-
Ken Parker & Woody Pfifer
Erich Solomon
Claudio & Claudia Pageli
Bill Comins & Anthony Lattanze
Brian Kingston
Benoit Lavoie
Maegan Wells
Linda Manzer
Dale Unger
Mirko Borghino
-
10-29-2018 08:14 PM
-
Some look good and some look really ugly. Nothing stands out too much just on looks to me based on what I see.
-
-
Dale Unger's guitars sound and play great, FWIW.
-
I like the look of some of those Brian Kingston guitars. Ken Parker has made several archtops that I would love to try.
-
Originally Posted by Greentone
Keith
-
Looks like a fantastic showcase. Amazing photos!
-
Originally Posted by deacon Mark
yep, agree..
like the look of the erich solomons, but who knows how they sound??
and the benoit lavoies..which have that vintage euro vibe
other than that. eh
underwhelmed...tho supportive!!! always
cheers
ps- (iim) great original post and pics..thanks!!!
-
Some strange looking horns there. I don't see anything I really like.
-
With a few exceptions most of these are intentionally "different". They're not trying to look like guitar XYZ. Just the opposite.
I call them "keepers", because while many are no doubt "good" to "fine" to "very fine" guitars, when it comes to resale it will likely (a) take longer to sell, and (b) result in a greater loss, or at least lower profit.
The simple truth is that things haven't changed very much in 60 years. Gibson, Fender, Martin, and few others will likely perform better in resale scenarios relative to others.
There are a few exceptions in the price stability arena for fine archtops of course, if one will/can wait for the buyer.
That said, I like:
the blue/green Pageli,
the bass by Lavoie,
the oval hole by Borghino.
-
Thank you for the photos.
Verrrry interesting.
-
Thanks for posting this, it's a nice treat.
-
I guess I'm too much of a 'traditionalist' and, while not being an archtop player, I do have a great appreciation for them and the great builders (Gibson, D'Angelico, Benedetto, D'Aquisto, Stromberg, Campellone, etc.) who built them. That being said, if the look gets too far away from the classic L5 or 175 format, I lose interest in a heartbeat. Some of these guitars look like they were left out in the sun to melt - not sure why they were even built that way as it probably wouldn't have a marked influence on volume or tone - maybe just to be different as someone said.
-
I'd love to try one of the Woody Pfifer guitars. Ronny Jordan just sounded so amazingly good playing a Pfifer.
-
Originally Posted by Skip Ellis
When you look at the real success stories you see something in tradition yet move a step away from outright copy. When Jimmy D'aqusto made is Advant Garde and change the F holes it still was a hit with me. Not because he was Jimmy D' but that things were still basically the same with refinements. Much the same with John Monteleone and now Bryant Trenier.
A flat out copy done perfect can get a builder a good name and reputation but it does not always mean complete success. At some point it is nice to see the individual style breakthrough and reveal something better. Mark Campellone has done this with his guitars and his are very Gibson but also very Campellone. I personally am not a fan of sharp cutaways they take away the symetry my eyes like. Some really like them but at least they fall within the standard look.
When F holes start moving around and become anything else I begin to get skeptical. The stardard is still set and none of these guitars made with sound holes that are not traditional have not done much for me. The exception is Jimmy D and his design but again he keep them in "place." Jimmy's worked but he is the one who could manage this with this skills and knowledge.
Bill Hollenbeck made a guitar called Fluer-de-lis with not F hole but a fluer-de-li pattern in the lower bout treble side and upper bout bass side. It looked fine and sound good but was not the sound is traditional guitars got. He himself thought the sound was a bit too bright not one of his favorites. He did it for Martin Taylor and I not sure whatever happen to the guitar. I would like to get it I don't believe Martin has it anymore but unsure.
At some point it is hard to come up with anything new but that is the challenge. It is much like playing the guitar itself, especially jazz guitar, trying to find your own sound that works. To make and analogy between playing and building. At some point I like to simply here a nice melody, they do not get old even over the years. Just think of a tune like Beautiful Love. Nice melody and sometime I have no desire to mess with too much by playing too much. Same as with a guitar. Many times I just want to hear a fine acoustic sound like a Super 400 or L5, 4 bar rhythm or just comping a nice tune. Simple and straightforward.
-
I liked most of them. A few were a bit too weird but for the most part I liked them...variety can be nice. I really liked the Comins oval hole. Thanks for posting the pics so we could sort of live vicariously.
-
Thanks for posting Bob. It is always interesting to see where the art of the archtop is at present. That said, I echo the sentiments of Deacon Mark. Give me an archtop guitar built in the tradition. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
-
I don't understand why archtop makers feel they have to come up with unique designs. You don't see violin, cello, piano or horn makers try to "re-invent" the cosmetics of the instruments like it's a fashion show. And these instruments have been around for much longer than archtops and electric guitars have. It's the craft beer mentality I guess, like the way they try to stand out in the competition by excessive use of hops.
All these "modern" designs are solutions to non existing problems in my opinion.
-
Bob, Thanks for posting these pics. I look at these shows as kind of the custom car shows i.e. show what you can do. I for one like the differences and different approaches to archtop design. While not every one floats my boat I like that they tried. A world where every guitar was a L5 would be a dull world as far as I'm concerned.
By the way, were you able to check out Maegen Wells' guitars. As you have varied and in my opinion exquisite taste I'd be interested in your opinion or for that matter of any builder that stood out.
-
Rob, no I unfortunately did not audition either of Maegen’s 15” guitars this time. My friend Ken however bought the purple guitar that she exhibited. In terms of archtops, I was able to audition some of Bill Comins, Linda Manzer and Erich Solomon’s guitars. There were some fantastic concerts and impromptu duets at parties in the evenings with Steve Herberman and Ted Ludwig (fantastic!).
Originally Posted by rob taft
-
Originally Posted by rob taft
Cars go though constant technological progress and their aesthetics change model after model to emphasize that. Not many believe instruments today are fundamentally superior to how they were made traditionally. That's why the cosmetic changes seem gimmicky to me. But again that's just my taste.
L5? Actually a lot of archtops look like slight variations of the L5 design. Most Ibanez, Eastman, Guild etc. models retain L5's design features but come with varied size, depth, pickup configuration, carved vs laminate etc. Which is not dull to me as I really like the classic L5 looks.
I certainly had fun looking at the pictures of these alternative designs though.
-
Well that is interesting because I am not a car guy as such but give me a classic Corvette for style. Lots of cool stuff out there but I still like a nice Corvette.
I hope Hot Ford Coupe does not give me the business too.
-
Originally Posted by iim7V7IM7
-
Thanks for posting these pictures. It is good to be reminded that, for all that the archtop guitar market is small compared to other types of guitars, we are still spoiled for choice at all levels. And shows like this are an opportunity for makers to see and hear what others are doing and to learn from these experiments to the benefit of all.
-
I like the Manzer best
Grant Green, What is This Thing
Today, 01:59 PM in Ear Training, Transcribing & Reading