It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > The Jazz Guitar Forum > Theory

Play What You Hear Guitar Course


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-01-2011, 01:26 PM
Vihar's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hungary
Posts: 400
Must Read

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattymel View Post
As long as there is a "release" it worked. 99% of all theory is useless if rhythm isnt strong, which is the downfall of 98% of all guitarists.
Two great points.
__________________
TINDERWET.COM
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-01-2011, 03:23 PM
mattymel's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 549
Default

i think that THE single most overlooked aspect of improvising is THE FORM. when alot of people start getting into transcribing they will do all their harmonic analysis as if Bird or Trane (or whoever) are always playing every chord on every 1st or 3rd beat of every measure, when in reality they are thinking more elastic. they know very well where the chord is, but they will sometimes anticipate or even delay chords 2 or 3 beats early/late. sometimes as much as 1 whole measure.

this combined with a strong rhythmic concept basically throws most theory out the window, at least in the way that most people are approaching it (looking at a transcription and trying to make sense of an E played on the down of 1 over a Eb minor, etc).

i totally agree that jazz (in its purest form) is much closer to a folk music. but in the same way that indian classical music is folk. there are disciplines that are required to be competent, much less GREAT. but the true masters have always left the "theory" behind. i always like to say that the term music "theory" is basically admitting right within the term that you can THEORETICALLY make sense out of music. but at the end of the day, it either works or it doesnt. and that can basically be decided by any listening person and hopefully one that likely has no notion that there even is such a thing as music theory.

and people wonder why nobody but other players buy jazz records anymore.
__________________
Waaaam...Doggy!

Gear:
1940 Epiphone DeLuxe w/ KA PU
2009 Gibson ES335 Historic 59' Reissue w/ Lollar LW HB
Nash T52 w/ Lollar 52's
2008 Gibson Les Paul 54' Historic Reissue w/ Lollar P90s
Headstrong Lil' King w/ Weber 10A125
1965 Fender Deluxe
Marshall 1974X w/ Scumback Scumnico/H55
Seattle guitar lessons
http://www.matthewmeldonguitar.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-01-2011, 10:50 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jzucker View Post
theory is simple. About as difficult as a multiplication table. Some folks need to make it complex with 12 pointed stars and geometric shapes and ... err ... terms like dodecaphonics (guilty as charged).

But really, nobody should be afraid of it. If you can read a novel you can read music and understand theory.
See, I saw the 12 point star as substitutions etc right away (augmented and diminished patterns) and how they relate to the fretboard in lines. I could take what I hear and move it around and learn to hear it in new ways and functions.

I gave it to a friend of mine and it just gave him a headache.

I also very strongly view theory as NOT analysis, but rather things you can do in a given situation. The more we learn how to manipulate sound the better our 'theory'. A visual artist who studies perspective will do some things better than a folk artist. Both may be really good artists. Grandma Moses was no Rembrandt but she was no slacker either.

Last edited by Billnc : 08-01-2011 at 10:58 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be