It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > Gear > Guitar, Amps & Gizmos

Play What You Hear Guitar Course


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2010, 01:01 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Default Gibson Johnny SMith 25th Anniversary / Nat finish

Just put mine up for sale:

Bernunzio Uptown Music - Instrument sales Archtop Guitars, Gibson Johnny Smith

Great guitar....just a little big for me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2010, 03:07 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eureka, CA, USA
Posts: 1,789
Default

Oh. My. Word. What a beauty. For me, it would be conspicuous consumption, I think. Because I wanted the L-5 all my life and finally bought one ... I have too many years of longing invested in the L-5 to appreciate your lovely guitar, I'm afraid.

BUT lightning might strike at any time, so I'll keep looking at it. Thank you for sharing with us - if nothing else, we can appreciate that classic instrument as a work of art, however unobtainable.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2010, 03:42 PM
BigDaddyLoveHandles's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 4,107
Default

I'm no gentleman, but I do prefer blondes! Very nice. I know people are divided, but I like the look of the six finger tailpiece -- modern yet classic.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:10 PM
rpguitar's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 246
Default

A stunning, sensuous guitar, to be sure. Ironic, though, that the 'A' string tuner is clearly mounted cockeyed!

Still, lust-worthy it is.
__________________
Roger
---
1947 Super 400 | 1947 L-5N | 1934 L-5 Reissue | 1957 ES-175DN | 2011 Solomon Imperial
http://www.youtube.com/rpguitar
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:39 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eureka, CA, USA
Posts: 1,789
Default

That's a perceptive, interesting observation.

Since it doesn't affect form, fit or function (and is normally invisible) it definitely wouldn't deter me from buying the instrument. I'd consider the tuner mount to be an error by a craftsman - as opposed to the mass-produced CNC perfection to which we have become accustomed.

(Although I wouldn't be above using the slight imperfection as a negotiating point, LOL!)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:24 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randyc View Post
That's a perceptive, interesting observation.

Since it doesn't affect form, fit or function (and is normally invisible) it definitely wouldn't deter me from buying the instrument. I'd consider the tuner mount to be an error by a craftsman - as opposed to the mass-produced CNC perfection to which we have become accustomed.

(Although I wouldn't be above using the slight imperfection as a negotiating point, LOL!)
"Error by a craftsman"? It "doesn't affect form, fit, or function"? "Invisible"?
Well, I wouldn't want that "craftsman" to make anything for me! That's crappy work and there's no two ways about it. I wonder if the same "craftsman" did other, out-of-sight construction on the guitar?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:15 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,804
Default

I've noticed that on a lot of Gibsons that use the large tuning machine. I'll have to check my Super 400 and see if there off as well.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:43 AM
rpguitar's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 246
Default

Yes, this kind of thing is probably hiding nothing - probably just an "oh sh*t" moment for the guy who drilled the holes - but it takes away confidence in the care used to make the guitar. It really takes very little time to orient a tuner in its reamed hole, sight it out for symmetry with the others, and commit to the screw hole locations. So to mess that up one must be pretty careless.
__________________
Roger
---
1947 Super 400 | 1947 L-5N | 1934 L-5 Reissue | 1957 ES-175DN | 2011 Solomon Imperial
http://www.youtube.com/rpguitar
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:24 AM
FatJeff's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rainbow Village, USA
Posts: 2,086
Default

Wow - that's a beautiful guitar
__________________
♫♪ FatJeff ♫♪
http://www.youtube.com/user/jwright123456789
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-30-2010, 01:53 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eureka, CA, USA
Posts: 1,789
Default

In any event, that's a fairly routine fix. Done it many times, when changing tuners and the old screw hole is too close to where the new one needs to be. I'm still looking at this guitar - the main problem is psychoaddiction to my L-5. I'm sure that BDLH understands since he has a rather stunning example of L-5dom.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:00 PM
BigDaddyLoveHandles's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 4,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randyc View Post
I'm still looking at this guitar - the main problem is psychoaddiction to my L-5. I'm sure that BDLH understands since he has a rather stunning example of L-5dom.
I'm lurking! Randy, are you saying you're thinking of selling some guitar(s) to get the Johnny Smith? By the way, what's the scale length on this model? 25" even? I seem to recall it wasn't a full 25 1/2.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-30-2010, 02:22 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eureka, CA, USA
Posts: 1,789
Default

No, I learned forty years ago not to sell a guitar that I once had good reason to buy. These things are so much a part of my life that I couldn't even part with my old camping (classical) guitar.

I think that you're right about the scale length. That doesn't trouble me as much as I once thought. One of the reasons for initially purchasing an Epi Emp Rej was to see if I COULD play a long scale guitar, since I'm a small person. The 25 inch scale would probably suit me just fine.

I really can't see it in my future, though. I'm not kidding about my L-5 addiction, it's for real. Buying a JS would be like bringing a younger woman into the house with Mrs. randyc - just couldn't work out.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-31-2010, 12:31 PM
derek's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: KC area
Posts: 4,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randyc View Post
No, I learned forty years ago not to sell a guitar that I once had good reason to buy. These things are so much a part of my life that I couldn't even part with my old camping (classical) guitar.

I think that you're right about the scale length. That doesn't trouble me as much as I once thought. One of the reasons for initially purchasing an Epi Emp Rej was to see if I COULD play a long scale guitar, since I'm a small person. The 25 inch scale would probably suit me just fine.

I really can't see it in my future, though. I'm not kidding about my L-5 addiction, it's for real. Buying a JS would be like bringing a younger woman into the house with Mrs. randyc - just couldn't work out.
I got the opportunity to play one of these this summer. Just an outstanding guitar. The floater is not for me, but just an excellent example of Gibson getting it right. Good luck with the sale.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-31-2010, 04:18 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eureka, CA, USA
Posts: 1,789
Default

I did enjoy that Eagle a LOT ! With the semi-floating Bartolini, I thought that it was the best compromise for unamplified/amplified tone that I'd ever heard. I don't care for conventional floaters at all but loved the Bartolini - made a ton of sound clips and nobody could consistently pick out the Eagle from the L-5, both amplified. That would have been a fairly simple comparison with a conventional floater and conventional humbucker.

My Uncle is enjoying that guitar immensely. In fact just last week, he sent a CD of the Eagle played through three different amplifiers (two vacuum tube, one solid-state) asking my opinion about which sounded best. I couldn't make up my mind, even though he made the comparison simple by playing the same tune three times.

If not the last year the guitar bore that name, it certainly was close to the last year !
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be