Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Posts 1 to 50 of 92
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    Ok, I hadn't heard from any more volunteers, so I'll call this week...if folks are still interested in calling a tune, let me know...I can go through the rotation of people who have called one again too, but I don't want to leave anybody new out, either.

    Anyway, here's our tune for week 18!

    JGBE Virtual Jam (Round 18) - Wave-1620912101623-jpg

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    Wait a second ... this was written as a vocal pop song, not as a jazz instrumental. I think we may have a charter violation here. Not that I'm gonna call the jazz police, but we could be in some trouble here.

    Edit: OOPS! I stand corrected. The first recording is an instrumental by Jobim himself.

    Never mind.
    Last edited by John A.; 05-13-2021 at 08:52 PM.

  4. #3

    User Info Menu

    I thought it was time for a bossa. We are thinking together

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    oooh, Wave, OK! A little moldy, but always fun to play.

  6. #5

    User Info Menu

    Yes, it does go back but it ain't an easy solo, trust me :-)

    But it is a nice tune!

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    I thought it was a damn crime to call this a "jazz" jam and not include any Jobim...I'd argue the only non-American composer to have such a big influence on the music.

    This one should be a somewhat familiar "American" form, though...

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    I find the progression easy to commit to memory...

  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    Bossa, esp. Jobim, has always been part of jazz. Jazz players record it and it's in the real books. No probs there.

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TOMMO View Post
    I find the progression easy to commit to memory...
    It's a blues with a bridge, really. Not that it's going to sound good to just blow blues licks on it. But you know I'll at least try

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    First time participant here.

    I've got the real book changes but does anyone have anything simpler?

    Thank you

  12. #11

    User Info Menu

    Ha !
    I hear ya Liarspoker.
    I've always loved the fact that rag does his own backing and in this case, especially, it comes off without a hitch.
    Well done sir !

    Cheers,
    Mike

  13. #12

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Liarspoker
    First time participant here.

    I've got the real book changes but does anyone have anything simpler?

    Thank you
    In a word, no. Unless one simplifies it oneself. A tune's a tune and, with some variations, those are the harmonies; it's what makes jazz sound like jazz. Jazz is generally complex.

    It depends what you mean by simpler. You could reduce all the chords to basic chords, like Cmaj7 to just C, but you'd lose a lot of the feeling. You could replace all the ii-V's with just V chords, so Dm9 - G7b13 would just be G7 but the same applies.

    The other thing, of course, is that you'd never learn how to play anything properly. You'd just get into the habit of making jazz sound like folk music or something and that would be that.

  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    So here's a quick one, trying to emphasize the blues-with-a-bridge aspect of the song.


  15. #14

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Liarspoker
    First time participant here.

    I've got the real book changes but does anyone have anything simpler?

    Thank you
    Like Mr. B says above you can think of it as blues with a bridge. You can sort of get away with just playing blues over the A sections, or if not literally that, keep blues in your head and use it as a jumping off point for phrasing and melody ideas while hitting some of the changes more explicitly. For the bridge, you can ignore the slashes and just think of it as Gmin C7 Fmaj Fmin Bb7 Eb A7.
    Last edited by John A.; 05-14-2021 at 08:54 PM.

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    Here's some couch noodling the wife decided to record on her phone one night.



  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    So here's a quick one, trying to emphasize the blues-with-a-bridge aspect of the song.

    Very nice John

  18. #17

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    So here's a quick one, trying to emphasize the blues-with-a-bridge aspect of the song.

    Very nice take, John!

    Quote Originally Posted by vintagelove
    Here's some couch noodling the wife decided to record on her phone one night.


    I like that type of couch noodling!

  19. #18

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by vintagelove
    Here's some couch noodling the wife decided to record on her phone one night.


    Very nice vintage. Would love to hear a better quality recording ?

  20. #19

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Liarspoker
    Very nice vintage.
    Some would call it a "field recording"...

  21. #20

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ragman1
    (I don't get this blues thing. Sure, it's got 12 bars and the 5th bar is the 4 chord, major. The 9th bar is the 2 chord, but dominant. That's about it, isn't it? I mean, it's not like you really can play it as a blues. Somebody explain it to me)
    I wouldn't call it a blues either just because it's twelve bars in form...

  22. #21

    User Info Menu

    Bebop blues in D (lol) ala Parker

    D6 | Em7 A7 | D6 | Am7 D7 |
    G7 | (Gm7) | F#m7 | B7 |
    Em7 | A7 | D6 | F#m7 C#7 |

    Wave

    Dmaj7 | Bbo7 | Am7 | D7
    Gmaj7 | Gm7 | F#7 | B7 |
    E7 | Bb7 A7 | Dm7 G7 | Dm7 G7 |

    I few like a lot of people don’t know that first variant (I didn’t) but actually it fits some of the common Parker heads better than the standard ‘jazz edu’ changes, and is obviously closer to Wave, the main difference are some chord quality changes, specifically the Gmaj7, F#7, E7 and perhaps most importantly the modal interchange to Dm7 G7 at the end.

    To me those changes are a sort of missing link... for Blues for Alice changes too.
    Last edited by christianm77; 05-15-2021 at 10:26 AM.

  23. #22

    User Info Menu

    Yea the Blues reference is...
    A Blues is really about I7 and IV7 and some kind of turn around.

    This blues uses a little Relative Min. and Parallel Min. And Jobin is a classically trained Musician, which results in about as Vanilla as it get when talking about "Blues", right depending on which coast your from or hangin... there ain't no dirt or grease to be found.... maybe a little dust.

  24. #23

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ragman1
    Well, I don't know, can't get myself off the ground. Here's one dashed off today. I haven't even listened to it yet. Sorry about the other one. Anyway, good luck with this...

    Attachment 81539



    (I don't get this blues thing. Sure, it's got 12 bars and the 5th bar is the 4 chord, major. The 9th bar is the 2 chord, but dominant. That's about it, isn't it? I mean, it's not like you really can play it as a blues. Somebody explain it to me)
    This demonstrates pretty clearly that you can play the melody over a blues progression (though you have to alter it rhythmically a little to make it work in swing time).



    It's not literally blues (in the same sense that neither Bluesette nor Blues for Alice nr Confirmation is), but has a blues form (with major colors). That enables you to treat it as a blues when soloing, you can use blues style call/response phrasing, and you can play minor pentatonic material and/or altered dom7 material and/or blue notes in the same spots where you would on a real blues without it clashing (granted, blues tonality nearly always works over major tonality, so that's not significant in itself). In my version up thread, the first A is a blues solo, period; I was thinking blues in my head and playing things that I would play over a jazz blues. The second A much less so, but has a blues turnaround. The third is somewhere in between the first two.

  25. #24

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Reg
    Yea the Blues reference is...
    A Blues is really about I7 and IV7 and some kind of turn around.

    This blues uses a little Relative Min. and Parallel Min. And Jobin is a classically trained Musician, which results in about as Vanilla as it get when talking about "Blues", right depending on which coast your from or hangin... there ain't no dirt or grease to be found.... maybe a little dust.
    Not always

    Again, looking at Parker; The b7 on I is rarely used as a blue note in the Parkers blues heads for instance. Normally it appears in bar4, acting functionally.

    I7 is more a 60s thing. And Jobim was influenced by Bird and swing

    For bird the blues usually enters in on chord IV, this is as true of his non blues forms such as Confirmation. You get the b5 and b3 of the key on that chord.

    there’s a lot of blues flavour in Wave, especially in the dominant cycle prog.

    Prez was pretty bluesy and we often played IV as a major seventh. As did Parker sometimes too.
    Last edited by christianm77; 05-15-2021 at 10:51 AM.

  26. #25

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Reg
    there ain't no dirt or grease to be found.... maybe a little dust.
    No blues sound then. Defining blues by sheer form is a little shallow in my opinion...

  27. #26

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by christianm77
    Not always

    Again, looking at Parker; The b7 on I is rarely used as a blue note in the Parkers blues heads for instance. Normally it appears in bar4, acting functionally.

    I7 is more a 60s thing. And Jobim was influenced by Bird and swing

    For bird the blues usually enters in on chord IV, this is as true of his non blues forms such as Confirmation. You get the b5 and b3 of the key on that chord.

    there’s a lot of blues flavour in Wave, especially in the dominant cycle prog.

    Prez was pretty bluesy and we often played IV as a major seventh. As did Parker sometimes too.


    yea we are definitely in different worlds...

  28. #27

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TOMMO
    No blues sound then. Defining blues by sheer form is a little shallow in my opinion...
    so how do you define the blues sound then? the changes, the melody? blues for alice has changes that are closer to a tin pan alley standard than a blues. i doubt if e.g. fred mcdowell would have called or accepted it as a blues. is the melody of c-jam blues bluesy enough to be called a blues?

    surely a lad from brazil is allowed to have a different take on the blues than a guy who has actually been picking the cotton?

  29. #28

    User Info Menu

    Obviously, it's not a literal 12-bar blues with all dom7 chords, but you can think of it as a blues variant, or blues structure with major harmony, or a sublimated blues, or some other fancy word for "like a blues under the surface." Or not.

    But it's a fact that for a lot of people being told "Wave is a really a blues with a bridge" causes aha! moments and helps them solve a tune that had stumped them. This is a common thing in the real world, not just an internet debate.

    It's not ultimately a _debate_ at all. It's a song. The only arguments about what it is structurally or harmonically that count are demonstrations via playing it.

    Too much talk, not enough playing. Let's hear empirical examples of your analyses of Wave.

  30. #29

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by vintagelove
    Here's some couch noodling the wife decided to record on her phone one night.


    Yeah, great stuff. Love the way you sing and play, as well as the way you show that Wave is not necessarily a blues .

  31. #30

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by djg
    so how do you define the blues sound then? the changes, the melody? blues for alice has changes that are closer to a tin pan alley standard than a blues. i doubt if e.g. fred mcdowell would have called or accepted it as a blues. is the melody of c-jam blues bluesy enough to be called a blues?

    surely a lad from brazil is allowed to have a different take on the blues than a guy who has actually been picking the cotton?
    Without wanting to go into further detail, starting a (probably heated) discussion and derail this thread: there is a certain sound to what I'd perceive as blues (apart from the fact that there are more than a handful of definitions what blues is...). Blue notes? Dissonances like e.g. b3 against major 3? A certain style of phrasing, dynamics (which are often painfully missing in the playing of rock guitarists who claim to be playing blues)? There is a lot of music that doesn't stick to the 12 bar form and still I would perceive it as blues. Maybe this could make an interesting thread of its own?


    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    blues structure with major harmony
    Yes. Sticking my head out here for you all to cut it off: does a 32 bar AABA structure with ii - V - I changes make it jazz?

    If anybody perceives Wave as a blues: OK then - I wouldn't argue with any of you but I don't.

  32. #31

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TOMMO

    Yes. Sticking my head out here for you all to cut it off: does a 32 bar AABA structure with ii - V - I changes make it jazz?

    If anybody perceives Wave as a blues: OK then - I wouldn't argue with any of you but I don't.
    but without going into the stylistic minutiae, there is clearly something called the "blues form", while there is no "jazz form"

  33. #32

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by christianm77
    Bebop blues in D (lol) ala Parker

    D6 | Em7 A7 | D6 | Am7 D7 |
    G7 | (Gm7) | F#m7 | B7 |
    Em7 | A7 | D6 | F#m7 C#7 |

    Wave

    Dmaj7 | Bbo7 | Am7 | D7
    Gmaj7 | Gm7 | F#7 | B7 |
    E7 | Bb7 A7 | Dm7 G7 | Dm7 G7 |

    I few like a lot of people don’t know that first variant (I didn’t) but actually it fits some of the common Parker heads better than the standard ‘jazz edu’ changes, and is obviously closer to Wave, the main difference are some chord quality changes, specifically the Gmaj7, F#7, E7 and perhaps most importantly the modal interchange to Dm7 G7 at the end.

    To me those changes are a sort of missing link... for Blues for Alice changes too.
    I'd already worked that one out. But the thing is that it sort of makes Parker the authority, the yardstick, of what a different kind of blues should be. I don't see why he should be. I mean, by that measure you could re-write anything between the I, IV and V. Does that automatically make it a blues?

    Like I said, you can't play it as a blues - well, not without a lot of jiggery-pokery - and I'm not sure that isn't the litmus test really.

  34. #33

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TOMMO
    No blues sound then. Defining blues by sheer form is a little shallow in my opinion...
    Quite. That's all my point, really.

  35. #34

    User Info Menu

    OK, it's a blues... according to some people :-)

  36. #35

    User Info Menu

    This was years ago, for "Practical standards" thread. Based on Waves chords (as presented by Wizard), only using just 12 bars of it. But then, it's all reggae, anyhow ...

    VladanMovies & CCC - Car Camera Clips: Driving from Koper Slovenia to Verona Italy, 21. Jun 2015


    My Band camp

  37. #36

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by djg
    but without going into the stylistic minutiae, there is clearly something called the "blues form"
    Absolutely and I have collected a good handful of recordings that use it to convince guitar students that they have to learn the form.

    The Clash, Queen, Michael Jackson for example - they all have used it at one time without writing or recording blues actually ....

  38. #37

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladan
    This was years ago, for "Practical standards" thread. Based on Waves chords (as presented by Wizard), only using just 12 bars of it. But then, it's all reggae, anyhow ...

    VladanMovies & CCC - Car Camera Clips: Driving from Koper Slovenia to Verona Italy, 21. Jun 2015


    My Band camp
    At the risk (I don't want to push it) of flogging it all to death, Vladan's reggae version just shows - to me, anyway - that it's not the chords, it's the style. That tune is reggae, couldn't be anything else.

    So it's not blues by any stretch. That's why... I expect you've guessed the point so I'll shut up now. Your dreams have come true

  39. #38

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ragman1
    I'd already worked that one out. But the thing is that it sort of makes Parker the authority, the yardstick, of what a different kind of blues should be. I don't see why he should be. I mean, by that measure you could re-write anything between the I, IV and V. Does that automatically make it a blues?

    Like I said, you can't play it as a blues - well, not without a lot of jiggery-pokery - and I'm not sure that isn't the litmus test really.
    I’m identifying some stylistic features of how Bird plays a standard blues, and showing how Jobim isn’t too far away from that. Parker’s understanding of the blues features a maj7 tonality on the I chord and sometimes on IV.

    This was partly in response to what John A was saying about Parker, which I felt was placing a non existent divide between Birds blues playing and, well, everything else he did.

    If people are anything like I used to be, you look at a Bird blues in a book and read F7 and leave it at that, rather than looking at the line Parker actually played and the harmony it outlines. (And sometimes you get Bird playing a maj7 tonality over a 7#11 comp or something lol)

    More modern players might see the blues tonality as substantially different to that of a major key standard but this wasn’t a thing, I suspect until the post-modal era (don’t know for sure tho.) Anyway, I view the Wave A section as basically being a variation of a Parker style blues. And it is bluesy! Sure you be won’t be able to plonk a minor blues scale on everything ... but that’s not what jazz blues playing (or even GOOD blues playing) is to me anyway. Ask BB or Eric, they know how to use the major blues scale.

    listen to Charlie Christian, he tends to favour a major6 sound with a b3 for example - the major blues scale. (Sounds great on Wave.) Lonnie Johnson also often favoured the same scale. And you aren’t going to tell me he isn’t bluesy. And back then many standards were super bluesy - Lady be Good for instance.
    Last edited by christianm77; 05-15-2021 at 02:22 PM.

  40. #39

    User Info Menu

    Until the National Bureau of Standards provides a legal definition of "Blues", we are arguing about something undefined.

    And, when NBS does provide a definition, people will still disagree.

    My take: the form is structurally similar to a blues, but the sound is not what I usually think of as a blues.

    I think Jobim could be very bluesy, for example, in So Tinha.
    Last edited by rpjazzguitar; 05-15-2021 at 05:17 PM.

  41. #40

    User Info Menu

    Look - try this, if you got to play blues vocab through it

    D major blues/B minor blues on the first few chords,

    swap to D minor blues on the Gm

    Nail the D minor blues esp over the Bb7 A7 and Dm G7

  42. #41

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by djg
    so how do you define the blues sound then? the changes, the melody? blues for alice has changes that are closer to a tin pan alley standard than a blues. i doubt if e.g. fred mcdowell would have called or accepted it as a blues. is the melody of c-jam blues bluesy enough to be called a blues?

    surely a lad from brazil is allowed to have a different take on the blues than a guy who has actually been picking the cotton?
    Not to mention the tune literally does a massive blues lick on the Bb7 A7. It’s a damn sight more bluesy than C jam if that’s your yardstick.

    One problem (I think) is when players don’t have a concept of how to stylistically apply blues vocab on tunes with changes tastefully. So they can tend to file ‘blues’ as one thing and ‘standards’ as another.... Not sure if there are many books on this?

    And actually boilerplate minor blues language rarely sounds that great on an actual blues tunes either for more than a chorus or two. That’s not just a jazz thing- as I say, skilled blues players all understand how to mix major and minor, and even outline chords.

    vis a vis Parker, FWIW Blues for Alice is really not that different from Parker's standard ‘blowing’ version of a 12 bar... which is sort of a point I was making. The main, perhaps only, change is the move to minor in bar 3. You often hear a biiim7 in bar 8, too in the ‘standard’ version.

    Anyway, doesn’t matter, your point stands... but I would also say I don’t think many died in the wool blues men would be terribly interested in playing Billie’s Bounce either lol.
    Last edited by christianm77; 05-15-2021 at 02:46 PM.

  43. #42

    User Info Menu

    Ok first time effort. Written via short improv

    Tried to add some altered sounds to the V's.

    Any constructive criticism welcome.

    Just one A section

    https://youtube.com/shorts/OwOqC1vMaWw?feature=share

    Edited for spelling

  44. #43

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Liarspoker

    Any constructive criticism welcome.
    Have you tried just playing the chord tones? That is, outlining the chords as they arrive? Not all and every note necessarily, but enough to sound like you're on the harmony at that point?

    This kind of thing:



    You'll feel like you're actually playing what's there, which is a good feeling.

  45. #44

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ragman1
    Have you tried just playing the chord tones? That is, outlining the chords as they arrive? Not all and every note necessarily, but enough to sound like you're on the harmony at that point?

    This kind of thing:



    You'll feel like you're actually playing what's there, which is a good feeling.
    I'll try that. Thank you.

  46. #45

    User Info Menu

    Lol, in the time it took to record this and upload it, Christian made his post about going from major to minor blues...which is exactly what I do on the first A.

    Its not a "blues," but it's absolutely a blues form, which is great for orienting yourself. And there's plenty of blues in it.



    I'll take a listen to everyone else tonight, didn't want to be influenced
    Last edited by mr. beaumont; 05-15-2021 at 04:17 PM.

  47. #46

    User Info Menu

    https://www.soundclick.com/artist/de...?bandID=562588

    Should be the first tune on the list. (EDIT: Now the one with the solo is second -- comping only is first).

    I know there's a better way to post this, but I haven't figured it out yet.

    I made my own backing track for this one. I exported midi from IRealPro into Musescore. Edited it trying to get a bass line and double time feel drums. I gave up on that and exported bass, drums and a tamborim pattern that I couldn't get any louder -- into Reaper. I then added the comping and the lead guitar, both with the Yamaha Pacifica 012 into the Boss ME80, right into the Focusrite 2i2.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by rpjazzguitar; 05-16-2021 at 12:57 PM.

  48. #47

    User Info Menu

    So here's an A section with chord tones. As you can hear I lost my way a little near the middle but picked it up again.

    Hard not playing vibrato as you can see by my half-hearted attempt. I caught myself going for it then got stuck in the middle

    All constructive criticism welcome


  49. #48

    User Info Menu

    Here's another crack at it, this time electric and a slightly different approach.



    PS: For this, I took one of the backing tracks on youtube, shortened it, slowed it down a hair, and made a vamp at the end (but still just a quick take, not endlessly laboring over takes). If anyone wants to use this as a backing track PM and I'll get it to you somehow.

  50. #49

    User Info Menu

    The clams are complimentary on our cruise ship


  51. #50

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Liarspoker
    So here's an A section with chord tones. As you can hear I lost my way a little near the middle but picked it up again.

    Hard not playing vibrato as you can see by my half-hearted attempt. I caught myself going for it then got stuck in the middle

    All constructive criticism welcome

    Tone is good. Note choices are solid. The only thing I would suggest is trying to make it swing a little harder. It's rooted in samba -- that is, dance music. Listening to samba drums might help a bit -- to get that syncopated dance feel into it.