Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
03-11-2009, 06:16 PM
| | | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 76
| | How do you use the "Thesaurus of scales and melodic patterns"? How do you use the "Thesaurus of scales and melodic patterns"?
has anyone made lesson plans or anything out of this book?
It fascinates me! | 
03-11-2009, 08:43 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | If your talking about the Slomninsky book, There's lot's you can do. The idea is to analize the pattern. Figure out what it's about.
But that's key with any melodic pattern. See what makes it tick and fool with it like figure out the scale and scale degrees and then change the scale but keep the degree's (ie. make a Cmajor pattern a C harmonic minor pattern and then a C melodic minor pattern or even modes or whathave you) | 
03-12-2009, 06:30 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 154
| | I was talking to a friend about this a few days ago. we went through the glossary and tested each other on the terms in the glossary. we found that something quite complex sounding is simply a minor 3rd for example.
I dont ever use this book for anything musical. i think that i might discover one of these scales by just playing and then i would call it something that the book wouldnt call it.
for me the book makes complexities of things that, for me, dont need to be so complex. not to say that the book isnt a work of art.
Bailz | 
03-12-2009, 08:32 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | I agree. There could be many different names for a scale , especialy some of the pentatonic variations.
After going through a few different types of scale systems, (5,6,7 &8 note systems) I've learned not to worry about the name but more about how they function.
If you think about onlt three types of sounds, major, minor and dominant , you can pick 3 scales for your reference point. (major, mixolydian and minor) and reference just about every other scale as one of those three but with some king of alteration to one f the other notes in that scale.
Lydian sound, Think major scale with a raised 4th. Dominant lydian sound, then it's mixolydian with a raised 4th
If you hear say , major with a b2 , flamneco type, play a major scale with a b2. If you also hear this same scale with a lydian flavor as well, then sharp the 4. Who cares what it's called. It's what it sounds like.
Last edited by JohnW400 : 03-12-2009 at 08:34 PM.
| 
03-12-2009, 09:09 PM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,075
| | Yes the terminology is a little over the top for the dinner table but he explains all the terms clearly. He presents several interesting methods of generating patterns, scales and note collections. It was intended as a resource book for the contemporary composers of the late 1940's. It can also serve as a tool for improvisors. There is no more methodology in the Thesaurus than there is in a dictionary. Play,analyze and experiment with material from different sections of the book. Apply in tonal and less tonal contexts. Keep what you like and ignore the rest. | 
04-01-2009, 10:32 AM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 133
| | There is a useful section of the book that has arpeggio patterns for polychords, with obvious applications for altered chords/stacked triads...the twelve tone patterns are also useful for coming up with some out of the box melodic ideas... | 
05-22-2009, 07:50 AM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Belgrade Serbia
Posts: 5
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnW400 If your talking about the Slomninsky book, There's lot's you can do. The idea is to analize the pattern. Figure out what it's about.
But that's key with any melodic pattern. See what makes it tick and fool with it like figure out the scale and scale degrees and then change the scale but keep the degree's (ie. make a Cmajor pattern a C harmonic minor pattern and then a C melodic minor pattern or even modes or whathave you) | does Anybody have Slomninsky book. | 
05-22-2009, 08:15 AM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | I think you can get it from Amazon.com. I'll check around and get back to you | 
05-22-2009, 08:19 AM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Belgrade Serbia
Posts: 5
| | many thanks | 
05-22-2009, 08:36 AM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | | 
05-22-2009, 08:49 AM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Belgrade Serbia
Posts: 5
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnW400 | ok, thanks for information , but I thought that you send me link to "free dowenload". Unfortunately in my country, I can not buy books over internet site. | 
05-22-2009, 09:15 AM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | Look up "thesaurus of scales and melodic patterns" on Google. About 3 pages in there are some links that say free download. I haven't doen that so I cannot say whether or not they work. You can also try on scribd.com. | 
05-22-2009, 09:32 AM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Belgrade Serbia
Posts: 5
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnW400 Look up "thesaurus of scales and melodic patterns" on Google. About 3 pages in there are some links that say free download. I haven't doen that so I cannot say whether or not they work. You can also try on scribd.com. | I have found  this book on scridb.com, but i can`t download  . Can you halp me | 
05-22-2009, 10:19 AM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,880
| | Sorry, I don't know how to download at that site either. perhaps someone else in this forum can help with that | 
05-22-2009, 03:46 PM
|  | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Seattle
Posts: 655
| | it's exactly that, a thesaurus. use it as you would any other thesaurus. or just transcribe some interesting sounding music and you'll get some new words. | 
05-23-2009, 06:32 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: www.myspace.com/carlosmcepinha
Posts: 14
| | I think it's a vocabulary book. A thesaurus of vocabulary. You got stuff like ultrapolation/intrapolation for example. All of them in the key of C. Then you aply those 'pattern' examples to given scales or anyother you like.
In the and, the book gives the most complete studdy of melodic combinations. Tons of combinations of melodic notes. It's all about that, all the melodies that can be made on the guitar.
The book is not making it look dificult or complicated, is just givin tons and tons of melodic possibilities, and also tools to develop more melodies. I just had a quick look over some pages... | 
06-11-2009, 10:05 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Brasil
Posts: 7
| | where can I download this book? | 
08-31-2009, 09:56 AM
| | | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by memyselfandus How do you use the "Thesaurus of scales and melodic patterns"?
has anyone made lesson plans or anything out of this book?
It fascinates me! | There are several approaches, and each one depends on your level at the present time.
For a first attempt, I suggest the ear approach (as that's what it all comes down to anyhow) and that is: Play each pattern within each designated heading against each chord quality in all 12 keys. For example, you might begin a single pattern as is, ( non transposed) and play it as is against Cmaj7, C#maj7, Dmaj7...etc. Then C7, C#7, D7, Eb7....etc. C-7...C-7b5...Cdim7...Cmaj7#4 etc, etc. Add alterations as you go along. Do this for every pattern you wish and as far into the book as you desire. Then try to place each pattern into a a mock improvisational scheme; ii, V, I, for example et al.
It is all in the ear in the long haul. The common mistake is getting so hung up in the math and permutations that little time is left for application, assimilation, and above all; music.
-TD | 
08-31-2009, 09:58 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Decapriology1 There are several approaches, and each one depends on your level at the present time.
For a first attempt, I suggest the ear approach (as that's what it all comes down to anyhow) and that is: Play each pattern within each designated heading against each chord quality in all 12 keys. For example, you might begin a single pattern as is, ( non transposed) and play it as is against Cmaj7, C#maj7, Dmaj7...etc. Then C7, C#7, D7, Eb7....etc. C-7...C-7b5...Cdim7...Cmaj7#4 etc, etc. Add alterations as you go along. Do this for every pattern you wish and as far into the book as you desire. Then try to place each pattern into a a mock improvisational scheme; ii, V, I, for example et al.
It is all in the ear in the long haul. The common mistake is getting so hung up in the math and permutations that little time is left for application, assimilation, and above all; music.
-TD | Welcome to the group TD.  | 
02-09-2010, 08:33 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
| | right now i can't understand this book | 
02-10-2010, 08:09 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
| | I use it once in a while for technical exercise. I don't really "hear" or feel those lines and so it doesn't really work it's way into my improvisational style for that reason, I think. For me, it's an exercise book. | 
02-10-2010, 08:17 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Rainbow Village, USA
Posts: 2,571
| | I bought that book a few years ago, looked it over once, and immediately put it on the shelf. It's not been opened since.
The problem is that there is just too much stuff in there, and I can't figure out how to make anything musical out of it. As I've found out since purchasing the book, you don't need a million scales to sound good. Just a few will do, and I can get these elsewhere with an actual explanation (e.g. Levine's book). | 
02-10-2010, 09:37 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 677
| | You don't need it. | 
02-10-2010, 01:42 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
| | Agreed with FatJeff basically. That's it. It's an overwhelming amount of material actually that would just, for me anyway, get in the way and probably do more harm than good. | 
02-10-2010, 07:17 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 677
| | You can use it as a doorstop. | 
09-01-2010, 07:59 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 128
| | Hi,
as I just got this book, here are my 2 cents :
- some famous players and improvisators (Zappa, Coltrane, Shawn Wallace, to name a few) are known to have used efficiently this book, so I doubt it is something that could do you harm
- at first glance I also thought it won't be useful for me, and I couldn't relate it to the usual sequences used in jazz (ii-V-I, etc.)
- the terms used there seem very complicated but also very precise, so I guess it is his author's personal way to conceive the music, not better or worse than any other, just different
- I just tried today a few examples from the beginning and I found those interesting to hear and practice
So I would say this books seems full of fresh musical ideas, fingerings I'm not used to, and it is also interesting to try and understand how those lines are created (I'm pretty sure some terms like "infra_inter_ultrapolation", even if they are explained at the beginning, will become clearer with experimentation.
I've seen a few vids on youtube with "licks" from or inspired by this book, but the guitar sound didn't please me
Have swing
Guelda
[Edit] I forgot : Steve Vaļ and John Coltrane used this book too ! | 
01-09-2011, 09:41 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
| | my 2 cents I've owned this book for a few years now. I know a lot of great players who use it, and many famous ones as well, like Zappa, Joe Diorio, Stern, Coltrane, etc. Although i have no doubt that if you invest time and thought into this book, it would yield some interesting and usable results, i have just not remained sufficiently interested in it to devote that time. A few years ago, i started to put the examples into a separate manuscript book in one octave, treble clef, just to condense it. after a few pages I would stop and play through each one a few times, and try to relate it to various chords. it was interesting, but ultimately i just lost interest. I know joe diorio used it a lot, and i'm a big fan of his, but i'd rather just go through his books and pick out stuff i like, and ditto with coltrane, stern, etc. I just think it was way too much work for questionable results, and it's not my way of learning. i'd rather play or transcribe a solo i like, and then take what i like from it. I always feel like i should give it another shot, out of guilt or feeling like i'm missing something, but really, i doubt i'll ever use it much. | 
01-09-2011, 09:56 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,936
| | There's a dude that teaches guitar at my store that was big into that book back in the late 70's. He busted out some really cool patterns that sounded very 20th century classical. It was impressive. I asked how he could use them in less symmetrical forms to improv over standard jazz changes, and it suddenly sounded a little less musical. The 8-note symmetrical dim coltrane-style runs fit V7 chords ok, but that was it, really as I recall. I think it might be over the top.
I prefer a reductionist standpoint; how much can you milk from a few basic scales. I only use these scales: 1. Chromatic (to connect other scales/modes,etc) 2. Major + Modes
3. Phrygian Dominant
4. Melodic Minor + Modes
5. Diminished Octatonic
6. Whole-tone
These fit everything I want to say in music thus far. I'm sure sifting thru every subset out there will yield some interesting results, but that's not for me. | 
01-09-2011, 10:49 PM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 207
| | "You can use it as a doorstop."
+1
__________________ Spiderman needs no fancy suit or gadgets plus he's a jazz guitar fan | 
01-09-2011, 10:55 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
| | looking thru my notes, i marked a few that sounded cool over an altered 5th in a V7 I; #1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 53, etc. they also yielded some interesting chords when i fooled with the notes. but, as i mentioned earlier (under sawbuck. for some reason i'm having trouble logging in), i don't know how much time i'd want to spend digging in and deciphering this whole book to sort it all out. maybe a little here and there, but don't think i'd want to devote so much time to it.... | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |