The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary

View Poll Results: What do you prefer in music, originality or tradition?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Originality

    12 57.14%
  • Tradition

    9 42.86%
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Posts 26 to 50 of 75
  1. #26

    User Info Menu

    Do these copyists of Keith Jarrett also imitate the singing?

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #27

    User Info Menu

    I think a lot of us wanna say both, as in - "I'm borrowing from Tradition, but with my own unique and original spin"...
    But whether we're kidding ourselves or not, that may be for others to judge ...

  4. #28

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Litterick
    Do these copyists of Keith Jarrett also imitate the singing?
    No. Because singing is not part of the solo piano tradition.

    One question: Seriously?

  5. #29

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by princeplanet
    I think a lot of us wanna say both, as in - "I'm borrowing from Tradition, but with my own unique and original spin"...
    But whether we're kidding ourselves or not, that may be for others to judge ...
    I hear ya! lol It's okay to fail miserably, I do it on a daily basis. It's about the intent: do you want to reproduce the kind of music you like, or do you use the influences as building blocks to create something that is new, at least in your head?

  6. #30

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
    No. Because singing is not part of the solo piano tradition.

    One question: Seriously?
    He even got the playing position down sometimes.

  7. #31

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
    No. Because singing is not part of the solo piano tradition.

    One question: Seriously?

  8. #32

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vihar
    You cannot choose both, and your explanations of how you have/want both are not accepted. It's a tough world.
    I don’t prefer either one. It’s not a comparison that ever occurs to me and strikes me as dead-end now that I’m asked to make it.

    Even the most settled and old fashioned music was once brand new, and is always brand new to the person who is hearing it for the first time. And originality is only original in reference to something else, so it’s impossible to appreciate it without having at least engaged the traditional. So to even ask the question the way you do is to make all sorts of assumptions and beg all sorts of questions, in my mind not a worthwhile endeavor.

    What I do prefer is music that has a distinct personality that speaks to me as though direct from the heart and mind of the performer. So I love Wes, or Django, or Metheny, or Trane, or Ellington for reasons I ultimately don’t really understand myself. Tradition or originality are just words I stick onto them in a failed attempt to convey something that isn’t really verbal in the first place.

  9. #33

    User Info Menu

    Without tradition there is no originality.
    So what is tradition ? A norm ? What is normal ? Something that is like you ? What is different ? Another norm that's not yours ?

  10. #34

    User Info Menu

    They are like chickens and eggs.

    Originality becomes a tradition, which leads to new and different originality which becomes a tradition ...

  11. #35

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by orri
    They are like chickens and eggs.

    Originality becomes a tradition, which leads to new and different originality which becomes a tradition ...
    The inventor never becomes a traditionalist just because their music is copied by all the copycats.

  12. #36

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Lionelsax
    Without tradition there is no originality.
    A person who has never heard any music will still be able to create music if he was born to be a musical person. Besides all the "musical genes", he must have inherited tradition as well, going by what you're claiming.

  13. #37

    User Info Menu

    People are not tabula rasa. In that sense, previously acquired knowledge is given too much credit for, while inherited qualities are given too little.

    The Music in Your Genes

  14. #38

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vihar
    A person who has never heard any music will still be able to create music if he was born to be a musical person. Besides all the "musical genes", he must have inherited tradition as well, going by what you're claiming.
    Had Bach never heard music in his life and didn't have the centuries of musical ideas to build upon, could he have created as rich, sophisticated and elevated music? How about Django if he didn't have the Gypsy tradition and American jazz to build upon? Would Picasso been able crystalize the abstract essense of painting had he not absorbed the techniques and sensibilities of generations of painters across many cultures?

    You can always tell when someone is trying to be original but is not organized or disciplined enough to internalize what generations of geniuses have already accumulated. They either sound too simplistic or too incoherent.

  15. #39

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Tal_175
    Had Bach had never heard music in his life and didn't have the centuries of musical ideas to build upon, could he have created as rich, sophisticated and elevated music. How about Django? Would Picasso been able crystalize the abstract essense of painting had he not absorbed the techniques and sensiblilties of generation of painters across the world?
    I can answer this with as much certainty as if you asked it about a prehistoric, musical man, with barely any acquaintances. My answer is: yes, I strongly suspect.

  16. #40

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vihar
    I can answer this with as much certainty as if you asked it about a prehistoric, musical man, with barely any acquaintances. My answer is: yes, I strongly suspect.
    Music (or any art form for that matter) is not something to be discovered in the nature like a new element or a new planet in the galaxy. Artistic creativity is the very process of transforming what already exists. It's about playing around with the expectations and boundaries that are established with the existing art by bringing the right amount of twists while maintaining a coherent relationship with the contemporary context. Without constraints, there would be no art.
    Last edited by Tal_175; 01-17-2023 at 04:28 PM.

  17. #41

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vihar
    A person who has never heard any music will still be able to create music if he was born to be a musical person. Besides all the "musical genes", he must have inherited tradition as well, going by what you're claiming.
    That's an absurd statement. Can you name one person who never heard any music and then all of a sudden started making it because his/her musical genes kicked in?

  18. #42

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    That's an absurd statement. Can you name one person who never heard any music and then all of a sudden started making it because his/her musical genes kicked in?
    Aerophagia ?

  19. #43

    User Info Menu

    Just for fun--and because ChatGPT is a hot topic among educators (of which I was once one and to one I'm married)--I used the original post as a chat prompt. This is what the chapbot produced:

    As a language model, I don't have preferences. However, I can tell you that originality and tradition are both important in music. Originality allows for the creation of new and unique sounds and styles, keeping the genre fresh and exciting. Tradition provides a foundation of knowledge and techniques to draw from, and allows for the continuation and evolution of established styles. Both elements are necessary for the growth and development of any genre.

    Note the pseudo-self-aware disclaimer, followed by a bland and interestingly non-specific stock response.

    I also tried a variation on the topic: 50 word post on tradition versus innovation in jazz

    In jazz, tradition and innovation are often intertwined. While some musicians draw heavily from the past, incorporating traditional styles and techniques, others push the boundaries and incorporate new sounds and ideas. Both approaches are important in keeping the genre fresh and exciting.

    Exactly the kind of writing one gets from a student who isn't illiterate (though I did find a comma splice in one test response) but also hasn't really engaged the subject beyond some safe generalities.

  20. #44

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Lionelsax
    Aerophagia ?
    I love that band, but that singer dude looks like a lady.

  21. #45

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Tal_175
    Music (or any art form for that matter) is not something to be discovered in the nature like a new element or a new planet in the galaxy. Artistic creativity is the very process of transforming what already exists.
    Nature provides plenty of such stimuli, without even having to hear someone's records, a radio or someone singing next door.

  22. #46

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    That's an absurd statement. Can you name one person who never heard any music and then all of a sudden started making it because his/her musical genes kicked in?
    I like realizing absurdity in everyday life. I haven't yet made a search on whether a modern example of it existed, maybe it does. We'll see. The musical genes usually kick in at birth though. It's a form of giftedness.

    I would find it absurd if a baby wouldn't be able to vocalize melodies without hearing someone doing it in his/her presence first. All one learns from their peers is the local, peculiar lifestyle, for example feral children learn the "language" and habits of the surrounding animals.

  23. #47

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by John A.
    I love that band, but that singer dude looks like a lady.
    I love their song called "Love Is In The Air" !

  24. #48

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Lionelsax
    I love their song called "Love Is In The Air" !
    Please play it for us.

  25. #49

    User Info Menu

    “Music, the great communicator
    with two sticks we do it in the nature…”

    While we are indulging non falsifiable speculations regarding ancient man’s musical proclivities. my hunch is that music has always been social

  26. #50

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Vihar
    I like realizing absurdity in everyday life. I haven't yet made a search on whether a modern example of it existed, maybe it does. We'll see. The musical genes usually kick in at birth though. It's a form of giftedness.

    I would find it absurd if a baby wouldn't be able to vocalize melodies without hearing someone doing it in his/her presence first. All one learns from their peers is the local, peculiar lifestyle, for example feral children learn the "language" and habits of the surrounding animals.
    Too many double negatives there for me to be sure of what you're trying to say, so this may be an irrelevant response ... I'm skeptical there are literally music genes. There are genes for the anatomy that allows us to speak and sing, and there are probably genes for the perception of time, pattern, and repetition, but music itself is a product of culture. So even if there is a set of genes for making repeating patterns of sounds, it still takes society and culture for it to express itself in the form of music. Baby's are born with the ability (and compulsion) to imitate, and have anatomy that allows singing, so they imitate the songs they hear. But it doesn't follow from that there are genes for singing.
    Last edited by John A.; 01-17-2023 at 06:38 PM.