-
My first Gibson archtop.
I used to play a Gibson Les Paul Standard for long time but sold it for many years and i currently own a Gibson SG, a custom made Chinese 18" no-cutaway archtop by Mr. Wu/Yolanda Team and a custom made Chinese Archtop made by Yunzhi.
I'm very pleased with my new guitar and the thin body depth plays and feels very comfortable. This is a 25.5" scale which i like alot and a 17" wide body. I'm not as knowledgable about guitars, but i believe this one is the altered version of a Gibson Byrdland? I have seen the Byrland guitar a few times in the local shop, but have never tried it. I think the short scale neck looks a bit weird...to short. But i can't tell how it plays with such short neck.
Anyway, here's a pic of my new guitar:
-
07-05-2018 02:13 AM
-
I have always wondered why this model is not more popular. It certainly checks a lot of my boxes. Is it neck heavy?
-
Those are awesome guitars. I can't for the life of me figure out why Gibson won't make a new 350 of some kind.
-
Happy NGD!
-
No, the neck is not heavy at all.
Actually, the guitar body/neck weight relation is perfectly balanced. I play standing and there is no 'neck drop' so-to-speak.
The neck profile is slim and feels right.
-
Originally Posted by nopedals
No, the neck is not heavy at all.
Actually, the guitar body/neck weight relation is perfectly balanced. I play standing and there is no 'neck drop' so-to-speak.
The neck profile is slim and feels right.
-
Enjoy your gorgeous guitar.
-
Originally Posted by Woody Sound
The thing is, is that i was at first interested to buy the new Gibson ES-275, however so far i could find out the es-275 has a "Historic truss rod". I don't know what it is and i thought that maybe the neck is not adjustable like with a regular truss rod. Plus i prefer a bit larger body width, so the 17" of the es-350 is what i like best.
-
What a lovely guitar! Congratulations, and play it in good health!
-
Originally Posted by JB108
-
Originally Posted by Woody Sound
-
Originally Posted by Woody Sound
-
Great guitar! Congratulations!
The 350t has a thin body doesn't it? (as opposed to the full depth body of the Tal Farlow.)
-
Lovely guitar, congrats
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Nice! Congrat's.
-
Congrats. Beware though. Gibson archtops are like beautiful women. Their allure is captivating and the net result can be a fiscal nightmare (but well worth it!).
May she inspire your playing for many years to come!
-
Originally Posted by Little Jay
-
The Historic Truss Rod has no plastic or rubber sheath. It supposedly leads to a more historically correct tonality, if there is such a thing.
Nice guitar. It is the ES5 minus the middle 3rd humbucker or a Tal Farlow in simpler clothing. But Gibson should bring the ES-350 back.
PS The Tal Farlow has a 3" rim depth, doesn't it?
-
Originally Posted by Little Jay
The Original short scale 350T was popular with a number of blues men and rock and rollers - among them B.B. King and Chuck Berry. Many of them swapped to the 335 - 355 series semi hollow when it became available in the late 1950s - again among them King and Berry - and the short scale 350T didn't survive as a model long after that.
-
Originally Posted by Jabberwocky
-
Originally Posted by oldane
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Originally Posted by JB108
-
That is so nice. Hold on tight, seems like they're getting hard to find. Love to hear it.
-
10-15-2021, 07:03 AM #24Dutchbopper Guest
Congrats on the new guitar. I used to own a 1992 Gibson ES 350T that sounded just fine.
DB
Playing live and getting the best sound from the...
Yesterday, 02:08 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos