The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary

View Poll Results: Jazz guitarists do you prefer sold body or hollow body?

Voters
514. You may not vote on this poll
  • I prefer solid body

    81 15.76%
  • I prefer hollow body

    433 84.24%
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Posts 126 to 150 of 168
  1. #126

    User Info Menu

    Years ago I got a basic Artcore hollow body just to see if I would take to it, after (many) years of playing solid bodies exclusively. Well, I couldn't put it down, and my beautiful old Heritage 150 (Les Paul) started gathering dust pretty quickly, despite its ability to deliver very workable jazz tones with flatwounds on the Schaller neck pup.

    I'm fully aware of Ted Greene and Ed Bickert's amazing (archtop-like) Tele tones, but when I plug in my Japanese 80s Strat, (which is fitted with a twin rail HB in the neck pos., and my only current solid body), I'm like ok, fair enough, could get by in a fix (ie, not inspired), unless we're talking funk, where it shines. Maybe fusion, too, but don't play a lot of that right now.

    IME, a decent hollow body just delivers more note depth and sounds more alive and vibrant. I haven't played any football stadiums of late, so cannot comment on differences at that volume level.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #127

    User Info Menu

    I recently picked up both a Telecaster and a Jazzmaster (Squier) and after popping TI 112 flats on them, I love how they play and sound. I still love my archtops, but these two solid-bodies are already much loved members of the "herd."

  4. #128

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Lobomov
    You don't find the jazzmaster tone to be too scooped? ... More chicago blues than mid-heavy jazz?
    It's not an ES175 with hum buckers, to be sure, but I do like the tone a lot. Maybe it's the amp I play through?

  5. #129

    User Info Menu

    Lawson,

    The Jazzmaster is a neat guitar. With flats it's just killer. Enjoy.

  6. #130

    User Info Menu

    I sold my Tele and currently have one guitar, a nice strat. With the little jazz if I turn down the guitar volume just a touch and the tone a bit it sounds great to me for how I go. I don't gig so don't need an arch and a driving cap for style. .

  7. #131

    User Info Menu

    Even at home you still need the cap.

  8. #132

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Greentone
    Even at home you still need the cap.
    Nothing says "It's time to play!" like putting on the cap.

  9. #133

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by citizenk74
    Nothing says "It's time to play!" like putting on the cap.
    Jazz Guitarists - Hollow Body vs Solid Body Guitars-2019-06-08-10-35-46-png

  10. #134

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ruger9
    Hello all, first post...

    I've been wondering about this... I'm looking for a guitar that can do jazzy stuff as well as stuff with a little grind to it. Not straight-up jazz, I'm talking western swing/honky tonk/rockabilly type stuff. For those of you who might know some of these artists: Wayne Hancock, JD Mcpherson, Asleep at the Wheel...
    I would check out the hotter TV Jones PUs. I can not remember the name of the one I have: could be either powertron or supertron, but it is the one with the blades. That works for me because I still get some of the the high frequency stuff but it has enough tight low end extension to sound full. I have it on a LP. I always want to buy another set for different guitars but I like having different things happening on my different guitars. Another PU to look at is Fralin P92. It is not as extended in the low end, but it has some mid range push, with a nice upper range. Those are my thoughts.

  11. #135

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by st.bede
    I would check out the hotter TV Jones PUs. I can not remember the name of the one I have: could be either powertron or supertron, but it is the one with the blades. That works for me because I still get some of the the high frequency stuff but it has enough tight low end extension to sound full. I have it on a LP. I always want to buy another set for different guitars but I like having different things happening on my different guitars. Another PU to look at is Fralin P92. It is not as extended in the low end, but it has some mid range push, with a nice upper range. Those are my thoughts.
    Wow, thread resurrection!!

    Since posting this, I have been through many Filtertron-sized pickups in my Thinline Cabronita: TV Jones various Filtertrons, TV Jones T-90s, TV Jones T-Armonds, and finally Rio Grande BBQ'Trons.

    For the original tone I was after- the old-school jump-blues honky tonk thing, the T90s and Rio Grandes were great (the guitar still has the Rio grandes in it). The T-Armonds are gorgeous sounding pickups, but sound a little too "normal tele" for me (because I already have that tone in a normal tele). And in general, I'm not a fan of the mid-scooped sound of Filtertrons (the Rio Grandes are wound hotter than anything TV Jones makes, except for the Powertron+, and have plenty of mids... the Rio Grandes sound closer to P90s or PAFs than they do to filtertrons. )

    Now, in my GRETSCH Hot Rod (which I talked about in the previous post), long story short, I have grown the like the TV Jones Brian Setzer Signature filtertrons in that guitar. BUT- I also installed a Tone Switch, which is a low pass filter.... it has 2 positions that work well to remove the ultra-highs the Filtertrons have. Altho I also have sitting here a set of Vintage Vibe (Pete Biltoft) P90s in the Filtertrons covers that I will someday try in the Gretsch... I've always loved the Gibson hollowbody P90 tone (think ES-295), and was hoping I could get a little more of that flavor out of my Hot Rod... we will see...

  12. #136

    User Info Menu

    I've never been comfortable with the way a solid body feels, probably because I played only flat top acoustics for years before needing an electric for a country band gig. I did like the sound of the Telecaster I used then, but if I had to use one again, I'd consider adding a double body, much like Clarence White but without the b-bender, just a frame to make it more comfortable.

  13. #137

    User Info Menu

    For me a thinline hollowbody – more specific: my ES-330. For the kind of jazzy thing we do I set it up with flatwounds.

  14. #138

    User Info Menu

    I have and make solid, chambered and semi hollows and have two carved archtops , for Jazz I prefer the carved arch tops.

    My simple philosophy : The more air in the body , the more air in the note . I like the openess of the archtops

  15. #139

    User Info Menu

    My favorite jazz has always been played on archtops. Heck even my favorite swing and jump blues.

    But then I see a video like this, and it makes me realize... once again... hollow is not necessary, and solid can sound great.

    "It's not the plane, it's the pilot" (cheesy quote from Top Gun Maverick LOL)


  16. #140

    User Info Menu

    I don't play my big Hollow Body Archtops much, as they give me a bad back after a few hours playing. Pity, because I have some nice archtops. So, at present I'm using smaller solid body guitars and sit up straight for my playing.


  17. #141

    User Info Menu

    I go back and forth. The acoustic archtop is perhaps more unique and suited (for me) to acoustic jazz, but when I try to amplify it I quickly understand how the solidbody electric came about. Feedback control.

    It's a similar difference between a double bass and an electric bass; they are just two distinct instruments. The shape of the notes are different. The acoustic archtop and the double bass have a more percussive attack and less sustain.

    So I like both. I've been thinking of trying a Casino Coupe (the smaller version of the Casino) just to try out a hollowbody electric.

  18. #142

    User Info Menu

    As I get older and my left hand pain increases, I find that I can only keep up with a professional gigging schedule using lighter strings. I find that anything less than 11's on an archtop results in a thin tone. Solid Body guitars can handle 10's just fine due to their increased sustain, so I have been using solid Body guitars more and more. They don't do rhythm guitar very well and do require a slightly different technique than the archtop guitar, but we have to do what we have to do.

    At this point, I need both in the jazz guitar toolbox.

  19. #143

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by supersoul
    I go back and forth. The acoustic archtop is perhaps more unique and suited (for me) to acoustic jazz, but when I try to amplify it I quickly understand how the solidbody electric came about. Feedback control.

    It's a similar difference between a double bass and an electric bass; they are just two distinct instruments. The shape of the notes are different. The acoustic archtop and the double bass have a more percussive attack and less sustain.

    So I like both. I've been thinking of trying a Casino Coupe (the smaller version of the Casino) just to try out a hollowbody electric.
    Those Casino Coupe are really cool. If you like the Casino vibe. I have played a few Coupe. I was about to buy a used one. It was getting a little buzz on some notes. I have a soft/controlled touch. Typically if I am getting buzz it is due to a problem. Often a little adjustment will fix it. Since I knew the tech, I had him look at it. The frets were uneven. Having that problem taken care of would of cost too much, in regards to the price of the guitar. Just throwing out that info, so you can find one that is ready to play.

    (I having been wanting a Casino for a zillion years. I have played a bunch but there were always something… on the inexpensive ones, I always felt like the PUs needed to be changed. The master built one, I think was priced too expensive. The vintage one was too expensive. I ended up with a Eastman Romeo LA).

  20. #144

    User Info Menu

    I'm puzzled. This poll is 11 years old and asks one of the most obvious questions around for this crowd. Just some 140-odd replies. The Forum supposedly has a five-digit number of members. All undecided, or an irrelevant question?

  21. #145

    User Info Menu

    Maybe a semi-hollow option would have made a difference.

  22. #146

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyBoden
    I don't play my big Hollow Body Archtops much, as they give me a bad back after a few hours playing. Pity, because I have some nice archtops. So, at present I'm using smaller solid body guitars and sit up straight for my playing.
    Much the same for me these days. The GB10 is the biggest guitar I can comfortably play, at least seated which is most of the time, rather than my full-size archtop or dreadnought. My low back and sciatica just starts to hurt from the compromising position*. With my solidbodies (esp my Stratishcaster) or my semi hollow classical (Rick Turner RN-6), I can play much more comfortably for longer. And I have come to find that I can better approximate the sound in my head with those instruments them with my full size carved top- partly because they seem to work better for fingerstyle playing.

    And they all sound better if I am wearing the cap.


    * my wife refers to these complaints as the "organ recital."

  23. #147

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Cunamara
    My low back and sciatica just starts to hurt from the compromising position*.

    * my wife refers to these complaints as the "organ recital."
    HAHAHA good one!

  24. #148

    User Info Menu

    I'm kind of surprised that folks have trouble with an arch top sitting down. With me it's just the opposite. I sit up straighter with a bigger body. With LP's or a telecaster, I tend to hunch over the smaller body more when sitting. So I tend to stand with them more, but I also play different music on them and make use of those physical gyrations from my adolescence more.

    D size Martins, I have one and that's getting a bit to deep for me for comfortable playing, I much prefer the ergonomics of a 000 size guitar (I prefer the sound as well). And I don't think I could make it to an 18" arch top, 17" is about my max.

  25. #149

    User Info Menu

    They're all guitars, man. There is no wrong answer.
    Play a bunch of 'em and get the one that keeps you up at night.

  26. #150

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by bluejaybill
    I'm kind of surprised that folks have trouble with an arch top sitting down. With me it's just the opposite. I sit up straighter with a bigger body. With LP's or a telecaster, I tend to hunch over the smaller body more when sitting. So I tend to stand with them more, but I also play different music on them and make use of those physical gyrations from my adolescence more.

    D size Martins, I have one and that's getting a bit to deep for me for comfortable playing, I much prefer the ergonomics of a 000 size guitar (I prefer the sound as well). And I don't think I could make it to an 18" arch top, 17" is about my max.
    Sometimes it's not about the back, it's about the shoulder.

    Me, I can't play an archtop very well standing up, but I know most people here don't even try that LOL