Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| 
11-24-2011, 06:16 AM
| | | | Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 24
| | Newbie question: What is the difference between 'chunk, chunk' rhythm and 'comping'? Hi,
I am going through a Jazz chords book. I am new to Jazz. What is the difference between 'chunk, chunk' rhythm and 'comping'?
Is the 'chunk, chunk' faster and more stacato and the 'comping' rhythm slower, gentler and fuller?
Thanks!!! | 
11-24-2011, 07:04 AM
| | | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 192
| | chunk chunk... is that the term the book uses? I would say that chunk chunk is more percussive, helps keep time, accenting the up beats, like a train, like in gypsy jazz. Comping would allow you to play the rhythm more i guess. | 
11-24-2011, 09:57 AM
|  | | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 201
| | "Chunk - Chunk"; To me, when I think "Chunk - Chunk", I think Freddie Green style rhythm. Freddie Green typically playing four to the bar rhythms.
Comping, IMO, would be a more syncopated form of playing chords over a tune. That, and you can be more ambiguous with your harmonic choices which would (hopefully) lead to more 'color'.
Here are two books that would most certainly help you: Amazon.com: Swing and Big Band Guitar: Four-To-The Bar Comping in the Style of Freddie Green (0073999951479): Charlton Johnson: Books Amazon.com: Barry Galbraith - Guitar Comping: Barry Galbraith: Books
While the last book really only notates what is being played and does not really get into the nuts and bolts of "comping" (although it does give you chord symbols), I think the difference between the two styles would be obvious once you learned at least one tune from that second book and then compared it to something you would learn in the first book.
Hope that helps | 
11-24-2011, 02:53 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,123
| | The difference also depends on the instrumental lineup. In a big band, you keep it simple and just count to 4. In a small combo, if you have a piano, then you may play very few notes. If you are comping during a bass solo, you might just play one quarter note per bar. | 
11-24-2011, 04:27 PM
| | | | Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 24
| | Ha ha, yes the book does call it 'chunk chunk'. I am going through Jazz Rhythm Guitar: A Systematic Approach to Chord Progressions by Roger Edison.
Thanks a lot y'all that all helps a lot!
Last edited by Morpeli : 11-24-2011 at 04:30 PM.
| 
11-24-2011, 04:32 PM
|  | | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Kelowna, BC Canada
Posts: 4,234
| | What would you call this? Boom-chick? | 
11-25-2011, 04:24 PM
|  | | | Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 83
| | I thought that "comping" was a more general term that simply referred to rhythmic accompaniment of solo instruments or vocals, regardless of rhythmic form. | 
11-25-2011, 06:14 PM
| | | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 403
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by EightString I thought that "comping" was a more general term that simply referred to rhythmic accompaniment of solo instruments or vocals, regardless of rhythmic form. | Me too. In the strict sense, it's an abbreviation of "accompanying". In my mind, the style mentioned by the op would be just one example of comping, but terminology sometimes takes on a life of its own. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |