It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > The Jazz Guitar Forum > Improvisation

Play What You Hear Guitar Course


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2010, 12:39 PM
markerhodes's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Greenacres, FL
Posts: 761
Default How fast is fast enough?

I'm working on lines and choruses for the rhythm changes and wonder, "Hey, when is enough enough?" If I were in a band, I would know if I could handle things at the the needed tempo, but I'm a songwriter (-aka "loner asshole") who works alone. That's great for my playing in one sense--I have to play lines that make sense when there's no rhythm section behind me; it keeps me melodic--but in another, I may be spending too much time on things I have down well enough and not learning enough new materil.

Any thoughts?
__________________
"I can not overemphasize how important it is to sing what you play or play what you are singing. You do not have to be a singer. You don't have to sing loudly, or even above your breath. Scatting, as this is sometimes called, directly improves your ability to play what you heard, which in turn sounds less like someone playing memorized patterns."
Herb Ellis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2010, 01:01 PM
CC323
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I lean toward achieving complete mastery before moving on. Make vocabulary a part of you instead of BSing large quantities of it, and it will come out in your playing organically. That has worked for me so far. Good luck!

Chris
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2010, 01:07 PM
timscarey's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markerhodes View Post
I'm working on lines and choruses for the rhythm changes and wonder, "Hey, when is enough enough?" If I were in a band, I would know if I could handle things at the the needed tempo, but I'm a songwriter (-aka "loner asshole") who works alone. That's great for my playing in one sense--I have to play lines that make sense when there's no rhythm section behind me; it keeps me melodic--but in another, I may be spending too much time on things I have down well enough and not learning enough new materil.

Any thoughts?

it's never fast enough..... never.... just kidding. I beleive that is a metter of opinion and really depends on what your goals are. I never focus on speed with my students and only rarley in my own practice, unless, I know im going to be playing something at a specific tempo, in which case I practice it about 20 clicks faster than the target tempo. I find if you can play it at 180, you can play it at 160..... BPM that is.
__________________
Www.timcareymusic.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-20-2010, 06:28 PM
mr. beaumont's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chicago, IL
Posts: 5,288
Default

i like tim's idea.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2010, 07:07 PM
fep's Avatar
fep fep is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,420
Default

When I practice scales or licks - I'm maxing out at 1/16th notes at 120 bpm. Triplets at 150 bpm.

It's not great but it seems okay. I don't spend much time on it, I think if I really worked on it maybe I could increase by maybe 10%. I have other things that I think are more important to work on.

When tempos get too fast, I just connect to every other beat, or every 4th beat, sort of slowing it down without slowing it down.

In blues, pop, or rock you don't run into many uptemp tunes... Jazz though, what's up with the 220 bpm songs?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2010, 07:28 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Default I Blame Dexedrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by fep View Post
In blues, pop, or rock you don't run into many uptemp tunes... Jazz though, what's up with the 220 bpm songs?
Serious speed used to be available OTC, and many of the greats used it. On the other hand, I idolized McLaughlin, who did not use drugs, when I started playing, and I developed the ability to pick very fast. But nobody wanted to hear it (except metal shredders...and even they disliked most of the modes). Over the years I have consciously avoided playing fast, with excellent results. Most people just want to hear a nice melody, in my experience. But if you crave speed, start slow and work up to it with a metronome. Fast & sloppy has a very limited audience.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2010, 08:19 PM
timscarey's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBobWay View Post
Serious speed used to be available OTC, and many of the greats used it..

Ha Ha, that is halarious. Seriously though. It's waaaaayyyy easier to play fast on a saxophone or piano. guitar, bass, trombone, and even trumpet do pose quite a challenge though.
__________________
Www.timcareymusic.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2010, 10:58 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,804
Default

Violin.

The original shred instrument.


I alway dug Johnny Mc. But more for his unique compositions. Dance of Maya, Birds of Fire, Inner Mounting Flame.

I think he is definately one of the top 10 players in the world today.

But alas...speed isn't eveything. (with John Mc, you can hear the feeling in his music in his solos fast or not.)

Ther are still plenty of players that are not speed demons thay have plenty to "say"

Jim Hall, Pat Methaney, Bill Frissel, lots of others.


The real issue is what do YOU hear? Do you hear really fast melodies or what? If you don't hear shred then why try to emulat it? Take a tip from that Chris Stranding website and Play What You HEAR.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-20-2010, 11:28 PM
fep's Avatar
fep fep is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnW400 View Post
I alway dug Johnny Mc. But more for his unique compositions. Dance of Maya, Birds of Fire, Inner Mounting Flame.

I think he is definately one of the top 10 players in the world today.

But alas...speed isn't eveything. (with John Mc, you can hear the feeling in his music in his solos fast or not.)

.
From about 1:00 to 2:00, speed and feeling

YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2010, 03:18 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 747
Default

I wonder the same thing sometimes. Unfortunately, my nervy disposition makes me "hear" my dream improvs moving rather quickly, 8ths at 300 -320 bpm. Bird or Stitt like lines, even Oscar Peterson more so than say Pat Martino. Of course I can't play it yet, the best I'm doing is my own etudes at 280 -290. It is just so difficult to play quality lines mixing arps and lines etc at such a speed. The left hand is ok, but the right hand needs so much precision with it's control and synchronicity I'm wondering if I am just wasting my time spending hundreds of hours going from 240 to 280 bpm...

I do try to listen to slower phrasing and I do love it on other instruments, but I just like hearing the notes fly off the guitar, Wes, Farlow, Benson, Kessel, Django etc etc. These guys were certainly not mindless shredders playing modal nonsense randomly against anything at all. No sir, these guys made the changes! Didn't Farlow do a Cherokee at 400 bpm?!! Bastards....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2010, 11:34 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: detroit metro area
Posts: 68
Default playing real fast..zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

i notice you have a qoute from j pass. saw him in detroit a ways back. he played at masonic temple. when i was seated , and noticed his set up on the stage, it was a simple wooden chair, small amp, miked. end of story. when he began to play, it was amazing, an entire orchestra of sound came from his fingers, nothing was added that didn't need to be there. i heard him say ,as well as many other great players, its often what you don't play that makes all the difference. less is more. just my 2 cents worth bro.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-21-2010, 12:33 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddy j View Post
i notice you have a qoute from j pass. saw him in detroit a ways back. he played at masonic temple. when i was seated , and noticed his set up on the stage, it was a simple wooden chair, small amp, miked. end of story. when he began to play, it was amazing, an entire orchestra of sound came from his fingers, nothing was added that didn't need to be there. i heard him say ,as well as many other great players, its often what you don't play that makes all the difference. less is more. just my 2 cents worth bro.
I agree about JOe P, but he does indeed "shred". Check out his duo w/ Nils P
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2010, 01:43 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut, CA
Posts: 103
Default

Hi Everybody,

Some of you may find the link below interesting on who is fastest. You may want to check out some names you might not know.

Ron

My List of Fastest Alternate Picking speeds
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2010, 04:16 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlemos View Post
Hi Everybody,

Some of you may find the link below interesting on who is fastest. You may want to check out some names you might not know.

Ron

My List of Fastest Alternate Picking speeds
I like the qualifier 'quite inaccurate'. As it happens I can play 19 nps quite inaccurately.

thx for the list. no Marty Friedman?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-21-2010, 06:31 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Default Fascinating

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlemos View Post
Some of you may find the link below interesting on who is fastest.
That's very cool and I'm impressed that you took the time to clock them. Time & motion! But, what impresses me more, is that Paco plays at that speed with that clarity...with his fingers! OK, now I need to go listen to some JC Wilsey before I start goin' all Mahavishnu...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-21-2010, 06:40 PM
fep's Avatar
fep fep is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,420
Default

19 nps, picking every note... that just doesn't seem possible. That's 16th notes at 285 bpm!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-21-2010, 08:41 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut, CA
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBobWay View Post
That's very cool and I'm impressed that you took the time to clock them. Time & motion! But, what impresses me more, is that Paco plays at that speed with that clarity...with his fingers! OK, now I need to go listen to some JC Wilsey before I start goin' all Mahavishnu...
Hi JimBobWay (and everyone else),

Just want to clear up that I didn't do this work or have anything to do with it. I was just providing the link.

I apologize for any misunderstanding. In any event, with YouTube it is interesting to check some of these people out.

Ron
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-22-2010, 06:11 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fep View Post
19 nps, picking every note... that just doesn't seem possible. That's 16th notes at 285 bpm!!!
it was a joke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-22-2010, 11:19 AM
Reg Reg is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,154
Default

Most gigs don't require much technical proficiency, but you do need to be able to play tunes at burnin tempo. Most medium jazz tunes are played somewhere between 160 to 200 and the up tunes 200 to 300. I think you should be able to play 16th notes at least for the medium tempo tunes and after that, it just depends which group you want to be in. I personally enjoy playing and listening to players that can burn when they want to.
At gigs I can catch ears much quicker with a little flash early. I believe it's part of my responsibility to help teach the public about jazz, I wish it was theirs. Once I have there ears I try and do my part.
Most guitar player hit tempo walls because of bad technique, both hands. Any way I'm from the school that burnin is required technique, even if you don't use it. Reg

Last edited by Reg : 02-22-2010 at 03:54 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-22-2010, 11:24 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 747
Default

Ha, "Spasmodic Arm Vibration"... otherwise known as "Masturbation"
Honestly, I'm equally impressed by Typing competitions, ie, it's a sport, not an art. Playing nonsense at 480 bpm (unbroken 8ths) is for teenagers to jerk off over. But show me the guy who can improvise over any progression and make the changes in style at say 320 bpm, that's the guy I admire.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-22-2010, 12:53 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wexford, Ireland
Posts: 1,051
Default

The way I've always looked at it is-in any style of guitar playing- When you hum a guitar solo-an iconic solo-how many of those solo's were done at lightning speed? I think most people would know the guitar solos (to hum) of Hotel California, Something, Stairway to Heaven, Samba Pa Ti, Still got the Blues for you, Johnny B Goode and a 1000 others. I've yet to hear anyone-musician or not- hum one of these shredder solos.
What am I saying? A tiny bit of taste is better than a whole lot of notes-don't even bother practicing it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-22-2010, 01:23 PM
BigDaddyLoveHandles's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 4,103
Default

There's a drummer in my pod of veal-fattening-pens, er, cubicles, and he listens to heavy stuff on his headphones. He sometimes hums along and it's hilarious. It sounds like he's possessed. But even he doesn't hum the thrashing solos for very long.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-22-2010, 02:43 PM
timscarey's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 623
Default

Just thought of a funny metaphor for playing fast. It's like walking on hot coals.... very impressive, but only if you make it to the other side.

I sometimes play bass in the house band at a local jam session. last night 6 other bass player sat in over the course of the night. they all tried to play as fast as they could during their solos and the same thing happened to all of them...

A flurry of blues scale..... stop, now what? lets try it again..... a flurry of mixolydian... stop, now what?

it's the cats that go.... "alright, now I need to kick it up a notch and subdivide this shit hella small" (sorry bout the west coast lingo) that really have an impact on the audience.

Speed can be a real asset when it comes to getting hired and keeping a reputation in a scene, but only if you can resolve your lines in a melodic way that people can follow. At least in my experience.
__________________
Www.timcareymusic.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-22-2010, 05:52 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 223
Default

If you suck, and you get faster; all you'll do is suck faster. hahaha

But on a serious note, I'm not really too fast and I don't worry about it. I'm young in my guitar career and I know that speed will come as time goes on, especially since I work on technique about an hour a day, and have come a long way too.

Hey Reg, you wouldn't happen to have any footage or audio or yourself on the axe would ya? I would really like to hear you play.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-23-2010, 12:14 AM
Gilles's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 16
Send a message via Skype™ to Gilles
Jim Hall

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicjohnny View Post
If you suck, and you get faster; all you'll do is suck faster. hahaha.
I couldn't say it better!

Also : Think of Jim when you practice.
__________________
Practice Well,
Gilles
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-23-2010, 03:26 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 38
Default

I’ve been and still am quite ambivalent about the speed conundrum: like most of you guys, I know that speed is musically overrated, if not downright counter-productive, yet I still crave for it (and can’t achieve it).

Something that I would add to the debate is that there are different kinds of speed: on one hand there’s the raw speed, 16 nps scalar stuff a la Al Di Meola/John McLaughlin but, on the other hand, there’s a “slower speed” with very elaborate musical phrases; the typical example would be Metheny’s solo on “Have You Heard?” The latter impresses me much more than, say, the Guitar Trio (McLaughlin – DiMeola – De Lucia) stuff.

The super-fast shredding is pure mechanics, which doesn’t mean it’s easy to acquire; but once a musician acquires it, it becomes super-easy for him/her, it’s not anymore risk-taking, it can be played mindlessly and the problem is that it’s what they actually do. They tend to use and abuse of it and sacrifice musicality.

The process to acquire the “superfast” technique is not a big secret but as I said before it’s hard to actually achieve it. It’s a myth that it just comes with time, “like that”. You have to practice it, in the same way that if you want to compete in sprint running, you have to train specifically for that and not just do several miles of daily jogging each day.

Here’s the thing: arguably, most of us can play at 16Nps (or more) but only for fractions of seconds, beyond that duration we get all tense, accuracy goes down the drain and the phrase collapses, so the trick is to get rid of the tension… and then, good luck at that! Not only do you need to locate where the tension comes from but then you need to find the solution to prevent it from building up. For most of us it’s just Mission: Impossible.

What won’t work is to start slow and increase the metronome gradually. If you don’t find the way to get rid of the tension you’ll inevitably hit a speed-wall long before you reach the target.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-23-2010, 09:42 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Poconos,Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,506
Default

its up to you...

some audiences will want to say" man he really played fast."..

some will say" he plays so melodically"...and I can hum/sing the one tune I really liked...

IMO everyone learns to fill the measure with notes...but not everyone plays a melody that most want to hear...to bop or not to bop...that's the question..

time on the instrument..pierre
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-23-2010, 10:28 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlemos View Post
Hi Everybody,

Some of you may find the link below interesting on who is fastest. You may want to check out some names you might not know.

Ron

My List of Fastest Alternate Picking speeds
Out of interest, I'd like to know how quick guys like Martino, Benson, or even Oberg are burning. My guess is 12 nps or less (8ths at 360 bpm), but those guys at even 10 or 11 nps are playing much harder lines that are making the changes. Even if, at that speed, they are only semi improvised, to anyone struggling with improv, that is more admirable than fast rock style playing, which even I can do at 12 nps all night, all over the neck without too many gaps. Infact I swear I was doing that after I'd only been playing for 3 years. Fast forward another 20 and I'm still struggling to improv Jazz well at half that speed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-24-2010, 02:24 AM
Reg Reg is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicjohnny View Post
If you suck, and you get faster; all you'll do is suck faster. hahaha

But on a serious note, I'm not really too fast and I don't worry about it. I'm young in my guitar career and I know that speed will come as time goes on, especially since I work on technique about an hour a day, and have come a long way too.

Hey Reg, you wouldn't happen to have any footage or audio or yourself on the axe would ya? I would really like to hear you play.
Being able to burn doesn't mean your a good player, but not being able to burn doesn't mean your a good player either, technique is just a tool to help you get out what you hear. I dig getting on the edge sometimes, pushing myself and those around. Sometimes you crash and burn, but the majority of the time it helps bring the energy up. Obviously there's a balance... I'll try and download some samples of some recent live gigs. Reg
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-24-2010, 05:06 AM
franco6719's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by princeplanet View Post
Out of interest, I'd like to know how quick guys like Martino, Benson, or even Oberg are burning. My guess is 12 nps or less (8ths at 360 bpm), but those guys at even 10 or 11 nps are playing much harder lines that are making the changes. Even if, at that speed, they are only semi improvised, to anyone struggling with improv, that is more admirable than fast rock style playing, which even I can do at 12 nps all night, all over the neck without too many gaps. Infact I swear I was doing that after I'd only been playing for 3 years. Fast forward another 20 and I'm still struggling to improv Jazz well at half that speed.
My thoughts exactly.
__________________

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be