Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Posts 1 to 31 of 31
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    ##
    Last edited by CharlesC; 09-28-2019 at 12:54 AM.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    Just sensational. My favorite looking jazz box, and beautifully aged.
    Enjoy that thang!

  4. #3

    User Info Menu

    If the fingerboard has high/low spots, I definitely think a fretboard level at the time of refret is the way to go, assuming the person doing it is highly skilled. In my experience, you’ll always get the best result.

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    If the board is pretty straight a good refret/level should take care of any minor issues.
    As far as the nut goes, you can just put the orig in the case for down the road if necessary.
    I wouldn't hesitate to refret it to get it playing and sounding it's best.
    It looks great btw, nice color and dig the playing wear, looks like someone liked strumming over the fingerboard extension.

    Love my '64, had it almost 20 yrs now. It's a 5 piece carved neck but w/carved book matched back--as matter of fact the back, sides and neck look like they're carved from the same tree, tight curl all around.
    I've had other 60s L-5's but after getting this one home I was blown away by the sound, a quick check w/an inspection mirror revealed 2 PAF's, a nice bonus.
    I've had it refretted twice by now, just general maintenance imo.
    Observing as many pre '66 wide neck L-5's as I could over the yrs I've found there was a small window in '64 when Gibson used carved flame maple 2 piece backs and for some reason most of these L-5's have PAF's, have no idea how that happened as it's assumed they just randomly reached in a bin full of PAF and early PAT# p.u.s.
    Most pre '70 L-5CES humbucker equipped guitars have the lam back, not a bad thing, I own several other lam 60s Gibsons, not sure you can really tell a huge difference, likely varies from guitar to guitar.

  6. #5

    User Info Menu

    Just love these florentine cutaways. The cheery sunburst is great.

    Congrats for acquiring this beauty.
    Archtop YT Channel: www.youtube.com/+FredArchtop

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    Congrats on this fine looking instrument, if it sounds even half as good as it looks you're in tall cotton! Play it in good health :-)

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    You scored big time with this one ! Those late 3-piece necks are IT for me, they have just the right amount of heft, roundness and depth....
    Re the fret-work I would think that any minor bumps in the fretboard will be un-noticeable once the new frets are all set and properly leveled.

  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    Happy Vintage NGD!

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    Congrats !!

    As far as replacing the nut, if , after a good inspection, if your luthier says it's ok, then leave it. But make sure you give it a good look. I bought a '52 L-7 and had struggled with nagging set up issues with it, 'til I discovered the original nut had a hairline crack. After it was replaced, it was problem solved.

    Enjoy it !!

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    That is one sweet mamma. You found the holy grail, to be sure! With the right set up you'll be golden. As central as the nut is to the overall playing of the guitar, I'd likely want to spring for a new nut that is tailored to the new frets and other neck work you do. Just my opinion, though, and not the most "vintage" opinion you'll find here.

    Congratulations on finding the guitar of your dreams! I hope we'll get a clip--VIDEO of course so we can see this beauty in action!
    - Lawson
    "Whenever you come near the human race, there's layers and layers of nonsense." - Thornton Wilder, Our Town

  12. #11

    User Info Menu

    Congrats on scoring a beauty. May she inspire your playing for years to come. I would opt for the new nut (saving the old one in the case) and would have the board leveled with the new frets. Playability is more important than originality.
    _____________________________________________
    "When the chord changes, you should change" Joe Pass

  13. #12

    User Info Menu

    Very nice, congratulations!

  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    Always wanted one with the Florentine cutaway. Congrats :-) Someday, I will spring for one, but those seem to be around 14 to 18K in today’s market. Blonde would be lovely as well.
    It all works out in the end; if it's not working out, it's not the end.

  15. #14

    User Info Menu

    So when did they start making the skinny necks?
    -- Isn't it crazy that "archtop" and "luthier" are spelling errors on this forum?

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Woody Sound View Post
    So when did they start making the skinny necks?
    AFAIK in '61 they started the switch to the 5-piece necks which had a good width (but for some players they are a bit too shallow) up until late 1964 when pretty much all
    their neck shapes were narrowed. In any case it's very difficult to make a broader statement since Gibson's output went through the roof and things got quite chaotic re consistency etc. ....
    I've owned both an L-5 CES and a Super-400 CES from '68 and while these guitars had the narrow neck width they were nicely shaped in a meaty C - for me they were as playable and as good sounding as any other 60's archtop, better than a '67 Byrdland, a '67 ES-175, a '70 L-5 CES.
    The most comfortable neck shape for me was a '62 Super-400C which still had the early type 3-piece neck ... superb guitar but alas not suitable for stage work due to an extreme tendency for feedback. My current Super-400 CES is a '63 model and the 5-p neck is wide and more shallow. Still absolutely playable and not tiring but I had to adapt. The wonderful sound is a BIG motivator :-)

  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by gitman View Post
    AFAIK in '61 they started the switch to the 5-piece necks which had a good width (but for some players they are a bit too shallow) up until late 1964 when pretty much all
    their neck shapes were narrowed. In any case it's very difficult to make a broader statement since Gibson's output went through the roof and things got quite chaotic re consistency etc. ....
    I've owned both an L-5 CES and a Super-400 CES from '68 and while these guitars had the narrow neck width they were nicely shaped in a meaty C - for me they were as playable and as good sounding as any other 60's archtop, better than a '67 Byrdland, a '67 ES-175, a '70 L-5 CES.
    The most comfortable neck shape for me was a '62 Super-400C which still had the early type 3-piece neck ... superb guitar but alas not suitable for stage work due to an extreme tendency for feedback. My current Super-400 CES is a '63 model and the 5-p neck is wide and more shallow. Still absolutely playable and not tiring but I had to adapt. The wonderful sound is a BIG motivator :-)
    5 piece necks introduced about late '63 early '64.
    Nut widths narrowed mid-late '65 to mid '69

  18. #17

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by wintermoon View Post
    5 piece necks introduced about late '63 early '64.
    Nut widths narrowed mid-late '65 to mid '69
    I stand corrected.

  19. #18

    User Info Menu

    Most from the mid to late 60s have narrow necks, but there are many exceptions to that rule. I’ve seen L-5s and Super 400s with necks as wide as 1 3/4” from that period.

  20. #19

    User Info Menu

    Beautiful guitar! I would definitely have a new nut made. Bone is my preference. Congratulations, and play it in good health!
    Best regards, k

  21. #20

    User Info Menu

    "
    I have to agree with Gitman on this one. I believe 5 piece necks started in '61. I have had the opportunity to play a '61 with a five piece neck. Most of the '62's and almost all of the '63's I have come across had 5 piece necks. Here is a killer '62 they had over at Norm's last year"

    interesting, I have a pair of '63 Super 400's w/3 piece necks that are very '59 ish profiles, so they're not leftover stock.
    the serial numbers fall about 1/2 way through 1963. I've seen a few other L-5's and Supers from '63 w/ the same 3 piece rounded necks. go figure....
    I might not have paid enough attention to '61 or '62 necks as most are like a tapeworm, not for me.



  22. #21

    User Info Menu

    I love Florentine L5’s and Super 4’s.........SWEET !

  23. #22

    User Info Menu

    Gorgeous guitar. Congrats.

    Way off topic....:-) But wondering about the black chairs/stools in your studio photos. Just what I'm looking for...do they have a back rest? What is height? Can I ask where you got them?

  24. #23

    User Info Menu

    Beautiful to say the least, BIG congrats.

    And excellent questions to ask here, I'll be learning from the answers as well.

  25. #24

    User Info Menu

    Congrats on the real beauty ..

  26. #25

    User Info Menu

    you can clamp it down and run a hair dryer over it
    that might work for awhile, but it might warp again.
    but anytime applying heat to nitro be very careful it doesn't catch on fire, that stuff is caustic as hell.
    I don't even bother anymore, I just play 'em as is.

  27. #26

    User Info Menu

    try this : clamp it between a piece of wood and a sheet of thick glass and place it in the sun for a while. As far as I know plastics don't have a "memory" like other materials have so it should not warp back. I have successfully straightened out several pickguards (single layer and sandwich versions) that way.
    BTW: I've had pickguards from US and japanese origin warp and gas out/deteriorate , also from the 80's and 90's but the original marbled guard on my Super400 looks as good as new .... it's a total toss up in my view.

  28. #27

    User Info Menu

    What a stunner. Personally I always care way more about the playability, so any changes or updates are fine with me.

  29. #28

    User Info Menu

    I'd probably fill the holes on the bridge or just use another base, they're easy enough to find.
    But it wouldn't kill me to have the holes.
    I'd leave the ones in the guitar alone, as you said, they're covered anyway.

  30. #29

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesC View Post
    So it's at the shop now getting frets and a new unbleached bone nut, can't wait. The bridge on this guitar was pinned down. It looks like it was done very early on and done well, two very small gold screws. I removed the screws and just left it floating. My tech mentioned filling the holes on the bridge and possible the guitar itself. What do you guys think? It didn't really bother me aesthetically with the holes on the bridge and of course, you can't see the ones in the top. Thoughts? Fill them or let it be? Thanks, as always!
    Hey, Charles. Congratulations on the guitar! I'm in Austin. Just curious who is doing the work for you on your L5? Thanks!

  31. #30

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by CharlesC View Post
    Also, let me know if you would like to jam sometime. Always looking to hang and meet new players in town. If you are up for coming out sometime, I have several shows around Austin this month. Thanks!
    Thanks, Charles. I'll send you a PM.

  32. #31
    Beautiful! Congrats, HNGD and play her in good health!
    Midnight Blues