Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
03-28-2008, 12:40 PM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 742
| | Blues and rock guys rely heavily on string bends. It's very easy to get emotion and excitement into your playing with string bends and vibrato. In fact, and I base this comment on my experience and opinion alone: string bending is almost a form of cheating. When I started playing jazz, I stopped relying on string bends and man did that unmask me! | 
03-28-2008, 03:13 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: VA
Posts: 515
| | Yea I believe Kurt Cobain is #23 on Rolling Stone's list of the top 100 guitarists ever. Good song writer, and I like Nirvana, but for me that's reason enough to toss the whole list into the garbage can. | 
04-13-2008, 09:32 PM
| | | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 71
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by guitarplayer007 Are there any books i should get to really develope my speed for soloing and chord playing. I feel i'm lacking in the speed department. My speed is'nt awful but not what it should be for jazz.
thanks
Ken | It's like being the smallest guy on the football team. Your not the Biggest, strongest and fastest, but your the smartest. If you know what your doing musically and the notes you play and your phrasing is suberbly played, and you have a well developed ear, being the best musician in the room, but just not the fastest, than your going to be put on top, atleast on my list. Don't worry about speed of playing, spend your time on continuing studying music. Good Luck.
-perhaps | 
05-04-2008, 04:07 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: VA
Posts: 515
| | yea that's definitely a way to smooth out your playing. that's where the one octave scales come in so you don't have to switch areas of the neck when working on this. I'm wondering though if you meant 8 notes per measure not 8 notes per beat. haha. | 
05-04-2008, 09:34 PM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW Australia
Posts: 69
| | I started out playing jazz thinking if I had good jazz chops I'd be able to play anything.
Not so. I had a country gig a while back and after 20 years of playing and practising jazz I didn't really have a clue as to how to get an authentic, country sound.
I was bored and so, I imagine, was my audience. | 
05-05-2008, 04:22 PM
| | | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3
| | I know this has been said before but,
To Build Speed: use a metronome and scales, both melodic & chromatic all up and down the neck. Use alternate picking first, then master hybrid and sweep. Start slow and work your way up the tempo, but always make sure each note is sounding perfect at each speed and sometimes try setting the tempo a few steps above your comfort zone, then bring it back down and the same exercise will seem easier. Get John Petrucci's instructional DVD if you can.
On Rock & Jazz: Who cares? Music is music. One can't say a genre is harder, easier, better, worse because music is art and it's value is completely subjective to the beholder. For example, a simple two-chord Jazz tune is much easier to write, play or learn than something like one of Dream Theater's 45 minute prog-rock epics would be. The best bet is to learn about as many genres as you can and latch onto whatever makes you feel good and whatever you like to play the most. | 
05-05-2008, 04:28 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,576
| | one thing to consider when working on speed in a jazz context is working with Band in the Box or a play a long at fast speeds. Try treating a tune like a scale/arpeggio etc, start improvising really slow on say an F blues at 100 bpm, then after 5 or so choruses raise the speed by ten, and repeat until it in uncomfortable. Try doing this over the course of a week to see if your comfortableness at fast tempos gets better.
For me, in jazz there is a difference between playing fast scales and playing tunes fast. There is a whole other skill set that needs to be worked on in order to apply technique and knowledge in real time at fast tempos. The thought process, and ability to relax and focus, while improvising at up tempos can only be learned by doing it.
So I try to make sure I balance my technical practicing with "real life" application, by practicing improvisation at up tempos.
MW | 
05-06-2008, 09:47 AM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 742
| | For the love of God, man, that's 15 notes per second at 150bpm. Impressive! I can't even tremolo pick that fast.
Okay, I give up. No shredding for me. | 
07-06-2008, 12:33 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
| | i think to play fast (like django) you must anchor right hand on guitar body and dig in with your pick but angle the pick across the the string not hit it square on; players like django/ benson seem to be very possitive when they strike strings for fast runs hope that helps i need to think more on this topic! | 
07-08-2008, 06:02 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 738
| | anchoring your right hand Quote: |
anchoring generally leads to build-up of tension in your picking hand, resulting in tendonitis/RSI.
| Hi guys,
just a thought about anchoring.
If you anchor your right hand then the only joints used to move the pick are in the hand and these don't enjoy lateral movement too much. If the hand is not anchored to the guitar but is free to move, then the pick is moved by the elbow (which is perfectly aligned for this movement) and the wrist, which is able to twist with ease. Bit of a no-brainer deciding which to use if you don't want to injure yourself. | 
07-08-2008, 11:04 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
| | I agree with Finger picker about fingerpicking and I like the sentiment behind "walking in different shoes". We all love music - that's why we're here. There're things a good rock player can do that a good jazz player can't. Sure you need to know a LOT more as a jazz player, but what is this knowledge other than a substitute - extension for what creativity & inspiration flows out of us when we're soloing, mind clear, in the zone....
I'm brand new to this site & loving it. Interesting thread Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerpicker Chrizzia, I think you make a valid point. I would further challenge jazz players to play their favorite tunes in a rock format, or rockers to play in a classical format, or classical players to do some bluegrass, etc.
I get a big kick out of playing AC/DC tunes as a baroque classical guitar solos, or Tequila Sunrise with a bossa nova beat and altered chords.
I think if we would spend a little time walking in different shoes, we might go places we never expected to find. But that's just one person's opinion.  | | 
07-08-2008, 01:33 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
| | A better question might be how does one hear fast....and then play it?
It seems to me and from a few reliable jazz educators, that playing fast entails using patterns.
The key to making interesting melodies versus mindless shredding would be to be able to use and change patterns at very fast rate. To me the best improvisation is instant composition.
Many times, even Mclaughlin, when playing fast is not using interesting patterns...and it seem to me to be the same patterns over and over again. Listen to Michael Brecker do this and you'll see the difference. Mike is composing with the patterns.
I don't think there is a better format but once someone becomes more melodically and harmonically sophisticated in their hearing, the simpler stuff like some rock formats are not interesting.
The standards, in my opinion, don't lend themselves to a rock format. You can do anything for practice...but I love Green Dolphin Street as a swing or latin/ swing hybrid. When you funk it up...it starts to sound like smooth jazz...but each to his own.
When I want to play fusion stuff, I write my own tunes...but, also, am not interested in just using a A to G chord. | 
07-08-2008, 01:45 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
| | Come to think of it....Green Dolphin Street could work with a funk beat on the first 8 measures.
I would disagree with Sitarlo that everyone should play all styles. I don't think there are any rules. I dislike Dream Theater.I don't like that sound or the melodies or harmonies. I'm not saying that they are bad. I listened to them because of the raves about the guitar player.
I just don't like Dream Theater compared to listening to Wes Montgomery or John Coltrane. The feel is different. I do like some of Satriani's work but find him a bit boring melodically after a while.
People should play what they want . As you change...your ears and your life, the music you want to play and listen to, also, changes.
I would go back and listen to the history. Dream theater is based on what Louis Armstrong and Django showed what is possible...as well as all the blues men and women.
Last edited by Johnk : 07-08-2008 at 03:57 PM.
| 
07-09-2008, 03:14 PM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 574
| | I can't understand all this Rock vs. Jazz music. They are totally different. They use the scales differently, and I say scales in plural because lots of metal players use some scales and not only pentatonic. AC/DC, okay it's just rock and play only pentatonic, other metalers like Manowar during the solos in some songs they make noise with their guitars and that's their purpose, you can't dance with Yngwie's music but he uses lots of scales and he recorded a CD and made a tour with a classical orchestra, Steve Vai and Satriani use lots of scales,too.
I agree that in rock the harmonization is very simple because of the distortion but they can make a ballad sound pretty good with simple major and minor chords, sometimes 7ths, too. Metallica, Yngwie, Scorpions,
Extreme, Europe, Bon Jovi...
They are more popular? Yes, of course! I agree. But take it to the fact that people who don't understand anything about music prefer simple music like disco, R'n'R, remember the Twist's time, and nowadays...House! 
In the end, all styles use 12 notes. | 
07-10-2008, 12:02 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
| | Herbie Hancock doesn't consider his popular rock songs, like Rockit, to be jazz.
On the other hand, I just saw a documentary with Herbie playing on acoustic piano, with Tony Williams and Freddie Hubbard. The song was Canteloupe Island. Although there was a rock back beat, Freddie's solo was pure jazz.
Once, someone has played or listened to enough straight ahead jazz, the impression of what is jazz does change.
Again, for me, it is not that interesting to listen to metal oriented stuff. Modal jazz or fusion can be very good if the player knows how to solo.
Listen to Mike Brecker solo over the funk beat...on his less commercial ventures. He plays great.
I think that people prefer simpler music if they haven't been shown or put the effort into listening.
I brought my wife and a friend to a jazz club and they talked through the solos. They never learned about listening...so they heard it as backround . | 
07-10-2008, 01:29 PM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 574
| | Hi, JohnK!
Yes, I agree with you. I said all that because I know many people who don't know anything about music. Some of them aren't used to listen to music either thought some others do.
But what I mean to say is that commercial music is more popular than jazz, bebop, classical and even these rock/metal guitar heroes who tend to play more accurate music in their musical style.
By commercial music I mean simple music (go to a disco and you'll know what I mean), and good jazz is not simple music.
JohnK, my mother still doesn't understand why I "waste" my time playing music.  | 
07-14-2008, 08:44 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 17
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Gramps Rock/Jazz/Classical/Bluegrass..........
All are only as good as the person playing them. | Words of wisdom right there. | 
02-05-2009, 06:35 PM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
| | Hi, im using this site at the moment to get my speed up, it's helping me really iron out the bad habits in my technique: Speed Picking : How To Play Guitar Fast
Theres a free demo on there you can to try. | 
02-05-2009, 06:57 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,055
| | This is the mantra I try to follow:
1. We are 'shedders, not shredders.
2. Speed is a function of accuracy, and accuracy is best developed by playing a passage as SLOWLY as possible.
Books? Try "Sheets of Sound For Guitar", a massive book with hundreds of exercises by jack zucker. Home Page
I lent it to my guitar teacher, who wanted to take a look at it. I think it got lost under a pile of Bach transcriptions or something, never to be seen again. I've also subscribed to the following saying by my guitar teacher, "yeah, cats are playing a lot of notes, often at breakneck speed, but it's mostly a bunch of bullshit notes, like throwing shit against the wall".
in the end, quality trumps quantity. | 
02-05-2009, 08:37 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,424
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by xador Hi, im using this site at the moment to get my speed up, it's helping me really iron out the bad habits in my technique: Speed Picking : How To Play Guitar Fast
Theres a free demo on there you can to try. | I tried the demo and I like it. It uses a metronome that gradually increases in tempo as your progress thru that days excercise. Which is what I do already, the difference is with this program you don't have to stop playing and reach for the metronome every time you change tempos.
Cool idea. I'm tempted to do the yearly subscription. | 
02-05-2009, 08:58 PM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Poconos,Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,506
| | scales....straight 1/8ths....1/16ths....practice slowly till your mind and hands are on the same page...practice slowly to learn faster...the speed will come in time...play everyday....for technique building I have my students run through violin studies from violinonline.com..
time on the instrument ...pierre | 
02-05-2009, 11:02 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Shelbyville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,679
| | I remember what someone told me once about speed. Some players learn certain things by playing them at full speed and then work on correcting the sloppiness over a period of time. Other players start out slow and over a period of time build up the speed while concentrating on good technique so sloppiness doesn't creep into their playing. In my opinion, it's much easier to learn the second way because you only concentrate on what will get you where you want to go and you don't need to go back in and correct bad habits. It really works. | 
02-06-2009, 03:54 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 331
| | Music is music, if you are still at a stage where you talk about better or worse music, you should practice more. There is more to music than complexity and there is also more than only emotion. And most importantly, there is more than just you.
As far as "building speed" everyone has a different idea about it and how to utilize it. Jazz players certainly, speed comes secondary to articulation. If you play a line it's about all the notes in that line building something, if you can't articulate every note the way you want to, you are sacrificing a lot of your musicality, and for a jazz audience, that will not earn you any points. | 
02-06-2009, 10:55 AM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
| | Technically speaking, as many said above, practice regularly with a metronome at a speed you can manage. But there is one important thing I've learn to gain control and speed : watch closely for too much tension in your muscles : mainly in the shoulders, in the arms, in the hands and fingers. You would be surprise, if you stop at it, how many times or how often we get cramped with this undesirable tension. Often we don't even notice it. And you can forget about speed if you have any tension of this sort when you play ! Learn to detect this tension (it's not always evident) and when it happens, relax and start over, slower, concentrating on staying relaxed. | 
02-06-2009, 10:57 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: KC area
Posts: 4,323
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Dalton Music is music, if you are still at a stage where you talk about better or worse music, you should practice more. There is more to music than complexity and there is also more than only emotion. And most importantly, there is more than just you.
As far as "building speed" everyone has a different idea about it and how to utilize it. Jazz players certainly, speed comes secondary to articulation. If you play a line it's about all the notes in that line building something, if you can't articulate every note the way you want to, you are sacrificing a lot of your musicality, and for a jazz audience, that will not earn you any points. | Absolutely. Speed is just a tool for the toolbox, but playing jazz fast without focusing on content or phrasing is lame at best. You can get away with than it rock/metal, as the harmony is very elementary (bands like Dream Theatre not with standing), and you have thick distortion to cover a multitude of sins.
With jazz, you are playing a cleaner tone (usually), with more complex harmonies that rarely stay within one key. Better to do it right at first, work on timing and phrasing and allow speed to evolve over time. Remember, music is not an athletic event or competition, and thoughts about who is the fastest is the fodder for teenaged boys who read Guitar World.
Not saying that is your point at all xador, and I am not targeting the above at anyone in particular. It is just a topic that continues to crop up from time to time. | 
02-06-2009, 11:41 AM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: texas
Posts: 22
| | I prefer "quality" to "quantity" any day....... | 
02-06-2009, 01:36 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Shelbyville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,679
| | Joe, Guy, derek and bud. You guys have said it all beautifully. To paraphrase another famous musician, you can take one note and wring it out in such a way that you can make that girl in the first row cry her eyes out and raise her heart rate. | 
02-06-2009, 03:27 PM
| | | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 109
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by hot ford coupe Joe, Guy, derek and bud. You guys have said it all beautifully. To paraphrase another famous musician, you can take one note and wring it out in such a way that you can make that girl in the first row cry her eyes out and raise her heart rate. | O.K. now ! So that's what you're looking for  | 
02-06-2009, 04:29 PM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: texas
Posts: 22
| | | 
02-09-2009, 03:46 AM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 331
| | Haha, it's very true though, a single note can be a lot more powerfull than people think.
I remember meeting my teacher for the first time, he played one note the way notes are meant to be played and I knew I was with the right teacher.
Even after I moved, I made the trip to study under him once every 2 weeks. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |