Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
11-28-2010, 08:18 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 677
| | Most influential jazz musicians - all time I pick three in chronological order:
Louis Armstrong
Charlie Parker
Miles Davis
What say you? | 
11-28-2010, 08:51 AM
| | | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: México
Posts: 87
| | John Coltrane.
__________________ Excuse my bad English! | 
11-28-2010, 09:15 AM
|  | | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Altered State
Posts: 727
| | Miles Davis
John Coltrane
Bill Evans
Wes Montgomery | 
11-28-2010, 09:54 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Manchester NW England
Posts: 446
| | Miles Davis
Charlie Parker
Wes Mongomery
John Coltrane | 
11-28-2010, 11:57 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
| | Oh sh.... Only four!!
I would say:
Louis Armstrong.
Charlie Parker
Miles Davis
John Coltrane | 
11-28-2010, 12:29 PM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 263
| | Art Tatum and Coleman Hawkins would have to be two...
If only because they were primary influences on Bird, who influenced...Everyone. | 
11-28-2010, 01:12 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 437
| | You'd think jazz was invented by Coleman Hawkins or Charlie Parker. What about this lot for 'influential'?:
W. C. Handy
Jelly Roll Morton
King Oliver
Duke Ellington
Count Basie
Benny Goodman | 
11-28-2010, 02:06 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,491
| | Sorry, can't just pick 3.
As simple as I can go would be:
Louis Armstrong
Duke Ellington
Lester Young
Charlie Parker
Miles Davis
John Coltrane
Kenny G.
OK, one of those was joke. Bet you can't tell which one.
Peace,
Kevin | 
11-28-2010, 02:39 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 437
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ksjazzguitar OK, one of those was joke. Bet you can't tell which one. |
It's Miles, isn't it? | 
11-28-2010, 02:54 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Manchester NW England
Posts: 446
| | influence Kevin it may be a joke but in the context of the OP.it may not be as daft as you think??? Good/Bad influence
Tom | 
11-28-2010, 08:32 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,491
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRoss It's Miles, isn't it? | Dang John, give others a chance to guess before you blurt out the answer!
Peace,
Kevin | 
11-28-2010, 11:12 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: CA
Posts: 275
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRoss ...W. C. Handy
Jelly Roll Morton
King Oliver
Duke Ellington
Count Basie
Benny Goodman | As valid as any I could come up with. | 
11-29-2010, 07:52 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: East of Eden
Posts: 1,783
| | Buddy Bolden? | 
11-29-2010, 07:55 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 437
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmic gumbo Buddy Bolden? | Ab-so-lute-ly. | 
11-29-2010, 09:51 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Most influencial? That is an easy one imo. Louie Armstrong is by far the most influencial jazz musician to ever live. I don't think it is debatable.
Mentions of Miles seems odd to me. Miles took jazz in more places than anyone else, but I don't hear people trying to sound like him really. He was more of a pioneer than influencer I think.
BTW, the mention of Kenny G is a riot! Thanks for the laugh this morning.  | 
11-29-2010, 10:06 AM
| | | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wpg man can
Posts: 744
| | 1charlie parker
2 coltrane
3 charlie parker
4 coltrane | 
11-29-2010, 10:20 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 437
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by derek Louie Armstrong is by far the most influencial jazz musician to ever live. I don't think it is debatable. | Most things are debatable, Derek. What are we calling 'influential?' You seem to be talking about influential on other jazz musicians, and we could also talk about influential on the public, by either of which definitions Louis Armstrong is a pretty good candidate for the top spot, I agree. I thought we were talking about influential on the course of jazz, though, according to which either cosmic gumbo's Buddy Bolden or my King Oliver has a better claim - without Buddy Bolden, it is quite possible jazz would never have existed at all, and without King Oliver, it wouldn't have existed as we know it (plus, Louis Armstrong learned all he knew from King Oliver). | 
11-29-2010, 12:37 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,331
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by franco6719 Oh sh.... Only four!!
I would say:
Louis Armstrong.
Charlie Parker
Miles Davis
John Coltrane |
+1 | 
11-29-2010, 12:48 PM
| | | | Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 165
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by derek Mentions of Miles seems odd to me. Miles took jazz in more places than anyone else, but I don't hear people trying to sound like him really. He was more of a pioneer than influencer I think. | True, but influence is measured by more than just "who sounds like who". I don't hear anyone trying to sound like Louis Armstrong or Lester Young, but I also don't think anyone would doubt their influence.
I would say that Miles has had the most influence in terms of "approach" to music than any other musician. | 
11-30-2010, 10:56 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRoss Most things are debatable, Derek. What are we calling 'influential?' You seem to be talking about influential on other jazz musicians, and we could also talk about influential on the public, by either of which definitions Louis Armstrong is a pretty good candidate for the top spot, I agree. I thought we were talking about influential on the course of jazz, though, according to which either cosmic gumbo's Buddy Bolden or my King Oliver has a better claim - without Buddy Bolden, it is quite possible jazz would never have existed at all, and without King Oliver, it wouldn't have existed as we know it (plus, Louis Armstrong learned all he knew from King Oliver). | Of course, most everything is debatable. I just don't find much of one here. That is, assuming we agree on (as you point out) what influential means. No doubt about Bolden and Oliver, but you could also say the same about Jelly roll and a number of others. | 
11-30-2010, 11:06 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by max_power True, but influence is measured by more than just "who sounds like who". I don't hear anyone trying to sound like Louis Armstrong or Lester Young, but I also don't think anyone would doubt their influence.
I would say that Miles has had the most influence in terms of "approach" to music than any other musician. | You don't hear anyone trying to sound like Pops now (though there certainly are some), but that wasn't true a generation ago. Just like everyone we idolize today on gutar totally copied Charlie Christain. There is no way to get away from his influence if you are a jazz guitarist. Herb, Wes, Grant, Barney, all confess to copying all of CC's solos. Guitarists are a pretty small fraction of the number of horn players who have come before us. That is to say, Pops influenced many more players than someone like CC.
I still see Miles as more of an inspiration than an influence, but maybe that is just semantics. Of course, in the bigger picture, all of these guys are links in the chain that gets us to where we are today. They all played their part, and as time goes by, we may see someone become more influential than Pops or Miles. I just know it won't be Kenny G.  | 
11-30-2010, 03:08 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,065
| | Louis Armstrong
Coleman Hawkins
Lester Young
Charlie Parker
John Coltrane
Why not Duke and Miles?
Duke was so unique and one of the greatest ever in American music, but few took him directly as a model - maybe because he was in a class of his own and his music was so personal. Mingus attempted to write music with the approach of the Duke, but Mingus' music was - well, Mingus and not Duke.
And Miles - IMHO he didn't invent so much himself, but was very good at picking up trends early and make the most out of them. But maybe I'm biased because I'm not so fund of Miles' music. I wonder where Miles would have been in the hieracy if Clifford Brown hadn't died so young in that car accident.
Last edited by oldane : 11-30-2010 at 03:11 PM.
| 
11-30-2010, 03:14 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,491
| | Does influence have to be obvious in the present to be real? There isn't any serious classical composer out there still trying to write like Bach, but his influence is still there, dissolved into the fabric of all music. Would there have been a Beethoven without Bach? A Chopin? A Wagner? A Louis Armstrong? In other words, if we built a time machine and went back and killed Bach as a child, how much future music would be different? We can only guess, but guess we can.
The same could be said in other fields, No one writes like Shakespeare anymore. Does that mean that he's not influential. No one makes movies like Charlie Chaplin anymore and almost all of Aristotle's science has been debunked. Does that mean that they were not influential? No, because without them, the next generation would have been entirely different, and the generation after that, etc.
I think that you have to look at their affect on their generation and the one that follows, and see how that fits into the path that got us to where we are then. The fact that no one plays like Satchmo anymore is irrelevant (IMHO) since without him there would have been no Bird (not as we know him today.) And with out Bird, no Miles. Without Miles, no Trane. Etc.
Just my thoughts on how we should define "influential."
Peace,
Kevin | 
11-30-2010, 03:24 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 677
| | Interesting that no one since Coltrane has been mentioned.
As far as I can note from the posts.
No one influential since 50 years ago? Interesting.
Oh, wait...Kenny G. | 
11-30-2010, 06:06 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 437
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Drumbler No one influential since 50 years ago? Interesting. | Well, we're to-ing and fro-ing a bit, that's the fun of a discussion like this. This is a heavily jazz-school-style-learning orientated forum and the first few posts were correspondingly bebop weighted, so I deliberately threw a few Dixie and Swing names in, just to remind people that jazz didn't begin with Charlie Parker. The reverse is true, as well, it didn't end in 1960, either:
The Modern Jazz Quartet (at least half of it)
Miles
Ornette Coleman
Keith "the cat's on the piano again" Jarrett
and on our own instrument
John McLaughlin and, of course,
Pat 'blast his eyes' Metheny | 
11-30-2010, 09:16 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,491
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Drumbler Interesting that no one since Coltrane has been mentioned. ... | I noticed that too. Maybe because jazz hasn't been such an "important" music form since then. Maybe because there have been fewer "superstars" and more just generally great players. Or maybe we need some historical perspective to gauge influence. IDK. Quote:
Originally Posted by Drumbler Oh, wait...Kenny G. | (Sigh) I knew I'd end up regretting it.
Peace,
Kevin
Last edited by ksjazzguitar : 11-30-2010 at 09:18 PM.
Reason: typo
| 
11-30-2010, 10:15 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Mississippi
Posts: 8
| | As far as jazz influences, here are mine; Santana, Miles Davis, and Al Di Miola.
__________________ Jazz is a woman; unpredictable, delectable, and a whole lot of wonderment. | 
11-30-2010, 10:47 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,331
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by dr. frums As far as jazz influences, here are mine; Santana, Miles Davis, and Al Di Miola. |
With all due respect, Carlos and Al are mis-categorized my friend. I believe that they would not argue. At least Carlos that is. | 
12-01-2010, 01:23 AM
| | | | Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 165
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Drumbler Interesting that no one since Coltrane has been mentioned.
As far as I can note from the posts.
No one influential since 50 years ago? Interesting. | I may be mistaken, but I can't think of anyone who has had a profound impact on the jazz scene as a whole since that era. There have certainly been influential musicians since then, but not to the same extent that guys like Coltrane, Miles, Bird etc had. | 
12-01-2010, 06:56 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 677
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by max_power I may be mistaken, but I can't think of anyone who has had a profound impact on the jazz scene as a whole since that era. There have certainly been influential musicians since then, but not to the same extent that guys like Coltrane, Miles, Bird etc had. | I agree.
There have certainly been tremendous musicians since that time. Many, many great artists. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |