The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Posts 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    hi, I am considering buying a late 70s Ibanez hollow body (gibson copy) - any general views on the quality of these guitars? Anything in specific I should look out for? I’m assuming they are pretty good and well built - at least as good as Gibson! - but I have no experience at all with this…any guidance for me before I buy? Thanks!

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    Make sure the binding isn't cracking because it'll only be a matter of time before it starts flaking/chipping off, a common problem w vintage Japanese guitars.

  4. #3

    User Info Menu

    I owed a 2355 (ES-175 copy) from this era that I would describe as okay. It had very nice flame maple laminate but it never played as well as I would like and just showed bits of sloppy workmanship here and there. This guitar was certainly not as good as most Gibsons I’ve played although it sounded pretty dang close to the real thing after I put a 57 Classic in the neck. Before that I owned an early 80s AS200 that was as well made as any guitar I’ve owned or played but I didn’t bond with it. Long story short I wouldn’t pay a premium for Ibanez of that era and certainly I would want to see and play the actual instrument before buying.

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    I have owned, and regret deeply selling, a few 2616 and 2355 models that were superb guitars. The binding rot as already mentioned by wintermoon and separations at the neck-to-body area are places where these (and other old guitars as well) can have problems due to long term mechanical stress. If you are buying online, ask for detailed photos of the neck and ask about the truss rod.

    Lastly, are you buying this as a player guitar or collector? For the latter expect that many of these vintage ibanez guitars have had some modification so you need to know if the original parts are included with the sale.

    good luck and let us know how your quest turned out!

  6. #5
    Thanks for this info guys - very clear and helpful! I’m buying to play but the seller says all original and it looks in very good shape from the pictures….I”ll ponder a bit and then let you know if I buy… Thanks again….

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    Very nice guitars, my first archtop was a 2355 I sold it to buy my 88' ES175 (classic move). The comparison doesn't last, my gibson is a way better guitar. But I still regret selling it as the Ibanez was also a very nice "go to" guitar, with a thinner neck, a "funkier" sound. Do not consider it as a ES175 copy but as a good guitar with it's own personality. Try it, and if the neck suits you go for it. They still have a good resell value if you change your mind (around 1200 euros i would say).

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by wintermoon
    Make sure the binding isn't cracking because it'll only be a matter of time before it starts flaking/chipping off, a common problem w vintage Japanese guitars.
    Not to mention vintage American guitars. It's inherent to the binding material manufactured at the time and can affect any brand guitar. But rebinding a D'Angelico or D'Aquisto, even an L5, is financially worth it whereas with guitars of lesser value the cost/benefit gets murkier as the resale value is lower.

    I have a 1981 Ibanez GB10NT; there are some discoloration of the binding in spots, but thus far no cracking, crumbling, delaminating, etc. If it was a sunburst finish, it wouldn't even really be very noticeable; but because the discoloration of the binding extends into the surrounding wood, it shows up more readily on natural finish instruments.

  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    Watch for evidence of pickguard out-gassing. 70's Ibanez guitars were notorious for this as well as the aforementioned binding rot and discoloration. Quality improved dramatically during the 80's forward.

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    My mid 1970s 2355 was pretty well built, but off just a little. Nothing I could not fix:

    Pots too high value, measured 1k-> new electronics installed
    Pickup off center -> re-drilled holes and re-installed pickup ring in correct location
    Frets too low -> refretted

    Otherwise a very nice guitar. Sounds and looks very nice. So much that I put off buying a real ES-175 for 20 years. 1992 to 2012.

    Late 1970s Ibanez hollow-body quality?-dsc_0074-jpg

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by icr
    My mid 1970s 2355 was pretty well built, but off just a little. Nothing I could not fix .... Otherwise a very nice guitar. Sounds and looks very nice. So much that I put off buying a real ES-175 for 20 years. 1992 to 2012.
    Ditto for me, I have the 1970's Japanese ES-175 copy discussed in this video, the binding and neck are good.


  12. #11

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Mick-7
    Ditto for me, I have the 1970's Japanese ES-175 copy discussed in this video, the binding and neck are good.

    Does the Cortez have a soundpost and is the guitar the same dims as a Gibson?
    My Japanese copy is slightly thinner than my '63 and it has fake HBs!
    Thanks

  13. #12

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    Does the Cortez have a soundpost and is the guitar the same dims as a Gibson?
    My Japanese copy is slightly thinner than my '63 and it has fake HBs!
    Thanks
    Yes, it has a sound post but it's just a dowel, similar to a violin sound post. I've heard that the pickups on the Japanese copies are usually inferior to Gibsons, this is true of mine. My Cortez guitar has a narrower neck than I like (I'm over 6' tall and have long fingers), guess they modeled it after the thinner neck Gibson ES-175's. However, the body dimensions appear to be the same.

    The guitar in the video looks just like mine although mine is in better shape. I was told it was manufactured in the mid' 70's, problem is they did not put serial numbers on them (as far as I know) so dating them is very difficult. I've had it for over 20 years.

    Here's another video on the history of Japanese made guitars by the same guy who made the Cortez video:


  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    I play a 2616 pre-serial. Like it a lot. All original. No binding problems at all.
    Never played a gibson. Can afford it but my playing isn't worth it. I often get inspired by the sound of my 2616 and jp20.

  15. #14

    User Info Menu

    I also have an Ibanez 2616. It is a fabulous guitar. The original pickups with the Ibanez inscription are great. No issues with binding, neck or pickguard. But to avoid surprises, try it out before you buy.

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    I have a '78 Ibanez FA-100 I bought after having gone through 2 Gibson 175s in the late 80's. I got it for a Yes cover band gig and love it to death. I've never had an issue with the binding, though I did have the pots changed out to better ones about 20 years ago or so. Lovely figure on the top as well


  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    I had a mid-70s 2355 for a while (in the mid-70s). Easy to play, sounded nice through my '60s Ampeg Reverberocket. Only issue was it was a few cents flat at the octave, but that could probably have been fixed if I tweaked the bridge location. Wound up trading it for an Ovation classical with a pickup that was better suited to my playing at the time. I wouldn't hesitate to pick up another one if I came across one at a decent price.