So I'm the original owner of a strange Takamine bird from 1985 an EF-381 M.
It's an archtop per se, but equipped with a flat top glued bridge and round sound hole.
I have a historic attachment to it. However, acoustically it's nothing spectacular.
Originally the piezo system made it come alive when amplified.
In 2009 a reapir job ended up replacing the bridge and killed the piezo.
My main question is,
can I remove the glued bridge, fill the holes left by it,
add a trapeze tailpiece and a floating bridge + electric flatwound strings
and try to add a pickup to get as close to a floating humbucker pickup sound
as possible?
Are there laws of physics here I am unaware?
I know the floating neck pickup would be tough to pull off
I am including some pics including a bad photoshopped mockup of the end result that willupset the photoshop gods out there.
Any repair/luthier hands on ppl opinion would be welcomed.
MUCH more trouble and work and expense than it'll be worth ! This is actually a rare bird, the prototype of which was made for Ry Cooder back in the day....
- In order for a floating bridge to function properly the neck-angle has to be more steep than on a regular flattop.
- There won't be enough clearance for any floating pickup. Have you tried a soundhole pickup ? The old DeArmonds are quite cheap and sound absolutely cool !
- The bracing of an archtop guitar differs radically from that of other types.
- I've not handled this guitar personally but my guess is that the top is pressed, the arch quite shallow and it was never designed as an acoustic performer.
Let this one stay as it is and save up for a real archtop- plenty of affordable and good-sounding/playing models are available. The easiest and cheapest solution : get a soundhole
pickup designed for steelstrings (with adjustable poles) and plug in !
Probably there is not enough room vertically for a typical archtop type bridge. I would expect that the conversion, various customizations, and costs would be much more than the result would be worth. The OP also said, "acoustically it's nothing spectacular." If it's nothing spectacular now, then extensive modifications will just make it an expensive "nothing spectacular".
Additionally, the OP wrote "Originally the piezo system made it come alive when amplified." Why not have someone install a new, high-quality piezo system? That would be cheaper than the extensive modifications the OP described, and would be more likely to have an acceptable result. You could instead install a high-quality soundhole pickup like a Sunrise - relatively modest price, minimal modifications, likely acceptable result.
This Tak is not an L5 and will never approach the sound of an L5. If an archtop is what you want, buy an archtop.
Well, you've cleared the fog in my mind. Although there is a slight downward angle, it would not be sufficient to accommodate a floating bridge, you are right. And, yeah, a combo of flatwound strings and a sound hole mag pickup, may get it to sounding decent. Thank you for your advice.
Yeah, sure don't want a "an expensive "nothing spectacular" " ! Lol. I don't know where this category of guitar falls into.
Reminds me of an austrich. A bird with wings that cannot fly. That being said, a good mic would give it a boost. Thank you.
A soundhole pickup, as has been noted, will get you amplified in a economical fashion. Radically changing the basic geometry of an acoustic guitar is not advisable. Reversible mods are best mods, IMHO. Get the most from what you have, and save coin for something else - there are many, many good options these days. good luck in your quest!
Interesting ... I saw a guy play one of these at a jam recently and wasn't sure what it was. Now I know. Very cool idea (people often wonder why Gibson never made a 330 with humbuckers).
Well, IIRC, TIs are the only nickel wrapped flatwounds. So that makes a difference. Although I was thinking more broadly than just flatwounds, since I don't like 'em very much.
I tried some kind of half-wound (half-ground?) phosphor bronze strings and don't exactly understand what went wrong. I think the wound string diameters resulted in different spacing of the the steel...
FYI. In many of his gigs around the country, Julian Lage either borrows a local amp or uses a Fender Champ. I once read he used a ZT Lunchbox at one of his. So, it's not the amp. It's us.
Yeah LOL true, why a Hendriksen at home where you don't have to carry it anywhere?
I can see the potential for it being OK in a mix with lots of other stuff going on, but I'm going to take a big...
up for sale is a 1949 gibson es-5. it is one of the 12 prototypes made in june of 1949. serial number a-3335. these are extremely rare, of course....it is 100% gig ready with a new fret job...
Yeah, most boppers like to play horizontal lines, but forcing yourself to stay in position, while sometimes harder, has the payoff where the ideas, devices, lines etc can become "moveable". If you...
Anybody tried the D'Addario Half Rounds or have any thoughts on them? I'm thinking of trying them (12-52 w/wound G) on my incoming GB10. Or should I just bite the bullet and go with the TI 12s? Will...
Found a consignment 2022 sunburst Ibanez GB10 at Dave's Guitar Shop and made an offer which was accepted. Shipping out tomorrow I hope - should have it by the end of the week. Was real impressed with...
My 2018 Memphis 330. They did a year of 330s studios with humbuckers as stock. I like the extra resonance and light weight of the fully hollow construction. I replaced the stock burstbuckers with...
Here's a 2022 ES-335, which has been significantly improved. Just a great guitar. 7 1/2 pounds, '50s neck. Added '80 Shaw pickup set, refret (no nibs), refinish, replaced wiring loom, '50s long...
It's beautiful. What kind of rig are you playing through and how do you like the Seth's? I found them too bright for my Edwards E-SA. Not sure if it's cause of the solid maple top rather than...
1949 gibson es-5 prototype
Yesterday, 10:55 PM in For Sale