It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > Gear > Guitar, Amps & Gizmos

Jazz Guitar Gazette Premium


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2012, 10:59 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 307
Default Wood cabinet for Princeton '65 Reissue Amp

Not that I don't have several wood working projects on the back burner, but I frequently look at my Princeton amp and envision a custom wood cabinet.

Recently, I stumbled upon this shot of a cabinet someone made for their amp and suddenly the Murphy Bed project began to back slide.

One of the things that occurs to me is to use the opportunity to go to a 12" speaker. And then it seems like adding a clone chassis to a new speaker and a cabinet that I build and I suddenly have two amps.

Decisions, decisions...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1533.jpg (98.3 KB, 59 views)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2012, 11:09 AM
oldane's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bborzell View Post
One of the things that occurs to me is to use the opportunity to go to a 12" speaker.
Some actually manage to sqeeze in a 12" speaker into a Princeton cabinet. It only works with certain speakers because it's a narrow fit.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2012, 11:53 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 600
Default

A priceton with a bigger 12" cab would be very nice

I tried out a Victoria Tweed Champ cct in a 12" pine cab which was a really great clean sound ..........not quite enough clean headroom tho

I sometimes think a really simple tweed champ type preamp cct
ie vol and a single tone knob combined with a bigger
say 20 watt fender type power amp in a 1 x 12" pine cab
would be ideal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2012, 01:07 PM
hallpass's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 412
Default

I love how that cabinet in that picture looks!

I have a 12" speaker in my PRRI. I bought a speaker baffle for the stock cabinet and it fit fine.

My speaker is an Eminence Lil Texas. The reasons I chose it:
1) High sensitivity (101db) meaning it's loud so I can get more out of the 15w of the PR. The speaker is high wattage so it won't breakup easily.
2) It's very light because it's a neo speaker

It works great for me in both jazz and rock settings. If I need more volume/headroom, I have a '71 Bandmaster 2x10 combo. But the PRRI covers most everything for me these days.

Last edited by hallpass : 01-29-2012 at 01:20 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:01 PM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 307
Default

I have mentioned my thoughts about a hardwood cabinet to a few friends and all three gave me a blank look, as in, "what's wrong with the cabinet it came with?" Oh, well.

So I am thinking about cherry and maple. Might even go so far as to glue up alternating strips.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2012, 04:14 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

I have had three different 12" speakers in my Princeton Reverb SF 1979. The baffle with 12" hole I had made by a pro tech.

The cheap Jensen was harsh and boomy, Eminence Red Fang sounds a bit asthmatic (maybe not broken in yet) but the real winner is Celestion Blue. Just amazing from the first seconds!

I also changed the pre-valve 12AX7 to a 12AU7. Now I get more cleans.

With my Gibson ES165 (BJB-minihumbucker -version) I get perfect classic jazzsounds with Treble 3, Bass 3 and Vol 3.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2012, 07:56 PM
hallpass's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbie View Post
I also changed the pre-valve 12AX7 to a 12AU7. Now I get more cleans.

With my Gibson ES165 (BJB-minihumbucker -version) I get perfect classic jazzsounds with Treble 3, Bass 3 and Vol 3.
I tried a 12au7 in a different amp a long time ago and found it lost too much volume. I've settled on using a 5751. It keeps good volume and still has a little less gain than a 12ax7.

I'll have to try those EQ settings on my PRRI. I've been doing more like bass and trable at 6 and keeping the tone knob on my guitar very low.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2012, 08:35 PM
cosmic gumbo's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East of Eden
Posts: 1,783
Default

If you do a nice job, maybe it'll weigh as much as a Fender twin...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2012, 01:23 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmic gumbo View Post
If you do a nice job, maybe it'll weigh as much as a Fender twin...
It is likely to put on few pounds, but it will continue to live like Jabba the Hut; sit in one spot and receive callers.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinopass View Post
I'll have to try those EQ settings on my PRRI. I've been doing more like bass and trable at 6 and keeping the tone knob on my guitar very low.
This could be a reason for its own thread – and maybe it is already discussed thru, but I have never understood this "jazz-sound-with-tone-to-zero" thing. My experience is that zeroing the tone kills the dynamics of the sound. This mumbling sound disappears in the mix.

And I have never heard a classic jazz guitarist sound thru this method. Wes has trebles, but he played with his thumbs. Grant Green said once: "You don't need bass or treble but the middles" and he turned the treble and bass to zero – or almost – from the amp. Jim Hall's latest records have some zero-tone sounds and maybe some Johnny Smith record.

This could be also a question of playing technique. Maybe some light player whose pick is like a butterfly over strings might get decent results with zero-tone. My deep and heavy plowing just feels like imprisoned that way.

The new enclosure is a beauty!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:11 PM
hallpass's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herbie View Post
This could be a reason for its own thread – and maybe it is already discussed thru, but I have never understood this "jazz-sound-with-tone-to-zero" thing. My experience is that zeroing the tone kills the dynamics of the sound. This mumbling sound disappears in the mix.

And I have never heard a classic jazz guitarist sound thru this method. Wes has trebles, but he played with his thumbs. Grant Green said once: "You don't need bass or treble but the middles" and he turned the treble and bass to zero – or almost – from the amp. Jim Hall's latest records have some zero-tone sounds and maybe some Johnny Smith record.

This could be also a question of playing technique. Maybe some light player whose pick is like a butterfly over strings might get decent results with zero-tone. My deep and heavy plowing just feels like imprisoned that way.

The new enclosure is a beauty!
Yea, this probably should be another thead topic and has been talked about here some already. You should chime in one of those or start another since you seem to feel strongly about it. But since we're here, I'll add my thoughts too.

Jim Hall and Joe Pass (non solo stuff generally) are tones I like personally, and typically dark. I like Wes too, who gets his tone from his thumb as you said.

I've found what works for me in the trio format I play in. But even that changes based on the acoustics of the room I'm playing in. The restaurant we play at sounds different then the room we rehearse, as do other places we play. So tone knob placement changes for me, rarely is it completely off at 0. I find I generally like my tone knob anywhere between 0 and 5 (10 being max).

Ultimately it's to each their own tone. No right or wrong if it moves you.

Last edited by hallpass : 01-30-2012 at 10:13 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-31-2012, 12:45 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 307
Default

I hope I haven't raised any expectations here. At the moment, I can't even walk through my shop without having to climb over a power washer, a scooter, several piles of wood turning cutoffs and a 2 wheel tractor.

Maybe the first step is getting the wood. I have some good maple that I can resaw. Next I need to choose between walnut and cherry for the contrast. And will it be maple on the darker wood or primarily maple with walnut or cherry for the accent?

Maybe choosing to clean a path through the shop is the first order of business.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be