The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Posts 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    I'm looking for some classical recommendations to play on organ. It can be written for piano though. I'm tired of my old rep and looking for something new. Looking for melodic, linear, mellow, pretty, and not boring, spastic, dense, or too advanced. Actually linear and thin is fine because I am scheming to analyze the chords, fill them in, and improvise on them.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    So not this?



    cant go wrong with Bach Chorale Preludes


  4. #3
    Both of those are actually very pretty but I'm looking for something linear that could help my jazz playing somewhat. As I'm not looking to work up classical rep for its own sake.

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith
    Both of those are actually very pretty but I'm looking for something linear that could help my jazz playing somewhat. As I'm not looking to work up classical rep for its own sake.
    the Bach chorale
    preludes are settings of hymns, so can compare to the basic tune

  6. #5
    I want some nice smooth linear right hand.

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    LJS 56: 8 Reasons Why Jazz Musicians Should Shed Classical



    • There are famous stories that Charlie Parker use to warm up sometimes by playing Claude Debussy’s and Igor Stravinsky’s music on alto.
    • John Coltrane and Wayne Shorter used to practice out of a classical cello book together (one story goes that an exercise from this same book inspired Coltrane’s “Giant Steps” pattern).
    • Miles Davis was really into classical, especially Karlheinz Stockhausen and Aram Khachaturian, among others.

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    Can’t get much more linear than Bach 2-part inventions. No chords either. Also I assume this would work nicely on the 2 organ manuals?

    All this old stuff should be freely available on the IMSLP website.


  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    in terms of repertoire, might it not be better to ask some organists? I don’t feel l know the rep that well. Probably Bach Chorale Preludes and things.

    To improv on…

    i quite like taking a piece and boiling it down to a bass line and then improvising. This works really well for things like Bach preludes. You can then improvise lines on top.

    Conversely it’s good to be able harmonise and reharmonise chorales and hymn. This is stock in trade for church organists through the ages, including of course Bach. You could do this in a jazz way.

    If you are interested in classical improvising as opposed to blowing jazz on classical pieces, I would urge you to check out the book ‘Pianists Guide to Historical Improvisation’ by John Mortensen.

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    And of course in the Baroque era, you were supposed to do some improv on a lot of these things anyway (at least that’s my understanding), so you’d be correct in doing so.

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    Oh I find the ‘lute suites’ have a good linear right hand and straightforward bass lines. In fact afaik they were keyboard pieces arranged for lute so I think they would work on organ.

    I like BWV997. It’s got a fugue and a sarabande. What more could one want? The double is florid linear melody over walking bass basically so might fit the bill.

  12. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by grahambop
    Can’t get much more linear than Bach 2-part inventions. No chords either. Also I assume this would work nicely on the 2 organ manuals?

    All this old stuff should be freely available on the IMSLP website.

    Yes, this is the structure and aesthetic I'm looking for. The trick for me is finding tunes that are more melodically memorable and don't sound all lame like a major scale being run up and down and won't give me a tick when I go to practice them lol. The minor ones sound nice. I like the 4th one. I'll continue listening to this and see if I find one that checks all the boxes. The only thing I'd ask for further suggestions is like this but memorable melody.

  13. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Christian Miller
    Oh I find the ‘lute suites’ have a good linear right hand and straightforward bass lines. In fact afaik they were keyboard pieces arranged for lute so I think they would work on organ.

    I like BWV997. It’s got a fugue and a sarabande. What more could one want? The double is florid linear melody over walking bass basically so might fit the bill.
    Yep sounds nice and with a walking bassline too haha.

    Last edited by Jimmy Smith; 03-27-2023 at 05:03 AM.

  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    I get the impression a lot of jazz musicians like to play some Bach for practice etc., it seems to tick a lot of boxes.

    As Christian says, the lute suites are good, and may be a bit easier than some of the keyboard stuff.

  15. #14
    I like the sinfonias that are in minor so far. I think I'll choose sinfonia 2 to work on.

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    Sounds good, hot licks by JS Bach!

  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    Yeah I’ve got his DVD, it’s great.

    Classical keys recommendations-4a655e6b-bf8a-44a2-9f10-22eb7b11f05d-jpeg

  18. #17

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith
    I want some nice smooth linear right hand.
    Try the some of the Chopin preludes






  19. #18

    User Info Menu

    also could get a lot of Autumn Leaves material from this one


  20. #19
    I actually printed out a couple nocturns.


  21. #20

    User Info Menu

    You should ask your teacher.
    He must have played classical music once when he was learning to play the organ.
    Chopin's Nocturnes are very difficult to play and interpret properly.
    I listen to Chopin almost every day because I have a professional pianist wife.

  22. #21

    User Info Menu

    I mean all classical music is hard to interpret properly…. To the highest level

    I’ve often heard it said Mozart is the most deceptive for this reason. It ain’t Liszt technically, but to play it well requires a very high level of musical nuance. I played a version of the Mozart double concerto by two famous jazz players to the missus and she was right away ‘no this is all wrong, the phrasing is very clunky.’ She has better ears for this stuff than I do that’s for sure.

    Bach is more forgiving in this regard… most jazzers play it like an exercise though tbh. Which it kind of is to us jazzers, and that’s fine so long as that is understood.

    Nothing wrong with playing any of this stuff for your own pleasure though. I wouldn’t give a public guitar recital in a million years but there’s a lot to learn from repertoire. You don’t have to do something to a high level to get something from it. Obviously jazzers are often interested in what they can adapt and borrow for their own purposes.

    Theres a perspective that recording has really spoilt amateur music making. Why hack through a Beethoven sonata when you can listen to Brendel play it perfectly any time you want? It’s a tricky one. But you could argue the same is true for anything. Why run marathons?

  23. #22

    User Info Menu

    That reminds me - if you haven’t seen it, I still can’t work out how much of this is trolling haha. It is pretty funny though.

  24. #23

    User Info Menu

    There’s an interesting point Gould makes about improv tho. I know some jazzers might see it as heretical, but I kind of feel it a bit.

  25. #24

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Christian Miller
    I mean all classical music is hard to interpret properly…. To the highest level

    I’ve often heard it said Mozart is the most deceptive for this reason. It ain’t Liszt technically, but to play it well requires a very high level of musical nuance. I played a version of the Mozart double concerto by two famous jazz players to the missus and she was right away ‘no this is all wrong, the phrasing is very clunky.’ She has better ears for this stuff than I do that’s for sure.

    Bach is more forgiving in this regard… most jazzers play it like an exercise though tbh. Which it kind of is to us jazzers, and that’s fine so long as that is understood.

    Nothing wrong with playing any of this stuff for your own pleasure though. I wouldn’t give a public guitar recital in a million years but there’s a lot to learn from repertoire. You don’t have to do something to a high level to get something from it. Obviously jazzers are often interested in what they can adapt and borrow for their own purposes.

    Theres a perspective that recording has really spoilt amateur music making. Why hack through a Beethoven sonata when you can listen to Brendel play it perfectly any time you want? It’s a tricky one. But you could argue the same is true for anything. Why run marathons?
    There is no need to fight with very difficult tunes.
    Classical music is very extensive.
    Just find tunes that are just easier.
    Children from the first class play tunes from the program of the first class/music school/ ...
    Technical barriers must be overcome first...making music is the next step.
    This is probably the case in all music schools.