-
Originally Posted by princeplanet
You can assume that violent outside playing is inaccessible to everyone because you've become disillusioned with the merit of that style of music, but once you've become accustomed to hearing dissonance, you can never judge which dissonant music is powerful to the non listener again. It could be that a lot of the music you reject on the principle of "it sounds dissonant" might have moved you in a positive way before you grew fed up with outside players that get recognition at the expense of other legitimate geniuses.
Here's an audio example of what I'm talking about. Check out Brecker at 4:11 here . Even a caveman I think would get the thrust of his playing in those few seconds... Sure it's outside, but it's thrilling to listen to. I don't need to have a music education to understand that. If you really feel moved by Louis Armstrong while modern guys just leave you flat, then more power to you, but I feel that even indulgers of heavy dissonance can be cool sometimes too
-
05-29-2009 04:22 PM
-
Sure, hey as we all know, there's no right and wrong way to enjoy anything, let alone music, whatever blows your hair back, right? Irrespective of what we assume "normal" people will like, I just hope we all draw our own line in the sand that reflects our own taste. For me that line at present is Late 50's Hard or Post Bop, that's hip enough for me! Guys who jump in at 60's Coltrane who don't have any changes chops, well, in my experience I've found them to be mainly egg heads trying desperately to find something that no one else "gets" in order to seem somehow mysterious and "hip". Just my experience, mind...
Don't get me wrong, long live the Avante Garde, but if some pimple faced teenager wants to be cool, he gets more cool points from me if he buys the Lester Young record before he even looks at Henderson or Brecker.
But, hey, that's just me... YMMV...
Grant Green, What is This Thing
Today, 01:59 PM in Ear Training, Transcribing & Reading