Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
10-06-2010, 02:07 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Manila
Posts: 61
| | floating pick up questions hi to all, please do enlighten me. does floating or jazz pick up for arch top tend to sound more acoustic or not?
thanks .
Chai
__________________ Make Me Sick I Make Music | 
10-06-2010, 05:21 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Den Haag The Netherlands
Posts: 210
| | I think it does. When I compare my jazzer equipped with floaters to
for instance my Ibanez AF 105 (non floater) they sound more accoustic. | 
10-06-2010, 08:25 AM
|  | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 4,235
| | ... especially on (over?) a carved top. I think of my setup as a sort of electric acoustic hybrid. So, you can consider using either more of an acoustic amp, or a regular amp. | 
10-06-2010, 10:30 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Connecticut
Posts: 488
| | I think it does. I usually play my Artist Award acoustically, but Sunday I was at a monthly folk society meeting and played it through a Genz-Benz acoustic amp and it sounded more acoustically pure than many of the piezo pickups on flattops (no piezo quack).
Brad
__________________ Guitars:
1975 Guild Artist Award
1986 Guild X-170
1975 Guild Mark V
1930s Metro B archtop
2001 Gibson Chet Atkins CE
1995 Epi Howard Roberts Custom
1999 Godin ACS Nylon with synth
??? Giannini 7 string classical | 
10-06-2010, 01:08 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 22
| | For me it's hard to believe and even if it does, the reason cannot be the pickup, but has to be the effect of mounting something to the guitar body at the pickup position. Some years ago I made my thoughts about the physics of the coupled electro-acustic system of an archtop. If the pickup is not too bad and does not pickup the vibrations from the wood, I think there cannot be a remarkable difference other than from the disturbance of the body resonances due to the mounting of the pickup. | 
10-06-2010, 01:57 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: chicago, IL
Posts: 5,982
| | Yes and no.
First of all, there's different kinds of floating pickups on the market--do the research--some will be all about capturing a more realistic "acoustic" tone, some not.
The most commonly seen floaters are probably kent armstrong style mini-bucker, or a floating DeArmond, and they do have a brighter, snappier tone than many a routed in humbucker, but I wouldn't describe their tone as "acoustic."
Part of the reason for a floating pickup is to preserve the actual acoustic tone of the instrument by not cutting into the top. This may allow the guitar to sound better unplugged, but for the most part, plugged in, it's still an "electric" guitar sound. | 
10-06-2010, 02:33 PM
| | | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 82
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwingchai hi to all, please do enlighten me. does floating or jazz pick up for arch top tend to sound more acoustic or not?
thanks .
Chai | No, it doesn't. It helps maintain the acoustic properties of the guitar when played without electricity.
In the case of a Gibson Johnny Smith (for example), having a floating really matters not because the way he wanted the guitar braced makes for a not very pleasing acoustic tone. So, what was the point of the floating 'bucker? It's sharper than a full humbucker by design and has a bit of a "kick" to it but this has nothing to do with the fact that it is floating. Just the way it was designed.
So, find a good archtop that sounds good acoustically and add a floater to it. That's about the only way to get both sounds the way you want them... A pickup will make your guitar sound electric no matter what the style but the neat, full quality of a big archtop has a nice influence on the pickup tone. It's just not an acoustic tone that is amplified. Not at all.
IMO, of course.  | 
10-06-2010, 02:49 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 410
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Hoffman No, it doesn't. It helps maintain the acoustic properties of the guitar when played without electricity.
In the case of a Gibson Johnny Smith (for example), having a floating really matters not because the way he wanted the guitar braced makes for a not very pleasing acoustic tone. So, what was the point of the floating 'bucker? It's sharper than a full humbucker by design and has a bit of a "kick" to it but this has nothing to do with the fact that it is floating. Just the way it was designed.
So, find a good archtop that sounds good acoustically and add a floater to it. That's about the only way to get both sounds the way you want them... A pickup will make your guitar sound electric no matter what the style but the neat, full quality of a big archtop has a nice influence on the pickup tone. It's just not an acoustic tone that is amplified. Not at all.
IMO, of course.  | Sounds like good advice, Steve. By the way great new avatar BDLH! | 
10-06-2010, 03:02 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: The Golden State
Posts: 371
| | I see that folks have already staked out some positions, but I'll still venture mine...
I would say that whether the floating PU sounds more acoustic depends a lot on the PU. I have a carved top with a floating handmade KA single coil, and with the right amp EQ it can sound somewhat like the acoustic tone of the guitar. OTOH, my floating Bartolini HB sounds nothing at all like the acoustic tone of the guitar.
But I'll restate what all above say too: once you nail a PU to the top, well your great acoustic archtop isn't such a good of an acoustic archtop anymore, so no matter what you do at that point, it won't sound as "acoustic." | 
10-07-2010, 12:09 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Manila
Posts: 61
| | thanks for the replies,
question: which do jazzers prefer more, acoustic tone or the electric tone? And im referring about for the archtops when plugged.
and yea BDLH nice new avatar 
__________________ Make Me Sick I Make Music | 
10-07-2010, 08:55 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: chicago, IL
Posts: 5,982
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwingchai thanks for the replies,
question: which do jazzers prefer more, acoustic tone or the electric tone? And im referring about for the archtops when plugged. | I think it's all subjective to the playing situation and the player's preference.
I like recording solo guitar now with a more "acoustic" tone, I feel the overtones are more complex and it makes for a more interesting listen, considering you're only hearing one instrument.
In a group setting, I like a more electric tone, but one that's still pretty clean with no frills. I think Jimmy Raney had the best tone of all time, to give you an idea. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |