The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Posts 51 to 75 of 386
  1. #51

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by customxke
    Ok…I’m lousy at this, but will give it a try with the hope that my ineptness will embolden others to join in.
    Yea... go for it... But man I love that guitar.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #52

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by AllanAllen
    Cool, I want to listen to the version you like so much.
    It's not so much that I love that particular version, it's typical old Hollywood schmaltz really...but the chords are beautiful, particularly the bass movement in the second half...

    Of course, playing this style of rhythm guitar, bass movement isn't really the most important thing, so like I said, I'll stick to the accepted "jazz changes" for my first run through at least.


    Here's me playing the original changes, but in Bb (the normal key)


  4. #53

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
    It's not so much that I love that particular version, it's typical old Hollywood schmaltz really...but the chords are beautiful, particularly the bass movement in the second half...

    Of course, playing this style of rhythm guitar, bass movement isn't really the most important thing, so like I said, I'll stick to the accepted "jazz changes" for my first run through at least.


    Here's me playing the original changes, but in Bb (the normal key)

    Wonderful, very tasteful.

    I don't understand why there's so much negativity around this song normally.

  5. #54

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
    It's not so much that I love that particular version, it's typical old Hollywood schmaltz really...but the chords are beautiful, particularly the bass movement in the second half...

    Of course, playing this style of rhythm guitar, bass movement isn't really the most important thing, so like I said, I'll stick to the accepted "jazz changes" for my first run through at least.


    Here's me playing the original changes, but in Bb (the normal key)
    Ahh, I'm getting it now.


    pawlowski6132
    I mean, it's just not for me. It sure seems like EVERYONE else likes it a lot and everyone has a classic version. It's a me problem I guess...

    All I ever thought was that it was a generic movie theme turned into a forgettable ballad.

  6. #55

    User Info Menu

    Ok, Stella part 1. This one will need a few visits.


  7. #56

    User Info Menu

    I thought I'd try something like Freddie Green-type comping. As someone who spent 50 years supplying bass and rhythm with my guitar – think oom-chunk – it's really hard to leave out the low end, and try to just play 3-note comping for rhythm.

    It's especially hard when one is playing by oneself – we like to put the root in for reference, but in a combo that already has a bass player, that would get in the way.

    I tried Lady Be Good in F, since that's the key I sing it in. Since the chords I'm playing at the beginning give no hint of the key, I start with a little 8 bar intro that gives an idea of the key center. Also, my Triggs New Yorker isn't set up for acoustic playing, with relatively low action and flat wounds, but you get the idea.


  8. #57

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Ukena
    I thought I'd try something like Freddie Green-type comping. As someone who spent 50 years supplying bass and rhythm with my guitar – think oom-chunk – it's really hard to leave out the low end, and try to just play 3-note comping for rhythm.

    It's especially hard when one is playing by oneself – we like to put the root in for reference, but in a combo that already has a bass player, that would get in the way.

    I tried Lady Be Good in F, since that's the key I sing it in. Since the chords I'm playing at the beginning give no hint of the key, I start with a little 8 bar intro that gives an idea of the key center. Also, my Triggs New Yorker isn't set up for acoustic playing, with relatively low action and flat wounds, but you get the idea.

    Sounds great...intro is a great way of setting up the key.

  9. #58

    User Info Menu

    Hey guys!
    Cool to see the rhythm Camp going on!
    I played a gig in Luxemburg yesterday, and snagged some clips for you.
    This is me playing some rhythm for a dance Party. Whole Band played unamplified.

    The tune is called "the big Apple Routine"

    Paul

  10. #59

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    Hey guys!
    Cool to see the rhythm Camp going on!
    I played a gig in Luxemburg yesterday, and snagged some clips for you.
    This is me playing some rhythm for a dance Party. Whole Band played unamplified.

    The tune is called "the big Apple Routine"

    Paul
    Wow. So awesome!!!

  11. #60

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    Hey guys!
    Cool to see the rhythm Camp going on!
    I played a gig in Luxemburg yesterday, and snagged some clips for you.
    This is me playing some rhythm for a dance Party. Whole Band played unamplified.

    The tune is called "the big Apple Routine"

    Paul
    Was hoping we'd see you here! Sounding great as usual.

  12. #61

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    Hey guys!
    Cool to see the rhythm Camp going on!
    I played a gig in Luxemburg yesterday, and snagged some clips for you.
    This is me playing some rhythm for a dance Party. Whole Band played unamplified.

    The tune is called "the big Apple Routine"

    Paul
    Excellent! Page turn at 2:50? Can you remind me what Eastman you have again? Every time I see
    one of your videos I get the itch.

  13. #62

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by AllanAllen
    Excellent! Page turn at 2:50? Can you remind me what Eastman you have again? Every time I see
    one of your videos I get the itch.
    You got me there! Yeah, had to turn pages. I'm the last one in my Band still playing from paper, but I think I'll be making the switch to an Ipad soon.

    My guitar is actually a Baton Rouge, but I often just describe it as an eastman, because it's easier. It's a prototype model under the BR Label that never went into production. When I bought it I was told it was built by Eastman and I think it's fair to assume so. I guess it's a slightly modified Version of an AR805.
    The Summer of Rhythm Guitar 2024-wa_9f3647bd-jpg

    It's been serving me quite well for the last 10 years!

    Paul

  14. #63

    User Info Menu

    It's a beauty! I'm a sucker for that Eastmany-red finish with the lighter binding – it's essentially the same as the finish on my Eastman AR905CE CC custom.

    And the punchy sound you get out of your BR is great, and your rhythm is unimpeachable.

  15. #64

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Ukena
    It's a beauty! I'm a sucker for that Eastmany-red finish with the lighter binding – it's essentially the same as the finish on my Eastman AR905CE CC custom.

    And the punchy sound you get out of your BR is great, and your rhythm is unimpeachable.
    Thank you very much!
    Yeah I totally agree! It's hard to beat those Eastmans. I kinda lucked out with this one though. If I were to design a custom guitar this one would already be pretty close.
    I like that you describe it's sound as "punchy" (I think so too) . The Eastmans are often described as too bright, which might be true, but I still think they're a great match for FG-style comping!


    I just uploaded another Clip from yesterdays gig:


    Paul

  16. #65

    User Info Menu

    Great punch. Is it parallel braced?

    Really doesn't sound like most Eastman's I've come across, which have that Benedetto thing going...very pretty sound, actually. But this is the...correct sound. I can that action's up there a bit as well.

    Can you talk a bit about chord voicings? I'm hearing 4th and 3rd string, but are you getting the 6th in here sometimes as well?

  17. #66

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    You got me there! Yeah, had to turn pages. I'm the last one in my Band still playing from paper, but I think I'll be making the switch to an Ipad soon
    It’s great to see someone having the same problems as I do.

  18. #67

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
    Great punch. Is it parallel braced?

    Really doesn't sound like most Eastman's I've come across, which have that Benedetto thing going...very pretty sound, actually. But this is the...correct sound. I can that action's up there a bit as well.

    Can you talk a bit about chord voicings? I'm hearing 4th and 3rd string, but are you getting the 6th in here sometimes as well?
    I tend to forget things like that, but I think it's X-braced actually. Will have a Look again, when I get home from work. It also has a fairly thin top, I believe those are both factors that are usually attributed to result in that Benedetto Sound. Don't know why it sounds the way it does. I'm using heavy 80/20 Bronze strings, don't know if these are the reason for that sound.

    By the way: I think you Sound amazing on that old Kay! I hear a lot of those "Cello-Qualities" there!

    Yeah, my action is kinda high, although it's still comfortable for me. I played with a higher Action for quite a while, but in the end realized, that I don't need to proof anything. I now go for the lowest action that doesn't buzz when i hit the strings with max. force.

    Re Chord-Voicings:
    I'm sure I'm at least fretting the 6th string*. I think you can see in the clips i posted, that i have my guitar placed at quite an angle on my lap. I think I barely hit the 6th string in that position. I think what i play is mostly 3rd string with "a bit of" 4th string.

    *I'm not sure if this is the traditional way to do it, but I always fret the low E-string, regardless of the root. That means for all voicings with root on the A-string I'll go for the 5th on the low E.
    So for Amin6 and D7 I use the exact same voicing. It's not like I'm really playing (like audible) the lowest note anyway, but even if it comes out audible I'm at least not doubling the Bass. I also think it's easier to mute the other strings like that.

    Paul
    Last edited by Webby; 06-10-2024 at 08:56 AM.

  19. #68

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    *I'm not sure if this is the traditional way to do it, but I always fret the low E-string, regardless of the root. That means for all voicings with root on the A-string I'll go for the 5th on the low E.
    So for Amin6 and D7 I use the exact same voicing. It's not like I'm really playing (like audible) the lowest note anyway, but even if it comes out audible I'm at least not doubling the Bass. I also think it's easier to mute the other strings like that.

    Paul
    Follow up on this. Do you adjust for a Dm7b5 or just fret the natural 5 on the E knowing you won't hit it? If I do the later I don't have to flip my hand from middle finger on E to ring on E, but I am unarguably grabbing the wrong chord.

  20. #69

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by AllanAllen
    Follow up on this. Do you adjust for a Dm7b5 or just fret the natural 5 on the E knowing you won't hit it? If I do the later I don't have to flip my hand from middle finger on E to ring on E, but I am unarguably grabbing the wrong chord.
    Really good question!
    I do adjust for a b5, so for example Dm7b5 = Ab6.
    One reason is that I just really want to do everything "right" and also like the challenge a bit.
    The other (and more important) reason is that I feel like it makes a difference somehow. I feel like fretting the chord creates a different Sound, even if everything except for one note is muted. I think Jeff also stated this in his observations at some point. I can't explain why, but there is a difference for me.

  21. #70

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Webby
    Really good question!
    I do adjust for a b5, so for example Dm7b5 = Ab6.
    One reason is that I just really want to do everything "right" and also like the challenge a bit.
    The other (and more important) reason is that I feel like it makes a difference somehow. I feel like fretting the chord creates a different Sound, even if everything except for one note is muted. I think Jeff also stated this in his observations at some point. I can't explain why, but there is a difference for me.
    Lightbulb moment for me with that Ab6 bit.

    4x35xx
    3x34xx
    3x13xx

    That's some nice easy grips for a minor ii V i.

  22. #71

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by AllanAllen
    Lightbulb moment for me with that Ab6 bit.

    4x35xx
    3x34xx
    3x13xx

    That's some nice easy grips for a minor ii V i.
    That's exactly how I'd fret that!

    Paul

  23. #72

    User Info Menu

    Today's musings.

  24. #73

    User Info Menu

    Interesting about the pick. I use Fender Heavy pearloids, turns out they're .96mm. I had just assumed I was using a "light for jazz" pick based on some of the stone, and bluechip options I've seen here.

    The Summer of Rhythm Guitar 2024-098-0351-905-jpg

  25. #74

    User Info Menu

    Stone and wood picks are awful.

    Bluechip is snake oil, in my opinion. Very clicky. Hated the one I had, lost, found, tried again, hated again.

    The 0.94mm would not be my go to for plugged in jazz, or single note playing...for that I still like the 1.5mm Pro Plec the best.

    Rhythm guitar, however, sounds best to me with a pick with just a little "give." I think I've concluded I want the thickest pick I can use that isn't completely rigid.

    I also use the round end for rhythm. Much better sound.

    All of this IMHO, YMMV.

  26. #75

    User Info Menu

    I think picks are a personal thing like strings, whatever one likes is fine for the job. It's nice to compare notes though.