Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
03-31-2010, 10:32 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Lincolnshire, England
Posts: 1,223
| | Different kinds of memory! Just musing really... I've been learning a lot of runs/licks lately (mainly from Ted Greene's books) and I find there are different ways in which you can remember them:
1. Visually - i.e. where the notes fall on the fingerboard, and in what sequence. Plus of course they make little shapes/patterns which etch themselves into your brain after a while. Greene himself mentions this as important.
2. Musically - i.e. you remember the sound of the lick in your head. In fact I would regard this as essential also as I think jazz improvisation is very much a hearing art.
3. What I will call "muscle memory" though I guess it is a subconcious kind of thing really. This causes your fingers to fly to the right places kind of automatically. Repetition seems to aid this type of memory. Even if I can't remember a particular lick sometimes, I often find I can play it if I just pick up the guitar and noodle. I'm not explaining this one well, but I'm sure people will know what I mean.
I guess they all matter in the end... My point though, is that sometimes one of these memory types can prevent me learning a lick in the other ways, sort of. For example, if I can already play a lick using muscle memory, I tend not to learn it as well in the visual way, or at least I have to work on things to get there. So just wondering if anyone can relate to what I'm talking about, or has any thoughts/advice with these things in mind? | 
03-31-2010, 10:56 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Meggy Just musing really... I've been learning a lot of runs/licks lately (mainly from Ted Greene's books) and I find there are different ways in which you can remember them:
1. Visually - i.e. where the notes fall on the fingerboard, and in what sequence. Plus of course they make little shapes/patterns which etch themselves into your brain after a while. Greene himself mentions this as important.
2. Musically - i.e. you remember the sound of the lick in your head. In fact I would regard this as essential also as I think jazz improvisation is very much a hearing art.
3. What I will call "muscle memory" though I guess it is a subconcious kind of thing really. This causes your fingers to fly to the right places kind of automatically. Repetition seems to aid this type of memory. Even if I can't remember a particular lick sometimes, I often find I can play it if I just pick up the guitar and noodle. I'm not explaining this one well, but I'm sure people will know what I mean.
I guess they all matter in the end... My point though, is that sometimes one of these memory types can prevent me learning a lick in the other ways, sort of. For example, if I can already play a lick using muscle memory, I tend not to learn it as well in the visual way, or at least I have to work on things to get there. So just wondering if anyone can relate to what I'm talking about, or has any thoughts/advice with these things in mind? |
Yes, all those certainly count, and are different. I would also include the mental gymnastics stuff like thinking about subs on the fly.
We all use visual, auditory and kinestetic learning styles, but tend to favor one. Research tells us that employing all 3 gives us the best chance of learning something.
I find it interesting when some say "just don't think, just play man." That is great for someone who is mostly a auditory learner, but probably for someone who is more visual, they may rely on fretboard patterns more. | 
03-31-2010, 11:01 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,987
| | Howard Roberts wrote about two types of memory in his book ten...
It was 1) muscle memory and 2) I'll call it conceptual memory (I can't remember his term).
The point he made was you can only work on conceptual memory for a short time before you're wasting your time - maybe 50 minutes max.
Muscle memory there is not time limit. As a matter of fact you don't even have to concentrate. For instance I remember he wrote you can work on muscle memory while watching TV. | 
03-31-2010, 11:11 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 907
| | Joe Pass says he used to watch tv while going over ideas. I heard that when I was young, and didn't believe him, but he was right. | 
03-31-2010, 11:31 AM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 781
| | Practice while watching TV, yep, guilty of that one. Always wonder whether one hour practicing a new bunch of patterns with full concentration is worth more than concentrating only enough to get it under the fingers, then mindlessly burning into muscle memory. Is it twice as effective? More? Moreover, is it worth it? Certainly can get tedious and boring without a distraction, but on the other hand, you can shift focus b/n left and right hands or pull focus on minutia that improve either your technique, or your musicality.
I'm lazy. I go mainly for muscle memory, but try to make up for it by being super alert when preparing new concepts to learn... | 
03-31-2010, 11:43 AM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NW UK
Posts: 377
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by fep Howard Roberts wrote about two types of memory in his book ten... | Dont suppose you have any more details on that book, do you?
Also, just to muddy the waters a little.....some would say there's a difference between rhythmic memory and pitch memory, and you can be stronger in one than another. Dunno if pitch memory could further be divided into harmonic memory and melodic memory, but I know I find it easier to remember chord progressions and rhythms than melodies accurately. | 
03-31-2010, 11:56 AM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,075
| | Meggy,
I would add a 4th (lacking a proper name) intellectual understanding and
awareness of the intervallic relations and rhythms.
Fep,
Is this related to Howard Roberts idea of conceptual memory? | 
03-31-2010, 12:03 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,987
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrybe Dont suppose you have any more details on that book, do you?
Also, just to muddy the waters a little.....some would say there's a difference between rhythmic memory and pitch memory, and you can be stronger in one than another. Dunno if pitch memory could further be divided into harmonic memory and melodic memory, but I know I find it easier to remember chord progressions and rhythms than melodies accurately. | Years ago, Musicain's Institute (GIT, PIT, VIT etc...) put out a book titled Ten. In the book are lessons from ten highly respected players (Eddie Van Halen, Les Wise, Joe Pass, Howard Roberts, Larry Carlton, Ron Eschete, Roben Ford, Tommy Tedesco, Jay Graydon, and Don Mock).
My guitar teacher showed it to me and I have been looking for it ever since. I haven't been able to find it.
Last edited by fep : 03-31-2010 at 12:14 PM.
| 
03-31-2010, 12:10 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,987
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by bako Meggy,
I would add a 4th (lacking a proper name) intellectual understanding and
awareness of the intervallic relations and rhythms.
Fep,
Is this related to Howard Roberts idea of conceptual memory? | I read that memory bit with my guitar teacher during a lesson so I don't have the book to refer too. But 'intellectual understanding' fits with my thoughts of what Howard was getting at for one type of memory.
I'm going to see if I can borrow that book. My teacher may not want to let it out of his hands though, it appears it may be unreplaceable. | 
03-31-2010, 12:19 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,987
| | I just found this on the internet (I think this may be from the book): On Learning Music, by Howard Roberts - MySpace-blog | van Kit Ruscoe
On Learning Music
By Howard Roberts
If you are like most people, you are either self-taught or you learned how to play a musical instrument in the public schools. If so, then be aware that you may have been programmed to learn in an inefficient and largely unrewarding way.
As a result, many hours of practice have been lost because you cannot remember what you learned. And, obviously, if you can't remember it, you can't use it. Unfortunately you may have invested a great deal of time and money only to feel as if learning music is all work and no reward. If this has been your experience, then it's time to learn a new way.
The problem of the old way is that it depends for its success upon rote learning and ineffective methods of memorization. By contrast, the new way is compatible with the way the nervous system processes information and enables you to make progress in a natural and satisfying way.
It is essential to bear in mind that the valuable years of learning, which passed when you were very young and the nervous system was still being formed, have already been given up to the old way. Habits have been formed which are, for the most part, bad habits. These are destructive to the learning process, and will not contribute to your growth of pleasure in the study of music. However, simply recognizing these habits for what they are is not enough to get rid of them. You may consciously understand the new way, but the unconscious is in the grip of the old way and will prevail unless you constantly remind your self. Presence of mind throughout the entire learning experience is necessary if you want to break the spell of the old habits. The new way may seem a little artificial to you because it is so unlike your previous training, but have faith - you will see results soon!
Now, let's look at the features of the new way. We will take up in turn: Quality, Quantity, Motivation, Diagnosis, Two Kinds of Memory, Recall, Time Frames, Accuracy and Speed, and Overload.
Quality
With the old way of learning, you are fed a piece of information of dubious relevance or importance and expected to master it for some future good, which you do not presently comprehend. Because the information is not perceived to be of use to you, it is not well enough imprinted for easy recall. Then, six months later, when you need it for a particular application, you have to go back and learn it all over again. This has taken twice the time for half the musical payoff. This does not mean that you won't encounter material from time to time whose immediate relevance is not clear to you. You will. Should you ignore it and go on to the next assignment? The answer is no. Once your eyes, ears and hands have touched a thing, there is a kind of déjà vu effect, which makes it much easier to remember later when the need arises. For this reason you should go through the regimen and discipline of learning that piece of information, knowing full well that you may not fully retain it this time around. There is however, a more efficient way to learn. It is based on the often heard but little appreciated rule that states: a person learns what he wants to learn when he wants to learn it. This is of the utmost importance in the selection of material. You must know exactly what you are working on and exactly why you want it. You must see how it fits into your present body of musical knowledge and how and where you will use it once you master it. Therefore, whenever possible, work only with information which has a useful purpose now.
Quantity
Let's talk for a moment about dealing with large quantities of information. When approaching a new piece of music with hundreds of notes that you are supposed to learn, are you going to learn all of those notes simultaneously? The answer is - not likely. Nevertheless, it is possible to make the simultaneous learning of many notes appear to happen, as it does with good studio sight-reading, but this is an illusion. They are still learning one note at a time; only the process is so accelerated, as to seem like magic.
The old Chinese proverb, "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step," changes the nature of the problem of learning altogether. You have only to play the first note successfully and properly to inform your nervous system that you are capable of playing that first note well and that you have now played your instrument correctly. You have now proven to yourself that you are a successful learner. Now you need only to build on the base - step by step, and the performance of the rest of the piece is merely a question of quantity rather than quality. In other words, if a student skier can ski the first three feet correctly, he certainly can ski the next three feet correctly and the next and the next. With this recognition comes strengthened motivation. The next note is easier to learn and the process accelerates. Just remember; after learning that first note, ask yourself simply - what is the next step? The obvious answer is - the next note. In this way, dealing with hundreds of notes at once never overwhelms you. The next step is just to put the first two notes together and perform them in sequence. You've now doubled the amount of material you1ve mastered without increasing the difficulty. Next? The third note and the fourth note and now all four together !
Motivation
We are all accustomed to think that motivation results from the input we receive from others, whether this is a gold star, a word of encouragement, or even a failing grade. This is part and parcel of the old way of learning, but the motivation received in this way is short-lived. The only lasting and reliable source of motivation is successful performance, and only you can insure this. The self is the real source of motivation.
When you turn to a lesson and sit down to devote fifty minutes of your time and concentration, you must be assured that at the end of the period you will put your instrument down and walk away with what you sat down to get. You just give up the habit of failing and replace it with the habit of success. You've got to walk away with the reward every time, or know exactly what went wrong. With the new way, failure to learn and grow is eliminated by design. You will never walk away with a blank because you are confused about what you are doing of because of poor study techniques. But how do you determine what to do if something does go wrong? This brings us to diagnosis.
Diagnosis
In your studies it is very important to be aware of the effects of environmental factors such as weather, light and background noise. If it is a hot, stifling day and the oxygen count is low, your learning is going to be affected. Improper lighting can cause fatigue and eye strain. Be sure that your practice area is well lit; if you are particularly sensitive to this problem you might solve it with full-spectrum lighting, etc. Next, be aware of distracting noises in the environment. We live in a world of 60 cycle hum. The electricity in all of our walls is humming away, producing a pitch somewhere between b-flat and b-natural. If there is an air conditioner of refrigerator nearby, the sound can influence everything you play. You can be severely out of tune with the refrigerator and easily misdiagnose the problem as a fault of a tin ear or lack of talent.
All of this points to a larger concern - the problem of properly diagnosing and identifying the obstacle to successful and rewarding learning. You might think, for instance, "No matter how hard I try, I cannot play fast enough - there must be something wrong with my hands." The problem may actually be only the poor synchronization of two excellent hands. | 
03-31-2010, 12:20 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,987
| | Howard Roberts article continued:
Finally, relaxation is an important factor. Being relaxed affects your blood-flow and your muscle tone. Proper posture is equally important. Get up from your chair, get the instrument out of your hands, and stretch frequently. If the task starts to seem overwhelming - lie down flat on the floor and breathe deeply for a few moments. Imagine yourself playing the passage perfectly; be kind and considerate to yourself- after all you are learning to play music for the joy of it. Keep yourself relaxed and comfortable at all times, and your learning will be many times more effective.
Two Kinds of Memory There are two kinds of memory involved in the learning process, motor memory and data memory. Your motor memory is the training of the physical or motor skills and your data memory is the memorizing of conceptual data. If you are training motor skills, you can practice for many long hours without doing any harm. The more of this kind of repetition the better. In fact, much of this kind of learning can be accomplished unconsciously. A person can achieve wonders while mindlessly staring at the television, playing or doodling for hours, even with the sound on.
With data memory (memorizing scales, fingering patterns, licks, songs, harmony etc.), you must work within very short time frames, making sure you do not exceed your attention span. Bear in mind that your attention span will vary from day to day, and may be as short as five, ten or fifteen minutes at any one sitting. The signal that you have come to the end of your natural attention span, may be anything from staring at the wall, to thinking about your vacation, to playing that little old blues lick you have known since you were seven. In this case, your unconscious mind is telling you, "you're done, you're full, and you've had enough for now." This is perfectly natural. So take a short break. It's no big deal. You'll recover quickly and you can continue on effectively.
Remember, then, that there are two completely different aspects to gaining musical control of the instrument. First, learn by mental rehearsal, visualization and recalling it from memory. Second (though no less important), develop and train your motor skills through repetition. Don't fall into the trap of confusing these two different types of learning by spending hours working without concentration trying to acquire conceptual data (data memory). Also, don't be fooled into thinking that there is a short cut to acquiring motor skills.
Recall
Studies have shown that the mind is like a camera. Once it gets a clear impression of the material, the picture is snapped into focus. You have it. It can now be recalled and replicated in order to train the motor system. Memory should not depend on repetition. Rather, the rote learning we are taught in school is actually destructive to the learning process. What you should be doing is looking at the material once to get a very clear, focused picture: then, mentally rehearsing it without actually using the instrument. On the old rote-memory system, you are taught to repeat the learning process over and over. This is where you start to forget. The picture blurs, and you do not learn how to remember.
Reinforce this new way of learning by staying away from the printed page as much as possible. Make the snapping of the image only once a matter of habit. Practice recalling the sounds and visualizing the fingerings that match those sounds. Do this when you1re stuck in traffic, waiting for the bus, standing in line at the bank or having lunch. In time this will become a second nature, and you will become a perpetual learner, able to learn as much away from the instrument as you can with it in your hands.
Time Frames
You may ask, "How long should I work on new material at any one time?" The answer is, you should work on new material in very short time frames. A few minutes of concentrated, thoughtful study can make a solid impression and can prove far more beneficial than hours of unfocused drudgery. You will need to assign yourself breaks by the clock until you become sensitive to your own physical and mental signals. So get yourself a kitchen timer and time each section of your practice. When your timer goes off, obey the discipline of the signal. Do not break it and go beyond your assigned time limit! Then as time goes by and you become better at managing your time, you will become more and more sensitive to your own limits, and you'll be able to sense when you have gone on too long and need to rest. Remember that, while on the old method it is all right to practice until you drop, the new method requires you to re-train yourself for a whole new kind of learning experience.
Accuracy and Speed
It is natural for any student of instrumental music to want to play fast right away. This is a perfectly legitimate desire. It is crucial to remember, however, that speed is a by-product of accuracy. If you're not accurate, your speed will simply not develop. If you try to play too fast too quickly you will simply reinforce the bad habit of sloppy playing. You're first mistake should serve as a signal, informing you not to do it again. That little mistake might not seem like much to the casual listener, but to you, engaged in the training of your motor system, that one mistake is far too costly to let slip by uncorrected. If you do let it go by, your nervous system will begin to view that level of performance as acceptable, and the mistake will become more and more difficult to overcome.
So and important rule to remember is: Do not make the same mistake more than once. Multiple mistakes of the same type are very dangerous. Once you make a mistake - stop, go back and slow it down to a tempo that you can play accurately without making a mistake. Then slowly increase the tempo and speed with accuracy will come naturally.
The Overload Problem
Now you might ask, "All right, now I've broken the material down into very small sections, and I'm going to work on them slowly. But how many of these small sections can I keep in the air at the same time?" This is where you have to answer your own question. The process of assembling small bits of material is like a juggling act. If you're trying to handle four small sections and at that moment you are only capable of handling three, adding the fourth can make you fumble the other three. So, if you feel a sense of overload, back off and concentrate on parts 1, 2, and 3. It is far better to leave your practice session with three bars of successfully accomplished study than to walk away with fifty bars of material you don't quite remember and can't quite execute. If you do subject yourself to overload, you will exhibit some discouraging symptoms. The most obvious symptom is not getting around to practicing - you just don't feel like doing it, even though you can't explain why. Does this sound familiar?
Remember, that the ability to manage your time must always be kept in consideration. Realize that it may never become completely natural to you, because our previous training is likely to be deeply ingrained. You'll have to remind yourself constantly that you are in the business of adopting new methods for more efficient learning.
Food For Thought
To become a well-rounded musician takes time and patience. Rarely does anyone accomplish such a goal in less than four years, and I would guess that the norm is five to ten years-or longer. It takes time to be a good musician. There are no shortcuts or quick fixes. Realize that very few people use their time to maximum efficiency. Minutes and hours of time pass unnoticed by most of us every day. Learn to use those minutes and hours, rather than wait for a longer, "more reasonable" time later. If there isn't time to do everything, then do something. It is better to concentrate on a smaller number of items, anyway, than to attempt everything in one session.
Here is an example: If you laid five bricks a day, at the end of the year you'd have a 10x10 practice room. If you copied one part from a score each day, by the end of a year, you'd have copied 24 arrangements for a 15-piece band. If you drive to school or work, have a stereo in your car, and the trip is 20 minutes each way, and you stay home on evenings and weekends, you can still listen to about 165 hours of music in a year. A typical jazz standard can be learned in about half an hour. If you learned a new jazz standard each day, in a year1s time you1ll have learned 365 songs.
By following these simple suggestions, at the end of the year you'd have a brick practice room, 24 arrangements copied, listened to 165 hours of music and learned 365 jazz standards.
This list probably doesn't coincide with your goals or the timetable you've set for accomplishing your goals. But it should be obvious to you that without forsaking many, if any of your present activities, you can accomplish your goals and become what you wish to be. | 
03-31-2010, 12:35 PM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: NW UK
Posts: 377
| | Thanks fep, that article is seriously awesome! Just got hold of another of his as well and, tho I've not had the chance to follow his course yet, the instructions in it were really useful to my present practice. I'm liking HR more and more. Not to mention being in love with the Gibson HR jazzbox since I was 16...lol
This is gonna be a key addition to my practice materials/guides. | 
03-31-2010, 02:14 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,324
| | Excellent. Thanks fep. | 
03-31-2010, 02:41 PM
| | | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 383
| | WOW...this is as heavy-duty learning advice as I've ever seen. It took me a couple of years of educational theory classes in college to get the same amount of information. To have it so concise will enable the end-goal of learning - how to use what you've learned.
Thank fep for posting this. It's great. | 
03-31-2010, 02:53 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Payson Arizona
Posts: 1,821
| | Howard Roberts Thanks fep, this is typical of HR's total approach to teaching music. Most of us are very aware of his masterful music playing abilities but few of us know of his genius with regard to teaching. He was absolutely the best!
wiz | 
03-31-2010, 03:10 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Greenacres, FL
Posts: 765
| | Thanks, Fep. That's great stuff. Wish it had only taken me half an hour to learn the changes to "All The Things You Are." Hell, I *still* fumble 'em if I let my concentration slip. (But I guess once I've engrained that, the next one's I learn should be much easier...) Again, thanks, Fep. That was a great article.
__________________ "I can not overemphasize how important it is to sing what you play or play what you are singing. You do not have to be a singer. You don't have to sing loudly, or even above your breath. Scatting, as this is sometimes called, directly improves your ability to play what you heard, which in turn sounds less like someone playing memorized patterns." Herb Ellis | 
04-01-2010, 09:11 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Lincolnshire, England
Posts: 1,223
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by derek Yes, all those certainly count, and are different. I would also include the mental gymnastics stuff like thinking about subs on the fly.
We all use visual, auditory and kinestetic learning styles, but tend to favor one. Research tells us that employing all 3 gives us the best chance of learning something.
I find it interesting when some say "just don't think, just play man." That is great for someone who is mostly a auditory learner, but probably for someone who is more visual, they may rely on fretboard patterns more. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fep Howard Roberts wrote about two types of memory in his book ten...
It was 1) muscle memory and 2) I'll call it conceptual memory (I can't remember his term).
The point he made was you can only work on conceptual memory for a short time before you're wasting your time - maybe 50 minutes max.
Muscle memory there is not time limit. As a matter of fact you don't even have to concentrate. For instance I remember he wrote you can work on muscle memory while watching TV. | Quote:
Originally Posted by bako Meggy,
I would add a 4th (lacking a proper name) intellectual understanding and
awareness of the intervallic relations and rhythms.
Fep,
Is this related to Howard Roberts idea of conceptual memory? | Thanks everyone for all the replies. "Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic" - cheers Derek for putting the proper words to my descriptions, and nice to know I'm not completely barking up the wrong tree also! Plus I do agree that there are probably at least several other memory types that could be identified such as your Mental Gynastics, and the intellectual one that Fep points out. I like that you mention that its OK to lean more on one particular type, and that this is natural for different types of learner - I always worry that I seem to be more an auditory/kinesthetic kind of guy, and not so hot on the visual lol. So if you were to ask me to write down the note locations/sequence for a run, without access to a guitar, I could do it, but it would take me a little thinking time. If you gave me a guitar, I could play it instantly. But maybe this is OK - I guess being able to play the notes, however achieved, is the main thing!
Nice one for putting Howard's chapter from "Ten" on there Fep - I'm lucky enough to have this book (some great stuff in there by the way), so have seen this before, and I have to agree that he was right on the money on this subject, as with a lot of stuff!
Cheers everyone!  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |