEOs' missions to keep stock prices and sales up.

I have read that to save money, they too are trimming their workforce and trying to employ cheaper less experienced luthiers with the hopes that the computer aided process will make up for experience.

Because of this and other opinions I have read (whether they are fact or fiction, I do not know), I truly wonder if I am not better off buying a Gibson ES-335 from the early 2000's or some other time.

What do you think? Used older model or brand new?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2012, 01:50 PM
Patrick2's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlsoRan View Post
I am concerned about purchasing a late model Gibson ES-335. With the economy the way it is, I kind of believe that manufacturer's are using the power of their computers to "engineer" their products to make costs as cheap as possible without sacrificing their reputation. I believe this to be true in most industries including guitar manufacturing, especially when you consider the CEOs' missions to keep stock prices and sales up.

I have read that to save money, they too are trimming their workforce and trying to employ cheaper less experienced luthiers with the hopes that the computer aided process will make up for experience.

Because of this and other opinions I have read (whether they are fact or fiction, I do not know), I truly wonder if I am not better off buying a Gibson ES-335 from the early 2000's or some other time.

What do you think? Used older model or brand new?
What's your budget?
__________________
Patrick2 . . Heritage representative
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2012, 03:10 PM
AlsoRan's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick2 View Post
What's your budget?
Before I answer, I think I know where you are going to go Patrick, and that is to mention some of the great alternatives out there.

But man, I am focused on that Gibson. I know I should not be so stubborn, and should instead be looking for the best sounding guitar, but I confess I am into name brands when it comes to guitars. I know I sound pitiful but it is my vice.

But I am matruing as a guitarist and a person and am now at least open to alternatives that may sound as good or better, yet save me a few hundred dollars to spend on more important things.

Also, I am only going to buy something this expensive if I start gigging extensively. Maybe I will end up in a church choir or maybe in a Jazz group playing small gigs. But then and only then would I consider the step up. Through gigging, the guitar will pay for itself over time, and getting the Gibson will help with "branding" myself (assuming I can play well enough).

Getting back to your question, I could probably relent and pay $2,000.00 to $2,400.00 since the guitar would be a part of my "brand." (We all know that "branding" can result in increased revenue - ask the guy who sold the Pet Rocks back in the 70's!) I also assume there would be a corresponding increase in reliability and quality of sound.

What say you?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2012, 03:21 PM
Patrick2's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlsoRan View Post
Before I answer, I think I know where you are going to go Patrick, and that is to mention some of the great alternatives out there.

But man, I am focused on that Gibson. I know I should not be so stubborn, and should instead be looking for the best sounding guitar, but I confess I am into name brands when it comes to guitars. I know I sound pitiful but it is my vice.

But I am matruing as a guitarist and a person and am now at least open to alternatives that may sound as good or better, yet save me a few hundred dollars to spend on more important things.

Also, I am only going to buy something this expensive if I start gigging extensively. Maybe I will end up in a church choir or maybe in a Jazz group playing small gigs. But then and only then would I consider the step up. Through gigging, the guitar will pay for itself over time, and getting the Gibson will help with "branding" myself (assuming I can play well enough).

Getting back to your question, I could probably relent and pay $2,000.00 to $2,400.00 since the guitar would be a part of my "brand." (We all know that "branding" can result in increased revenue - ask the guy who sold the Pet Rocks back in the 70's!) I also assume there would be a corresponding increase in reliability and quality of sound.

What say you?
Nope . .. you're wrong. But, I can see how you might have thought I was going to recommend the Heritage alternative to the Gibson ES335. I think everyone here on this forum knows that's just not my style. I was asking purely because there is a wide variance in pricing within the ES335 family. You're concerned about build quality. The ES335 came out in 1958. In those 54 years, the build quality has been sporadically great and sporadically poor. If your budget will tolerate the cost, a Nashville Custom Shop Historic Reissue is just about 99.5% certain to give you as good an ES335 as you could possibly buy. There are also some ES335 being built at the Memphis Gibson plant right now that are pretty damn good as well. I think it would be a mistake for you to shy away from any particular year . . . or favor any particular year. Play as many as you can get your hands on. Buy the one that speaks to you. But, if you can spend up to $2,400 as you say, you should be able to buy a really great ES335.
__________________
Patrick2 . . Heritage representative
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-24-2012, 03:43 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 119
Default

I'm told that the 335s out of Nashville are of higher quality and also higher priced. I bought my 335 around 2006, and because of flaws (twisted neck and ridiculously bad neck binding among other issues), I settled on the third one. It was made in Memphis, as I believe the first two were.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-24-2012, 08:52 PM
AlsoRan's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Default

Sorry Pat.

I read your posts closely and I thought you would suggest not only your brand, but also others such as Peerless. I have seen you list several guitars that whetted my pallette.

You and zigzag I think have given me a solution. No buying Gibson ES-335s sight unseen (i.e.) off ebay unless it is one made in Memphis. I have read similar opinions all over the internet. Might be that Nashville gives you a better chance, just have to pay a little more.

And if I do buy sight unseen, make darn sure there is a good return policy so I can have to time try the guitar out.

I am a little afraid to buy used. I remember when one of my guitars fell off the stand and the headstock hit a coffee table. There did not seem to be any damage but I may have created a latent failure that will manifest itself over time. I would hate to sell it to someone and have that be the case.

Thanks for the info, folks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-24-2012, 09:52 PM
Patrick2's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlsoRan View Post
Sorry Pat.

I read your posts closely and I thought you would suggest not only your brand, but also others such as Peerless. I have seen you list several guitars that whetted my pallette.

You and zigzag I think have given me a solution. No buying Gibson ES-335s sight unseen (i.e.) off ebay unless it is one made in Memphis. I have read similar opinions all over the internet. Might be that Nashville gives you a better chance, just have to pay a little more.

And if I do buy sight unseen, make darn sure there is a good return policy so I can have to time try the guitar out.

I am a little afraid to buy used. I remember when one of my guitars fell off the stand and the headstock hit a coffee table. There did not seem to be any damage but I may have created a latent failure that will manifest itself over time. I would hate to sell it to someone and have that be the case.

Thanks for the info, folks!
Hey man . . . no need for an apology. It's all good. Also, don't be too quick to shy away from buying used. Just enter into a good long dialog with the seller. Your gut instinct will guide you on whether to pursue a purchase on a previously owned instrument. Not all people are pricks. You just need to talk to them and get a good feel for them. I have a Nashville Custom Shop Historic Reissue Gibson 1963 block inlay ES335, figured top. Bought it pre owned. It's magnificent.
__________________
Patrick2 . . Heritage representative
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2012, 07:29 AM
AlsoRan's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick2 View Post
Hey man . . . no need for an apology. It's all good. Also, don't be too quick to shy away from buying used. Just enter into a good long dialog with the seller. Your gut instinct will guide you on whether to pursue a purchase on a previously owned instrument. Not all people are pricks. You just need to talk to them and get a good feel for them. I have a Nashville Custom Shop Historic Reissue Gibson 1963 block inlay ES335, figured top. Bought it pre owned. It's magnificent.
Thanks, Pat.

Oh, and that block inlay sure sounds nice!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:17 PM
mattymel's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 549
Default

I've got a 2008 59' RI (Nashville) that's great. Love it.
__________________
Waaaam...Doggy!

Gear:
1940 Epiphone DeLuxe w/ KA PU
2009 Gibson ES335 Historic 59' Reissue w/ Lollar LW HB
Nash T52 w/ Lollar 52's
2008 Gibson Les Paul 54' Historic Reissue w/ Lollar P90s
Headstrong Lil' King w/ Weber 10A125
1965 Fender Deluxe
Marshall 1974X w/ Scumback Scumnico/H55
Seattle guitar lessons
http://www.matthewmeldonguitar.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be