It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > The Jazz Guitar Forum > Theory

Play What You Hear Guitar Course


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2010, 08:52 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 185
Default Melodic and Harmonic minor scales. What Shapes?

I am going to learn the Melodic and Harmonic minor scales and all the
modes. Can you recommend what "shapes" I should learn "first"?

I say first because I want to get some set shapes down first
before going beyond that.

Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2010, 09:41 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 425
Default

Take whatever fingerings that you already know for major scale derived sounds and alter the notes as needed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2010, 10:58 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 185
Default

I was hoping for this answer!!

makes perfect sense too.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2010, 10:59 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 185
Default

anyone applied the Jimmy Bruno 5 shapes to the melodic and harmonic minor?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2010, 03:52 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wi
Posts: 129
Default

How long have you been playing? It's awesome that your asking so many questions. You can tell you're really hungry for knowledge. but there's a reason jimmy only has 5 shapes. That's all you need to create any shape. If you know the scale degrees of all the notes in those 5 shapes and the intervals that build a major scale, then its time to make your own shapes; like bako said.

Memorize the structure of the scale you want to play.
Melodic jazz minor = 1, 2, b3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Harmonic minor = 1, 2, b3, 4, 5, b6, 7.

If you need visual copies write them out on fretboard diagrams. This approach gives you a much better knowledge of the fretboard. It's not really the shape that's important any way. It's understanding how it got that way. It's like reading the first and last chapter of a book. Here are the main characters....here's where they end up. How'd they get there? How did they avoid a dissonant outcome?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2010, 07:16 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 171
Default

If I remember correctly, Emily Remler uses 2 basic shapes.

For example, D melodic minor starting at the 5th fret, 5th string.
She starts at the 5 fret and plays the scale starting with the little finger, playing the scale towards the headstock.

Then she plays it starting with the index finger and goes the other direction.

She does the same thing for D melodic minor starting at the 6th string, 10th fret.


Makes any sense?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2010, 08:13 AM
BigDaddyLoveHandles's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 2,717
Default

Note that there's nothing mystical about "5". Some methodologies have more, some less.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2010, 09:11 AM
FatJeff's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 976
Default

Yes, I've altered the Jimmy Bruno 5 Shapes for melodic minor. But the introduction of the b3 fundamentally changes the way the scale lies under your fingers. So, the resemblance to the 5 Shapes that Jimmy espouses (which are based on the major scale) is not all that strong...the fingerings change. I did find it helpful to derive the melodic minor shapes by myself, based on the Bruno shapes. However, I don't think of the melodic minor shapes I use in relation to the major shapes as taught by Jimmy. I think of them as two separate entities, for better or for worse.

There is another fundamental difference between the Bruno shapes and the melodic minor shapes...the Bruno shapes all relate back to a major tonality, and the melodic minor shapes I'm using all relate to a minor tonality. Remember that when dealing with minor tonalities, Jimmy teaches you to think of the related major. So if you're playing A natural minor, you're really in the key of C as far as Jimmy's shapes are concerned. I suppose you could try to relate the melodic minor shapes to Shape 6 (natural minor), but now you have two different notes (6 & 7) instead of 1 (3). I suspect that would introduce its own difficulties.

Interestingly, the MM shapes I came up with are exactly the same as the ones Don Mock uses in his book on MM. So I guess I'm doing something right. Or, at least something that Don Mock does - which is good enough for me right now.

BDLH is right, there's more than one way to skin a cat. JB's 5 Shapes and CAGED both have 5 shapes to learn. I'm not familiar with other systems, but 5 is a manageable number for me, so that's what I work with. Seems to cover the fretboard pretty well.
__________________
♫♪ FatJeff ♫♪
http://www.youtube.com/user/jwright123456789
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2010, 04:00 PM
randalljazz's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: anchorage, alaska
Posts: 710
Default

'cuz there are five different pitches of open strings, so any great number of fingering patterns for anything would be extensions or duplications...
__________________
"Every time I've ever met anyone in a creative field who was flamboyant and absolutely sure
of himself, I've always discovered there really wasn't any valid talent in his existence."
-- Stan Kenton


www.randalljazz.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2010, 10:47 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobsguitars09 View Post
I am going to learn the Melodic and Harmonic minor scales and all the
modes. Can you recommend what "shapes" I should learn "first"?

I say first because I want to get some set shapes down first
before going beyond that.

Thanks!
I learnt the 5 shapes of all the scales from Dave Celentano's book 17 years ago. I suppose you're only talking about shapes on the fretboard, right?
Bako's right when he says "Take whatever fingerings that you already know for major scale derived sounds and alter the notes as needed".
I took the shapes Dave shows in his book from the pentatonic scale as the "skeleton" for the major scale and after "turned" them into the harmonic and melodic minor scales, always using the pentatonic as the "skeleton" for them. If you mix both scales (melodic and harmonic minors) you'll get the harmonic major scale. It was a surprise for me! You can also take the harmonic minor and convert it into, what I call the harmonic minor pentatonic. It's like the pentatonic but with the harmonic minor "skeleton" and also, what I call, the harmonic minor blues scale, it has a 4 notes chromatism. Try them, maybe you'll like them!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-28-2010, 10:16 AM
derek's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: KC area
Posts: 3,976
Default

Clearly there are many ways to skin a MM scale. However, I am a big fan of just altering what you already know. By far, the biggest hurdle in playing jazz is the muscle memory required to play these various devices we use for improvising.

If I can just alter something I have already spent countless hours on to produce the new pitch collection, I think that is working smarter, rather than harder. That is of course, unless the afore mentioned alterations create an unwieldy shape. YMMV
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-28-2010, 10:37 AM
BigDaddyLoveHandles's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 2,717
Default

Has this been said? It's not enough to "know a shape"; you have to know the function of the notes in a shape. For example, here's a G major scale:




||---|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-X-|-X-|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-X-|-X-|---|-X-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|-X-|---|---|---|---|



You need know what each note is:




||---|---|-R-|---|-2-|---|-3-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-5-|---|-6-|---|-7-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-3-|-4-|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-7-|-R-|---|-2-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|-6-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-R-|---|-2-|---|-3-|---|---|---|---|



Then it's easy to go to a jazz minor: flatten the 3rd:



||---|---|-R-|---|-2-|-m3|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-5-|---|-6-|---|-7-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-m3|---|-4-|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-7-|-R-|---|-2-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|-6-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-R-|---|-2-|-m3|---|---|---|---|---|



Another approach is via the relative major. Take that same G major shape and thing of it as E natural minor:



||---|---|-3-|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-7-|---|-R-|---|-2-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-5-|-6-|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-2-|-3-|---|-4-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-6-|---|-7-|---|-R-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-3-|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|---|---|---|



Now raise the 6 & 7 to get E jazz minor:




||---|---|-3-|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-M7|-R-|---|-2-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-5-|---|-M6|---|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-2-|-3-|---|-4-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|---|-M6|---|-M7|-R-|---|---|---|---|
||---|---|-3-|---|-4-|---|-5-|---|---|---|---|



Last edited by BigDaddyLoveHandles : 05-28-2010 at 10:43 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-28-2010, 09:01 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLoveHandles View Post
Has this been said? It's not enough to "know a shape"; you have to know the function of the notes in a shape.
That's the point of course...and also to know the note names. That's something I studied for a long time otherwise I'd be sauntering all along the fretboard.
My post was to help bobsguitars09 the way he asked: "Can you recommend what "shapes" I should learn first?",...because I don't know if he can find all notes and the intervals on the fretboard.
The rest comes later if he wants to learn the shapes first.
I don't write much here but I enjoy many threads you all write.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2010, 09:19 PM
FatJeff's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 976
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derek View Post
Clearly there are many ways to skin a MM scale. However, I am a big fan of just altering what you already know. By far, the biggest hurdle in playing jazz is the muscle memory required to play these various devices we use for improvising.

If I can just alter something I have already spent countless hours on to produce the new pitch collection, I think that is working smarter, rather than harder. That is of course, unless the afore mentioned alterations create an unwieldy shape. YMMV
That was kind of the point of some of my earlier musings - for me, at least, altering the major scale by flatting the third actually introduces enough difference in the way it lays out on the fingerboard that I feel more comfortable just thinking of it as an entire separate entity.
__________________
♫♪ FatJeff ♫♪
http://www.youtube.com/user/jwright123456789
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-31-2010, 06:40 AM
shoome's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: germany
Posts: 90
Send a message via ICQ to shoome Send a message via MSN to shoome
Default

i memorize those shapes based on the major scales like some/most people here do ... here is a little chart that i made for myself. (red dots-root, blue dots-b3 from mm). (If the pic is too big, pls tell me and ill just link it...)


I tried to memorize separate mm-shapes but i just wasnt able to get it done as smoothly as with this approach. It just comes down to the way you like to think of the mm-scale :-)

Last edited by shoome : 05-31-2010 at 06:55 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-31-2010, 08:47 AM
merseybeat's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 353
Default

Oohh All those Augmented arpeggios! I need a shower!

Eddie
__________________
Please contribute to my Web Jam
www.jazzsession.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-01-2010, 06:10 PM
bass2man's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Default

Thanks for sharing the diagrams Shoome..I was just starting to diagram out the MM scale based on the 5 forms of the CAGED major scale patterns i.e. Jimmy Brunos method...pretty easy to remember as the note patterns on each string, i.e. whole-whole, half-whole, whole-half, etc. repeat themselves just like in the major scales...the only difference is that I add the G and A on the 6th string and the B on the 5th string in form 5, the first diagram in your MM chart...key of C.

Thanks again.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-02-2010, 04:32 AM
shoome's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: germany
Posts: 90
Send a message via ICQ to shoome Send a message via MSN to shoome
Default

no prob bass2man and yes, those 3 notes and maybe even the low F (in the Key of C) should definitely be added!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2010, 06:26 AM
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 7
Default

To me what works best is playing 3 notes per string, always, that helps my picking and it's easy to run through the whole fretboard and easier to memorize.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-06-2010, 09:09 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Default The Five Basic Shapes, Harmonic & Melodic Minor

I'm New Here, just joined, have been a member of the Yahoo Jazz Guitar site for years. I feel OK about pushing my website because it's free to anyone who's trying to learn. I enjoy and need feedback from those who stop over because it helps me to develop and focus the content of the site.

I'd also like to add that I can see that there's a lot of knowledgeable players on this forum, and my approach is not meant to "trump" anybody Else's.

Dave Woods Jazz Guitar Starting Right
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-07-2010, 06:35 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
Default

There is no need for the melodic minor shapes. The shapes cover all scales. The important thing about scales is that they analyze a sound. If you use the outside note B nat through a Cm7 chord you have the melodic minor sound. You learn a scale to produce a sound. Or I think the sound gets used and then theory makes a scale from it. Goes way back to pre classical period.

It's almost like "What came 1st? The chicken or the egg.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-07-2010, 09:34 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Default

Hey are you Jimmy Bruno?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-07-2010, 10:29 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltar Hornbeek View Post
Hey are you Jimmy Bruno?
YES
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-07-2010, 10:30 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Yes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-07-2010, 10:50 AM
FatJeff's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 976
Default

Very cool, good to have Jimmy in the forums with us!
__________________
♫♪ FatJeff ♫♪
http://www.youtube.com/user/jwright123456789
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-07-2010, 11:45 AM
wizard3739's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Payson Arizona
Posts: 952
Default welcome

Welcome aboard Jimmy!

wiz
__________________
Howie
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:58 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 185
Default

This is GREAT!! thanks for posting Jimmy.

How would I apply this method (everyone) to the seven modes of the melodic
and seven modes of the harmonic minor scales as far as the harmonized
scales for these go with all the chords?

what I mean is.. if there are 7 modes for each scale and I want to learn all the chords and so on for each mode
how would I apply 5 shapes to this if there are 7 modes? how do I begin to approach playing through the 1 and 4's?

Last edited by bobsguitars09 : 06-08-2010 at 01:04 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-08-2010, 03:08 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Bob, I think you are slightly confused. All 7 modes have the same 7 notes which is the collections of tones in the tonal center
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-08-2010, 06:07 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoome View Post
i memorize those shapes based on the major scales like some/most people here do ... here is a little chart that i made for myself. (red dots-root, blue dots-b3 from mm). (If the pic is too big, pls tell me and ill just link it...)


I tried to memorize separate mm-shapes but i just wasnt able to get it done as smoothly as with this approach. It just comes down to the way you like to think of the mm-scale :-)
Can anyone clarify this for me? I was auditioning for my schools jazz band yesterday and they told me to play a G melodic minor so I played one of the shapes that was posted above and they said something like that you have to ascend major and descend minor and I had no idea what they were talking about
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-08-2010, 06:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wexford, Ireland
Posts: 652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christien View Post
Can anyone clarify this for me? I was auditioning for my schools jazz band yesterday and they told me to play a G melodic minor so I played one of the shapes that was posted above and they said something like that you have to ascend major and descend minor and I had no idea what they were talking about
Nearly- the Melodic minor is a natural minor scale with raised 6th and 7th ascending and a natural minor when descending . But in the "Jazz" melodic minor, it's the same up as down.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be